Researcher Perspectives on Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Genetic Research

Abstract

Genetic research can produce information that is beyond the aims of the research study yet may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 researchers who were asked to describe how they would respond to a hypothetical vignette regarding the disclosure of findings with unanticipated clinical significance to research study participants. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content and thematic analyses. Researchers' decision-making processes about whether to disclose incidental findings were governed by potentially conflicting duties in three primary domains: Information quality, adherence to rules, and participant welfare. There are several actions researchers can take to prepare for incidental findings, including: Adding specific language in informed consent documents to state clearly how investigators will handle disclosure; exploring how prepared participants might be during the consent process to make decisions about how they would like to be approached in the event of incidental findings; developing procedures for appropriately communicating individual results and providing follow-up support based on participant preferences; and, in genetic research, having an awareness of the range of traits expressed by the genes under study.

Keywords

incidental findings genetic studies decision-making processes communication of results disclosure qualitative research vignette study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attride-Stirling

(2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.

Beskow

L. M.

(2006). Considering the nature of individual research results. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 38–40.

Beskow

L. M.

Burke

Merz

J. F.

Barr

P. A.

Terry

Penchaszadeh

V. B.

Gostin

L. O.

Gwinn

, & Khoury

M. J.

(2001). Informed consent for ***population-based research involving genetics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(18), 2315–2321.

Cho

M. K.

(2008). Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 208–212.

Clayton

E. W.

& Ross

L. F.

(2006). Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 37.

Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects Research. Retrieved July 14, 2009 from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html.

Facio

F. M.

(2006). One size does not fit all. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 40–42.

Fernandez

C. V.

Kodish

& Weijer

(2003). Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative. IRB, 25(3), 12–19.

Fernandez

C. V.

Skedgel

, & Weijer

(2004). Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(9), 1417–1419.

10.

Fernandez

C. V.

& Weijer

(2006). Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 44–46.

11.

Fryer-Edwards

& Fullerton

S. M.

(2006). Relationships with test-tubes: Where's the reciprocity? American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 36–38.

12.

Hsieh

H. F.

& Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

13.

Illes

Kirschen

M. P.

Edwards

Bandettini

Cho

M. K.

Ford

P. J.

Glover

G. H.

Kulynych

Macklin

Michael

D. B.

Wolf

S. M.

Grabowski

, & Seto

(2008). Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. Neurology, 70(5), 384–390.

14.

Keane

M. A.

(2008). Institutional review board approaches to the incidental findings problem. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 352–355.

15.

Knoppers

B. M.

Joly

Simard

, & Durocher

(2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14(11), 1170–1178.

16.

Lavieri

R. R.

& Garner

S. A.

(2006). Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 46–48.

17.

Miller

F. A.

Christiansen

Giacomini

, & Robert

J. S.

(2008). Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(3), 210–213.

18.

Miller

F. G.

Mello

M. M.

, & Joffe

(2008). Incidental findings in human subjects research: What do investigators owe research participants? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 271–279.

19.

Murphy

Scott

Kaufman

Geller

LeRoy

, & Hudson

(2008). Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(11), 36–43.

20.

National Bioethics Advisory Committee (NBAC). (1999). Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance. Rockville, MD: NBAC.

21.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2004). NHLBI Working Group on Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies, Bethesda, MD, July 12. Retrieved July 14, 2009 from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/gene-results.htm.

22.

National Human Genome Research Institute. (2003). Federal Policy Recommendations Including HIPAA. Retrieved July 13, 2009 from http://www.genome.gov/11510216.

23.

Parker

L. S.

(2008). The future of incidental findings: Should they be viewed as benefits? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 341–351.

24.

Ravitsky

& Wilfond

B. S.

(2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 8–17. See also the associated commentaries, pp. 18–46.

25.

Richardson

H. S.

& Belsky

(2004). The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers: An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. The Hastings Center Report, 34(1), 25–33.

26.

Shalowitz

D. I.

& Miller

F. G.

(2005). Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(6), 737–740.

27.

Sharp

R. R.

& Foster

M. W.

(2006). Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 42–44.

28.

Wolf

S. M.

Lawrenz

F. P.

Nelson

C. A.

Kahn

J. P.

Cho

M. K.

Clayton

E. W.

Fletcher

J. G.

Georgieff

M. K.

(2008). Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 219–248.