We examine motivations for, and costs/benefits of, participation in three interviews across a one-year period among women recently exposed to intimate partner abuse (IPA). Recruited from publicly accessible police reports, women were not informed that the study focused on IPA in recruiting materials or when they scheduled the first interview. Women's ratings on the Response to Research Participation Questionnaire (RRPQ) indicated a positive benefit-to-cost ratio across all three interviews. Negative responses to participation as well as severity of IPA and PTSD symptoms did not predict retention at the next interview. These data demonstrate that studies asking about IPA experiences, even when survivors do not know in advance that IPA will be the focus of study, can be implemented within a stable benefit-to-cost ratio over time.
AllenN. E.LehrnerA.MattisonE.MilesT., & RussellA. (2007). Promoting systems change in the health care response to domestic violence. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(1), 103–120.
2.
CampbellR. & AdamsA. E. (2009). Why do rape survivors volunteer for face-to-face interviews?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(3), 395–405.
3.
CarlsonE. B.NewmanE.DanielsJ. W.ArmstrongJ.RothD., & LoewensteinR. (2003). Distress in response to and perceived usefulness of trauma research interviews. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 4(2), 131–142.
4.
ChuA. T.DePrinceA. P., & WeinzierlK. M. (2008). Children's perception of research participation: Examining trauma exposure and distress. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 49–58.
5.
DePrinceA. P.BelknapJ.LabusJ.BuckinghamS. E., & GoverA.R. (2012). The impact of victim-focused outreach on criminal legal system outcomes following police-reported intimate partner abuse. Violence against Women, in press.
6.
DePrinceA. P. & ChuA. T. (2008). Perceived benefits in trauma research: Examining methodological and individual difference factors in responses to research participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 35–47.
7.
DePrinceA. P. & FreydJ. J. (2004). Costs and benefits to research participants of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice, 4(3), 23–35.
8.
DePrinceA. P.LabusJ.BelknapJ.BuckinghamS., & GoverA. (2012). The impact of community-based outreach on psychological distress and victim safety in women exposed to intimate partner abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Advance online publication, February 13, doi: 10.1037/a0027224.
9.
FoaE. B.CashmanL.JaycoxL., & PerryK. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The posttraumatic diagnostic scale. Psychological Assessment, 9(4), 445–451.
10.
GreenB. L. (1996). Trauma history questionnaire. In StammB. H. & VarraE. E. (Eds.), Measurement of stress, self-report trauma, and adaptation. Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press.
11.
GriffinM. G.ResickP. A.WaldropA. E., & MechanicM. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm?Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(3), 221–227.
12.
Kassam-AdamsN. & NewmanE. (2005). Child and parent reactions to participation in clinical research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 27(1), 29–35.
13.
NewmanE. & KaloupekD. (2009). Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: Autonomy and beneficence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 595–602.
14.
NewmanE. & KaloupekD. G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(5), 383–394.
15.
NewmanE. & KaloupekD. (2001). Response to research participation questionnaire: Short form. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
NewmanE.WalkerE. A., & GeflandA. (1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21(3), 187–196.
17.
NewmanE.WillardT.SinclairR., & KaloupekD. (2001). The costs and benefits of research from the participants' view: The path to empirically informed research practice. Accountability in Research, 8, 27–47.
18.
RuzekJ. I. & ZatzickD. F. (2000). Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: An empirical investigation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22(1), 27–36.
19.
SchwerdtfegerK. L. (2009). The appraisal of quantitative and qualitative trauma-focused research procedures among pregnant participants. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 39–51.
20.
ShoreyR. C.CorneliusT. L., & BellK. M. (2011). Reactions to participating in dating violence research: Are our questions distressing participants?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(14), 2890–2907.
21.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS., & SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316.
22.
WalkerE. A.NewmanE.KossM., & BernsteinD. (1997). Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims?General Hospital Psychiatr y, 19(6), 403–410.
