Improving Informed Consent with Minority Participants: Results from Researcher and Community Surveys

Abstract

Strengthening the informed consent process is one avenue for improving recruitment of minorities into research. This study examines that process from two different perspectives, that of researchers and that of African American and Latino community members. Through the use of two separate surveys, we compared strategies used by researchers with the preferences and attitudes of community members during the informed consent process. Our data suggest that researchers can improve the informed consent process by incorporating methods preferred by the community members along with methods shown in the literature for increasing comprehension. With this approach, the informed consent process may increase both participants' comprehension of the material and overall satisfaction, fostering greater trust in research and openness to future research opportunities.

Keywords

informed consent minorities improving informed consent

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ard

J. D.

Durant

R. W.

Edwards

L. C.

, & Svetkey

L. P.

(2005). Perceptions of African-American culture and implications for clinical trial design. Ethnicity and Disease, 15(2), 292–299.

Barrett

(2005). Quality of informed consent: Measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(4), 751–755.

California Health Interview Survey. (2009). CHIS 2007 methodology series: Report 4—response rates. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

Cohn

& Larson

(2007). Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(3), 273–280.

Corbie-Smith

Thomas

S. B.

, & St. George

D. M.

(2002). Distrust, race, and research. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(21), 2458–2463.

Corbie-Smith

Thomas

S. B.

Williams

M. V.

, & Moody-Ayers

(1999). Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14(9), 537–546.

Cortes

D. E.

Drainoni

M. L.

Henault

L. E.

, & Paasche-Orlow

M. K.

(2010). How to achieve informed consent for research from Spanish-speaking individuals with low literacy: A qualitative report. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl. 2), 172–182.

Coyne

C. A.

Raich

Plomer

Dignan

Wenzel

L. B.

. (2003). Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 836–842.

Criscione

L. G.

Sugarman

Sanders

Pisetsky

D. S.

, & St. Clair

E. W.

, (2003). Informed consent in a clinical trial of a novel treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(3), 361–367.

10.

Davis

T. C.

Holcombe

R. F.

Berkel

H. J.

Pramanik

, & Divers

S. G.

(1998). Informed consent for clinical trials: A comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(9), 668–674.

11.

Dunlop

A. L.

Leroy

Z. C.

Logue

K. M.

Glanz

, & Dunlop

B. W.

(2011). Preconsent education about research processes improved African Americans' willingness to participate in clinical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(8), 872–877.

12.

Eder

M. L.

Yamokoski

A. D.

Wittmann

P. W.

, & Kodish

E. D.

(2007). Improving informed consent: Suggestions from parents of children with leukemia. Pediatrics, 119(4), e849–859.

13.

Farmer

D. F.

Jackson

S. A.

Camacho

, & Hall

M. A.

(2007). Attitudes of African American and low socioeconomic status white women toward medical research. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18(1), 85–99.

14.

Federal Plain Language Guidelines. (2011). Federal plain language guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/quickreference/checklist.cfm.

15.

Flory

& Emanuel

(2004). Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(13), 1593–1601.

16.

Freimuth

V. S.

Quinn

S. C.

Thomas

S. B.

Cole

Zook

, & Duncan

(2001). African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Social Science and Medicine, 52(5), 797–808.

17.

Fricker

Galesic

Tourangeau

, & Yan

(2005). An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(3), 370–392.

18.

Galesic

& Bosnjak

(2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360.

19.

Joffe

Cook

E. F.

Cleary

P. D.

Clark

J. W.

, & Weeks

J. C.

(2001). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 358(9295), 1772–1777.

20.

Lakes

K. D.

Vaughan

Jones

Burke

Baker

, & Swanson

J. M.

(2012). Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: Implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1–2), 215–232.

21.

Paasche-Orlow

M. K.

Taylor

H. A.

, & Brancati

F. L.

(2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8), 721–726.

22.

Penman

D. T.

Holland

J. C.

Bahna

G. F.

Morrow

Schmale

A. H.

Derogatis

L. R.

. (1984). Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: Patients' and physicians' perceptions. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2(7), 849–855.

23.

Philippe

Meney

Larrazet

Abderrazak

Ben F.

Dibie

Meziane

. (2006). Effects of video information in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, 99(2), 95–101.

24.

Ryan

R. E.

Prictor

M. J.

McLaughlin

K. J.

, & Hill

S. J.

(2008). Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, 1, Article No. CD003717.

25.

Sellars

Garza

M. A.

Fryer

C. S.

, & Thomas

S. B.

(2010). Utilization of health care services and willingness to participate in future medical research: The role of race and social support. Journal of the National Medical Association, 102(9), 776–786.

26.

Simon

C. M.

& Kodish

E. D.

(2005). “Step into my zapatos, doc”: Understanding and reducing communication disparities in the multicultural informed consent setting. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(1 Suppl.), S123–138.

27.

Sudore

R. L.

Landefeld

C. S.

Williams

B. A.

Barnes

D. E.

Lindquist

, & Schillinger

(2006). Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: A descriptive study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(8), 867–873.

28.

Thomas

S. B.

Quinn

S. C.

Butler

Fryer

C. S.

, & Garza

M. A.

(2011). Toward a fourth generation of disparities research to achieve health equity. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 399–416.

29.

Thorne

(1980). “You still takin' notes?” Fieldwork and problems of informed consent. Social Problems, 27(3), 284–297.

30.

University of California, San Francisco. (2008). The John D. and Katherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Research Network on SES & Health. Retrieved from http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/usladder.php.

31.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45 Public Welfare, Department of Health and Human Services Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#46.117.

32.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Analysis and proposed actions regarding the NBAC Report: Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision making capacity, Appendix C. Prepared by HHS Working Group on the NBAC Report. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/sp/nbac/appendixc.shtml.