Ethical tensions exist regarding the value and practice of acknowledging Indigenous contributions in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Semistructured phone interviews with researchers documented their perspectives on authorship in the scholarly dissemination of their community-based participatory Indigenous research. Thematic analysis resulted in four key ideas: (1) current practices regarding methods of acknowledging community contributions; (2) requirements for shared authorship with individual versus collective/community partners; (3) benefits to sharing authorship with collective/community partners; and (4) risks to sharing authorship with collective/community partners. Findings suggest an emerging but inconsistent practice.
AdelsonN. (2005). The embodiment of inequality: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(Suppl. 2), S45–S61.
2.
AlfredT. (1999). Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
3.
AronsonJ. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1).
4.
Assembly of First Nations. (2007). OCAP Ownership, Control, Access and Possession: First Nations Inherent Right to Govern First Nations Data. Ottawa, Ontario: Assembly of First Nations.
5.
BallJ. & JanystP. (2008). Enacting research ethics in partnerships with indigenous communities in Canada: “Do it in a good way.”Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 33–51.
6.
BattisteM. & YoungbloodJ. (2000). Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Purich.
7.
BaxterJ. & EylesJ. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing “rigour” in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505–525.
8.
BordeauxB.WileyC.TandonDarius S.HorowitzC.BrownBohrer P., & BassE. (2007). Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 1(3), 281–288.
9.
CastellanoBrant M. (2004). Ethics of Aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 98–114.
10.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2007). CIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal People. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
11.
CastledenH.CrooksV.SchuurmanN., & HanlonN. (2010). “It's not necessarily the distance on the map …”: Using place as an analytic tool to elucidate geographic issues central to rural palliative care. Health & Place, 16(2), 284–290.
12.
CastledenH., Garvin, T., & Huu-ay-aht First Nation. (2008). Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1393–1405.
EliasB.O'NeilJ., & SandersonD. (2004). The politics of trust and participation: A case study in developing first nations and university capacity to build health information systems in First Nations context. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 68–78.
15.
ErmineW.SinclairW., & JefferyB. (2004). The Ethics of Research Involving Indigenous Peoples. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Indigenous Peoples' Health Research Centre.
16.
FletcherC. (2003). Community-based participatory research relationships with aboriginal communities in Canada: An overview of the context and process. Pimatziwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 1(1), 27–62.
17.
FlickerS.SavanB.KolendaB., & MildenbergerM. (2007). A snapshot of community-based research in Canada: Who? What? Why? How?Health Education Research, 23(1), 106–114.
18.
GilesA. R. & CastledenH. (2008). Community co-authorship in academic publishing: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(1), 208–216.
19.
GlassK. & KaufertJ. (2007). Research ethics review and Aboriginal community values: Can the two be reconciled?Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(2), 25–40.
20.
Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. (2009). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, Draft 2nd edition. Ottawa, Ontario: Interagency Secretariat on Research Ethics.
21.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2006). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved September 17, 2009 from http://www.icmje.org/icmje.pdf.
22.
KhanlouN. & PeterE. (2005). Participatory action research: Considerations for ethical review. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2333–2340.
23.
KuhnT. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
MaarM.McGregorSutherland M., & McGregorL. (2005). First Nations taking charge of health research: The development of community-based ethics review process on Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: The National Council on Ethics in Human Research (NCEHR).
25.
MacauleyA.CrossE.DelormierT.PotvinL.ParadisG., & McComberA. (1998). Developing a Code of Research Ethics for research with a Native community in Canada: A report from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 57(Suppl. 1), 38–40.
26.
McGregorD. (2004). Coming full circle: Indigenous knowledge, environment, and our future. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3&4), 385–410.
27.
MinklerM. & WallersteinN. (2003). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
28.
NadasdyP. (2003). Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge and Aboriginal–State Relations in the Southwest Yukon. Vancouver, British Columbia: University of British Columbia Press.
29.
National Aboriginal Health Organization. (2005). Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP) or Self-Determination Applied to Research: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary First Nations Research and Some Options for First Nations Communities. Ottawa, Ontario: First Nations Centre.
30.
Office of Community-Based Research. (2009). The Funding and Development of Community-University Research Partnerships in Canada: Evidence-based Investment in Knowledge, Engaged Scholarship, Innovation, and Action for Canada's Future. Victoria, British Columbia: University of Victoria Office of Community-based Research.
31.
PattersonM.JacksonR., & EdwardsN. (2006). Ethics in aboriginal research: Comments on paradigms, process and two worlds. Canadian Journal of Aboriginal Community-based HIV/AIDS Research, 1(1), 47–57.
32.
ReadingJ. & NowgesicE. (2002). Improving the health of future generations: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Aboriginal Peoples' Health. American Journal of Public Health, 92(9), 1396–1400.
33.
ReidC. & BriefE. (2009). Confronting condescending ethics: How community-based research challenges traditional approaches to consent, confidentiality, and capacity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(1&2), 75–85.
34.
SchnarchB. (2004). Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.
35.
SilkaL.CleghornG.GrullonM., Tellez, T., & Lawrence Research Initiative Working Group. (2008). Creating community-based participatory research in a diverse community: A case study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 5–16.
36.
SimpsonL. (2004). Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of Indigenous knowledge. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3&4), 373–384.
37.
SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People. London, England: Zed Books.
38.
WallworkE. (2008). Ethical analysis of research partnerships with communities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18(1), 57–85.
39.
WhittemoreR.ChaseS., & MandleC. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537.
