Social and Structural Constraints on Disclosure and Informed Consent for HIV Survey Research Involving Female Sex Workers and Their Bar Managers in the Philippines
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2014
Social and Structural Constraints on Disclosure and Informed Consent for HIV Survey Research Involving Female Sex Workers and Their Bar Managers in the Philippines
This qualitative study explored the ethical issues of female sex workers' (FSWs) participation in HIV prevention research. Twenty female bar/spa workers and 10 venue managers in the Philippines underwent individual semi-structured interviews; three community advisory board meetings informed the study design and interpretation of findings. Results: Informed consent was constrained by perceived government coercion and skepticism that research results would translate into community benefits. Disclosure was constrained by distrust in confidentiality and perceived intrusiveness of survey questions. FSWs and managers were frustrated by the government's inability to stop police from using condoms as evidence of prostitution. Findings suggest HIV interventions move beyond didactic prevention workshops to include FSWs in intervention design and implementation, and to reduce social and structural constraints on participation.
AgustinL. M. (2004). Alternate ethics, or telling lies to researchers. Research for Sex Work, 7, 6–7.
2.
AndandaP. (2009). Vulnerability: Sex workers in Nairobi's Majengo slum. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18, 138–146.
3.
CampbellC., & CornishF. (2012). How can community health programmes build enabling environments for transformative communication? Experiences from India and South Africa. AIDS and Behavior, 16(4), 847–857.
4.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Congress of the Philippines (May 26, 2003). Republic Act Number 9208. An act to institute policies to eliminate trafficking in persons especially women and children, establishing the necessary institutional mechanisms for the protection and support of trafficked persons, providing penalties for its violations, and for other. Retrieved from www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2003/ra_9208_2003.html.
5.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CwikelJ., & HobanE. (2005). Contentious issues in research on trafficked women working in the sex industry: Study design, ethics, and methodology. Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 306–316.
7.
DitmoreM. H., & AllmanD. (2011). “Who is Helsinki?” Sex workers advise improving communication for good participatory practice in clinical trials. Health Education Research, 26(3), 466–475.
8.
FawkesJ. (2005). Community and research partnerships: Improving community engagement and productive research outcomes for sex worker communities. Pan Pacific Regional HIV/AIDS Conference 2005 Conference Handbook and Abstracts 1:94.
9.
FisherC. B. (2011). Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: Do drug users have a different moral voice?Substance Use & Misuse, 46(6), 728–741.
10.
FisherC. B.OranskyM.MahadevanM.SingerM.MirhejG., & HodgeD. (2008). Marginalized populations and drug addiction research: Realism, mistrust, and misconception. IRB, 30(3), 1–9.
MetzenrathS. (1998). In touch with the needs of sex workers. Research for Sex Work, 1, 11.
14.
OranskyM.FisherC. B.MahadevanM., & SingerM. (2009). Barriers and opportunities for recruitment for non-intervention studies on HIV risk: Perspectives of street drug users. Substance Use & Misuse, 44, 1642–1659.
15.
Philippines Dangerous Drugs Board (2008). Study on the current nature and extent of drug abuse in the Philippines. Manila: Republic of the Philippines, Office of the President.
16.
RhodesT. (2002). The “risk environment”: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(2), 85–94.
17.
RhodesT. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm reduction approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(3), 193–201.
18.
SandersT. (2006). Sexing up the subject: Methodological nuances in researching the female sex industry. Sexualities, 9(4), 449–468.
19.
ShannonK., & CseteJ. (2010). Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among sex workers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(5), 573–574.
20.
ShaverF. (2005). Sex work research: Methodological and ethical challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 296–319.
21.
SilvermanJ. G.RajA.ChengD. M.DeckerM. R.ColemanS.BriddenC. (2011). Sex trafficking and initiation-related violence, alcohol use, and HIV risk among HIV-infected female sex workers in Mumbai, India. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 204(Suppl 5), S1229–S1234.
UNAIDS/AVAC Global Advocacy for HIV prevention (2011). The good participatory practice (GPP) guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials (2nd ed.). Geneva: UNAIDS. Retrieved from www.avac.org/ht/d/sp/i/309/pid/309.
24.
UradaL. A.MoriskyD. E.HernandezL. I., & StrathdeeS. A. (2013). Social and structural factors associated with consistent condom use among female entertainment workers trading sex in the Philippines. AIDS and Behavior, 17(2), 523–535.
25.
UradaL. A.MoriskyD. E.Pimentel-SimbulanN.SilvermanJ. G., & StrathdeeS. A. (2012). Condom negotiations among female sex workers in the Philippines: Environmental influences. PLoS One, 7(3), 1–9.
26.
UradaL. A.StrathdeeS.A.MoriskyD. E.SchillingR. F.Pimentel-SimbulanN.EstacioL. R.Jr, & RajA. (2013). Sex work and its associations with alcohol and methamphetamine use among female bar and spa workers in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health. [Epub ahead of print.].
27.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979, 1998). Protection of human subjects: Belmont Report—Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Fed. Reg., 44(76), 23192–7 (April 18). www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ and www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/belmont.html (1998 update).
28.
UuskulaA.JohnstonL. G.RaagM.TrummalA.TaluA., & Des JarlaisD. C. (2010). Evaluating recruitment among female sex workers and injecting drug users at risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling in Estonia. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 304–317.
29.
van der MeulenA. (2011). Research with sex workers: Dismantling barriers and building bridges. Action Research, 9(4), 370–384.
