A Multicenter Study of the Awareness and Attitudes of Egyptian Faculty towards Research Ethics: A Pilot Study

Abstract

The awareness and attitudes of faculty towards research ethics committees (RECs) and research ethics practices are largely unknown. Accordingly, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving various faculties (Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Dentistry) from four universities in Egypt. A large majority (> 85%) held positive attitudes towards RECs, but almost a third thought that RECs would delay research. More than half had not received prior training in research or medical ethics, but more than 90% thought that this subject matter should be taught to postgraduates. A large majority recognized the need for informed consent and confidentiality protections in research, but some held attitudes regarding certain research ethics practices that were questionable. We conclude that a curriculum in research ethics should be developed for university faculty and that further qualitative studies should explore the basis of several of the attitudes regarding practices in research ethics.

Keywords

research ethics research ethics committees human subject protections research integrity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rab

Abdur M.

Abou-Zeid

Afzal

, & Silverman

H. J.

(2008). Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization: A retrospective data analysis. PLoS ONE, 3, e2094.

Rab

Abdur M.

& Mamdouh

(2004). Ethics in health in EMRO: Practices and perceptions among health researchers in the region. Global Forum for Health Research. Retrieved November 2007 from http://medschool.umaryland.edu/geei/docs/AbdurRab_GlobalForum.pdf.

Abou-Zeid

Afzal

, & Silverman

H. J.

(2006). Informed consent as an ethical requirement for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization. Proceedings of the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R '06). PRIM&R Conference, Washington, DC.

Ajuwon

A. J.

& Kass

N. E.

(2008). Outcome of a research ethics training workshop among clinicians and scientists in a Nigerian university. BMC Medical Ethics, 9(1). Available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/9/1.

Al-Shahi

Salman R.

Brock

T. M.

Dennis

M. S.

Sandercock

P. A. G.

White

P. M.

, & Warlow

(2007). Research governance impediments to clinical trials: A retrospective survey. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(2), 101–104.

Allen

& Waters

W. E.

(1983). Attitudes to research ethical committees. Journal of Medical Ethics, 9(2), 61–65.

Anderson

M. S.

Horn

A. S.

Risbey

K. R.

Ronning

E. A.

De Vries

, & Martinson

B. C.

(2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.

Asem

& Silverman

H. J.

(2009). Perspectives of faculty at Cairo University towards research ethics and informed consent. Proceedings of the Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R '06). PRIM&R 2009 Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Bhutta

A. Z.

(2002). Ethics in international health research: A perspective from the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 114–120.

10.

Brown

& Kalichman

(1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4, 487–498.

11.

Burris

& Moss

(2006). U.S. health researchers review their ethics review boards: A qualitative study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(2), 39–58.

12.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: CIOMS.

13.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

14.

Dodani

& Laporte

R. E.

(2008). Ways to strengthen research capacity in developing countries: Effectiveness of a research training workshop in Pakistan. Public Health, 122(6), 578–587.

15.

Druml

Wolzt

Peleiner

, & Singer

E. A.

(2009). Research ethics committees in Europe: Trials and tribulations. Intensive Care Medicine, 35, 1636–1640.

16.

Eastwood

Derish

Leash

, & Ordway

(1996). Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellow responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(1), 89–114.

17.

Elsayed

D. E. M.

& Kass

N. E.

(2007). Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan. Developing World Bioethics, 7(3), 143–148.

18.

Fanelli

(2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738.

19.

Fogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health. (2005). Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative (MERETI). Retrieved July 2010 from http://medschool.umaryland.edu/mereti/.

20.

Fost

& Levine

R. J.

(2007). The dysregulation of human subjects research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(18), 2196–2198.

21.

Gilbert

(2008). Trials and tribulations. Hastings Center Report, 38(2), 14–18.

22.

Heitman

& Litewka

(2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology, 29(1), 104–108.

23.

Heitman

Olsen

C. H.

Anestidou

, & Bulger

R. E.

(2007). New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 838–845.

24.

Kalichman

M. W.

& Freidman

P. J.

(1992). A pilot study of bomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine, 67(11), 769–775.

25.

Krishnakumar

(2001). Ethics on trial. Frontline: India's National Magazine, 18(16), August 4–17. Retrieved from http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1816/18161230.htm.

26.

London

& McCarty

(1998). Teaching medical students on the ethical dimensions of human rights: Meeting the challenge in South Africa. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(4), 257–262.

27.

Malek

J. L.

Geller

, & Sugarman

(2000). Talking about cases in bioethics: The effect of an intensive course on health care professionals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(2), 131–136.

28.

Mallick

A. A.

& O'Callaghan

F. J. K.

(2009). Research governance delays for a multicentre non-interventional study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(5), 195–198.

29.

Mansbach

Acholonu

Clark

, & Camargo

(2007). Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(4), 377–380.

30.

Martinson

B. C.

Crain

A. L.

De Vries

, & Anderson

M. S.

(2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67–83.

31.

McMillan

J. H.

(1997). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Longman Publishing Group.

32.

McWilliams

Hoover-Fong

Hamosh

Beck

Beaty

, & Cutting

(2003). Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(3), 360–366.

33.

Mundt

L. A.

(2008). Perceptions of scientific misconduct among graduate allied health students relative to ethics education and gender. Journal of Allied Health, 37(4), 221–224.

34.

National Institutes of Health. (2010). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved November 2007 from www.clinicaltrials.gov.

35.

Normile

(2008). The promise and pitfalls of clinical trials overseas. Science, 322, 214–216.

36.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2002). The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

37.

Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP): Department of Health & Human Services. (2010). Retrieved March 2010 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances.

38.

Plemmons

D. K.

Brody

S. A.

, & Kalichman

M. W.

(2006). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 571–820.

39.

Pollock

R. E.

Curley

S. A.

, & Lotzova

(1995). Ethics of research training for NIH T32 surgical investigators. Journal of Surgical Research, 58(2), 247–251.

40.

Silverman

H. J.

Hull

S. C.

, & Sugarman

(2001). Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine, 29(2), 235–241.

41.

Stair

T. O.

Reed

C. R.

Radeos

M. S.

Koski

, & Camargo

C. A.

(2001). Variation in institutional review boards responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trials. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(6), 636–641.

42.

Warlow

(2005). Over-regulation of clinical research: A threat to public health. Clinical Medicine, 5(1), 33–38.

43.

Willyard

(2007). Pfizer lawsuit spotlights ethics of developing world clinical trials. Nature Medicine, 13(7), 763.

44.

World Medical Association (WMA). (2008). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 59^th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, South Korea. Retrieved February 2011 from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.