Survey of U.S. Human Research Protection Organizations: Workload and Membership

Abstract

In a national survey of institutions with federally assured human research protection programs, we obtained workload and other relevant data on their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and management organizations. The number of IRBs increased substantially from 1995 to 2005/06 (491 to 2,728 IRBs) with a further increase in 2008 to 3,853 IRBs. Nationally, IRBs reviewed over a quarter million research applications in the year prior to our survey, of which 35% were new applications requiring full committee review. Compared to estimates from 1995, current IRBs review more new and full committee review applications, but the relative percentage of new and full committee applications remained about the same. High volume research institutions have IRBs with a substantially larger per person workload, relative to smaller volume IRBs (i.e., members spent nearly seven times more hours reviewing new applications outside formal committee meetings). Virtually all IRBs included community representatives as members (92%); however, a small number may not be compliant with federal regulations. The present findings suggest the need for research to (a) examine workload and its effects on review quality, research costs, and faculty morale, (b) develop methods for determining optimal fit between IRB workload demands and institutional labor and financing requirements, (c) construct benchmarks for judging reasonable workload for individual IRB members, and (d) examine if the need to recruit IRB scientific expertise from outside the institution, particularly true for smaller research institutions, causes delays in IRB review, and if a more effective way of locating and recruiting experts would improve quality and time to completion.

Keywords

IRB Survey workload structure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of University Professors. (2006). Research on human subjects: Academic freedom and the institutional review board. Retrieved November 1, 2006 from http://aaup.org/AAUP/comm/rep/A/humansubs.htm.

Bell

Whiton

, & Connelly

(1998). Evaluation of NIH implementation of section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, mandating a program of protection for research subjects. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Bledsoe

C. H.

Sherin

Galinsky

A. G.

Headley

N. M.

Heimer

C. A.

Kjeldgaard

(2007). Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review, 101(2), 593–641.

Campbell

Weissman

Clarridge

Yucel

Causino

, & Blumenthal

(2003). Characteristics of medical school faculty members serving on institutional review boards: Results of a national survey. Academy of Medicine, 78, 831–836.

Citro

C. F.

Ilgen

D. R.

, & Marrett

C. B.

(2003). Protecting participants and facilitating social and behavioral sciences research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

De Vries

& Forsberg

(2002). What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive? Accountability in Research, 9, 199–206.

Gray

Cooke

, & Tannenbaum

(1978). Research involving human subjects. Science, 201, 1094–1101.

Gunsalus

Bruner

Burbules

Dash

Finkin

Goldberg

(2007). The Illinois White Paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB “mission creep.” Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 617–649.

Hamburger

(2005). The new censorship: Institutional review boards (University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 95). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

10.

Institute of Medicine. (2003). Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

11.

Rubin

& Sieber

J. E.

(2006). Empirical research on IRBs and methodologies usually associated with minimal risk. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(4), 1–4.

12.

Sengupta

& Lo

(2003). The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of institutional review boards, Academic Medicine, 78(2), 212–218.

13.

Wagner

& Barnett

(2000). Human research compliance programs: Optimal operating costs in VA (VA Health Economics Resource Center Technical Report #2). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.