Case-Based Ethics Education: The Impact of Cause Complexity and Outcome Favorability on Ethicality

Abstract

Case-based learning has been used across multiple disciplines, including ethics education, as an effective instructional tool. However, the value of case-based learning in ethics education has varied widely regarding case quality. Case content may significantly impact the ability of case-based ethics education to promote knowledge acquisition and knowledge transfer to future situations requiring ethical decision-making. This study examined two critical areas of ethical case content—causes and outcomes. Complexity of described causes and outcome favorability were manipulated in two ethical cases used during an ethics education course. Results suggest that including information in case studies reflecting clear, simple key causes and negative outcomes results in better ethical sensemaking and ethical decision-making. Implications regarding case content and case-based ethics education are explored.

Keywords

case-based learning case content sensemaking ethical decision-making cause complexity outcome favorability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antes

A. L.

Thiel

C. E.

Martin

L. E.

Stenmark

C. K.

Mumford

M. D.

Devenport

L. D.

, & Connelly

(2012). Reflection on past experience as a source of knowledge to inform ethical decision-making. Ethics and Behavior, 22(2), 113–130.

Atkinson

T. N.

(2008). Using creative writing techniques to enhance the case study method in research integrity and ethics courses. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 33–50.

Bagdasarov

Thiel

C. E.

Johnson

J. F.

Connelly

Harkrider

Devenport

L. D.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(in press). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Journal of Moral Education, forthcoming.

Brock

Vert

Kligyte

Waples

E. P.

Sevier

S. T.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2008). Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 449–472.

Connelly

M. S.

Gilbert

J. A.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Threlfall

K. V.

Marks

M. A.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 65–86.

Connelly

Allen

M. T.

, & Waples

(2007). The impact of content and structure on a case-based approach to developing leadership skills. International Journal of Learning and Change, 2(3), 218–249.

Dörner

& Schaub

(1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43(4), 433–453.

Falkenberg

& Woiceshyn

(2008). Enhancing business ethics: Using cases to teach moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 213–217.

Feldman

(2003). The simplicity principle in human concept learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(6), 227–232.

10.

Hammond

K. J.

(1990). Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14(3), 385–443.

11.

Harkrider

L. N.

Thiel

C. E.

Bagdasarov

Mumford

M. D.

Johnson

J. F.

Connelly

, & Devenport

L. D.

(2012). Improving case-based ethics training with codes of conduct and forecasting content. Ethics and Behavior, forthcoming. Available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508422.2012.661311.

12.

Hayes-Roth

& Hayes-Roth

(1979). A cognitive model of planning. In Collins

A. M.

& Smith

E. E.

(Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 496–513). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

13.

Herreid

C. F.

(1998). What makes a good case? Some basic rules of good storytelling help teachers generate student excitement in the classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(3), 163–165.

14.

Hershey

D. A.

Walsh

D. A.

Read

S. J.

, & Chulef

A. S.

(1990). The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(1), 77–102.

15.

Hogarth

R. M.

& Makridakis

(1981). Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Science, 27(2), 115–138.

16.

Kim

Phillips

W. R.

Pinsky

Brock

Phillips

, & Keary

(2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical Education, 40(9), 867–876.

17.

Kolodner

J. L.

(1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6(1), 3–34.

18.

Kolodner

J. L.

(1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52(1), 57–66.

19.

Kolodner

J. L.

& Simpson

R. L.

(1989). The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an early case-based problem solver. Cognitive Science, 13(4), 507–549.

20.

Kolodner

J. L.

Camp

P. J.

Crismond

Fasse

Gray

Holbrook

Puntambekar

, & Ryan

(2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.

21.

Kolodner

J. L.

Owensby

J. N.

, & Guzdial

(2004). Case-based learning aids. In Jonassen

D. H.

& Jonassen

D. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2nd ed. (pp. 829–861). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

22.

Lombrozo

(2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology, 55(3), 232–257.

23.

Lynn

(1999). Teaching and learning with cases: A guidebook. New York: Chatham House.

24.

Marcy

R. T.

& Mumford

M. D.

(2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 123–140.

25.

Martin

L. E.

Stenmark

C. K.

Thiel

C. E.

Antes

A. L.

Mumford

M. D.

Connelly

, & Devenport

L. D.

(2011). The influence of temporal orientation and affective frame on use of ethical decision-making strategies. Ethics and Behavior, 21(2), 127–146.

26.

Motowidlo

S. J.

Dunnette

M. D.

, & Carter

G. W.

(1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 640–647.

27.

Mumford

M. D.

(2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120.

28.

Mumford

M. D.

Connelly

Brown

R. P.

Murphy

S. T.

Hill

J. H.

Antes

A. L.

Waples

E. P.

, & Devenport

L. D.

(2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18(4), 315–339.

29.

Mumford

M. D.

Devenport

L. D.

Brown

R. P.

Connelly

M. S.

Murphy

S. T.

Hill

J. H.

, & Antes

A. L.

(2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16(4), 319–345.

30.

Mumford

M. D.

Friedrich

T. L.

Caughron

J. J.

, & Byrne

C. L.

(2007). Leader cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises? Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 515–543.

31.

Mumford

M. D.

Schultz

R. A.

, & Van Doorn

J. R.

(2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 213–240.

32.

Mumford

M. D.

& Van Doorn

J. R.

(2001). The leadership of pragmatism: Reconsidering Franklin in the age of charisma. Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 279–310.

33.

National Science Foundation. (2009). Case based reasoning and ethics instruction: Content and processing exercises for effective education, September 2. Retrieved April 2, 2012 from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0931539.

34.

Office of Extramural Research. (2008). Training in the responsible conduct of research, May 9. Retrieved March 22, 2012 from http://grants.nih.gov/training/responsibleconduct.htm.

35.

Patalano

A. L.

& Siefert

C. M.

(1997). Opportunistic planning: Being reminded of pending goals. Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 1–36.

36.

Sonenshein

(2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.

37.

Stenmark

C. K.

Antes

A. L.

Thiel

C. E.

Caughron

J. J.

Xiaoqian

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2011). Consequences identification in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 25–32.

38.

Stenmark

C. K.

Antes

A. L.

Wang

Caughron

J. J.

Thiel

C. E.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20(2), 110–127.

39.

Thiel

C. E.

Connelly

Harkrider

Devenport

L. D.

Bagdasarov

Johnson

J. F.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2011). Case-based knowledge and ethics education: Improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, forthcoming. Online First available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/n25386180q734631/.

40.

Thomas

J. B.

Clark

S. M.

, & Gioia

D. A.

(1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270.

41.

Vincent

A. S.

Decker

B. P.

, & Mumford

M. D.

(2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 163–178.

42.

Weick

K. E.

(1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305–317.

43.

Weick

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

44.

Werhane

P. H.

(2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1–2), 33–42.

45.

Xiao

Milgram

, & Doyle

D. J.

(1997). Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: Results of a field study. In Zsambok

C. E.

& Klein

(Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 197–205). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.