This article uses public debates over same-sex marriage in Hawaii to address gaps in the framing perspective on social movements. Drawing on both elite and nonelite discourses in the debates over same-sex marriage, the analysis demonstrates the dominance of the civil rights frame among supporters of same-sex marriage but finds that alternative discourses emerged among nonelite actors in response to evolving political conditions. Nonelite actors increasingly framed the issue as a question of tolerance and acceptance rather than rights. Opponents of same-sex marriage explicitly rejected the rights frame and countered with discourses of democracy and morality. This case highlights the impact of activist frames on broader public debates, but also the possibility of significant alternative frames that can only be discovered through attention to nonelite discourses. The case also suggests that dominant master frames that inform the discourses of social movements may constrain the framing efforts of activists within specific issue domains.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabstGordon A.1997. “Community, Rights Talk, and the Communitarian Dissent in Bowers v. Hardwick”. Pp. 139–72 in Playing with Fire: Queer Politics, Queer Theories, edited by PhelanS., New York: Routledge.
2.
BenfordRobert D.1997. “An Insider's Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective.”Sociological Inquiry67: 409–30.
3.
BuellEmmett H.Jr., 1975. “Eccentrics or Gladiators? People Who Write about Politics in Letters to the Editor.”Social Science Quarterly56: 440–49.
4.
BumillerKristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
ChristiansenJeanKresnakWilliam. 1998. “Mormons Give Big to Fight Same-Sex.”Honolulu Advertiser, October 24.
6.
EskridgeWilliam N.Jr., 1996. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York: Free Press.
7.
EttelbrickPaula L.1992. “Since When Is Marriage a Path to Liberation?” Pp. 20–26 in Lesbian and Gay Marriage: Private Commitments, Public Ceremonies, edited by ShermanS., Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8.
FerreeMyra MarxMillerFrederick D., 1985. “Mobilization and Meaning: Toward an Integration of Social Psychological and Resource Perspectives on Social Movements.”Sociological Inquiry55: 38–61.
9.
GamsonWilliam A.1992. “The Social Psychology of Collective Action.” Pp. 53–76 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA. D.MillerC. M., New Haven: Yale University Press.
10.
GlendonMary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.
11.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Goldberg-HillerJonathan. 1999a. Personal communication with the author, June 11.
13.
Goldberg-HillerJonathan. 1999b. “The Status of Status: Domestic Partnership and the Politics of Same-Sex Marriage.”Studies in Law, Politics, and Society19: 3–38.
14.
GreyDavid L.BrownTrevor R., 1970. “Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public Opinion.”Journalism Quarterly47: 450–56, 471.
15.
HartStephen. 1996. “The Cultural Dimension of Social Movements: A Theoretical Reassessment and Literature Review.”Sociology of Religion57: 87–100.
16.
HerbstSusan. 1993. Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
HillDavid B.1981. “Letter Opinion on the ERA: A Test of the Newspaper Bias Hypothesis.”Public Opinion Quarterly45: 384–92.
18.
HonigBonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19.
HughesRobert. 1993. Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
JasperJames M.1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
LevinDaniel. 1997. “The Constitution as Rhetorical Symbol in Western Anti-Gay Rights Initiatives: The Case of Idaho.” Pp. 33–49 in Anti-Gay Rights: Assessing Voter Initiatives, edited by WittS. L.McCorkleS., Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
McAdamDoug. 1994. “Culture and Social Movements.” Pp. 36–57 in New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, edited by LarañaE.JohnstonH.GusfieldJ. R., Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
McAdamDoug. 1996. “The Framing Function of Movement Tactics: Strategic Dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights Movement.” Pp. 338–55 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N., 1996. “Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes—Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements.” Pp. 1–20 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
McCannMichael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N., 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82: 1212–41.
27.
McCorkleSuzanneMostMarshall G., 1997. “Fear and Loathing on the Editorial Page: An Analysis of Idaho's Anti-Gay Initiative.” Pp. 63–76 in Anti-Gay Rights: Assessing Voter Initiatives, edited by WittS. L.McCorkleS., Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
MinowMartha. 1987. “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover.”Yale Law Journal96: 1860–1915.
29.
MorrisRobert J.1996. “Configuring the Bo(u)nds of Marriage: The Implications of Hawaiian Culture and Values for the Debate about Homogamy.”Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities8: 105–59.
30.
PollettaFrancesca. 1997. “Culture and Its Discontents: Recent Theorizing on the Cultural Dimensions of Protest.”Sociological Inquiry67: 431–50.
31.
SchacterJane S.1994. “The Gay Civil Rights Debate in the States: Decoding the Discourse of Equivalents.”Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review29: 283–317.
32.
ScheingoldStuart. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33.
SchudsonMichael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.
34.
SigelmanLeeWalkoszBarbara J., 1992. “Letters to the Editor as a Public Opinion Thermometer: The Martin Luther King Holiday Vote in Arizona.”Social Science Quarterly73: 938–46.
35.
SowellThomas. 1984. Civil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality?New York: Morrow.
36.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D., 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.”International Social Movement Research1: 197–217.
37.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D., 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” Pp. 133–55 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA. D.MillerC. M.New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D., 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.”American Sociological Review51: 464–81.
39.
State of Hawaii. 1993. General Population and Housing Characteristics for the State of Hawaii: 1990. Hawaii State Data Center Report No. 6. Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism, Information Resources Management Division.
40.
SteeleShelby. 1990. The Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race in America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
41.
SteinArlenePlummerKen. 1994. “‘I Can't Even Think Straight’: ‘Queer’ Theory and the Missing Revolution in Sociology.”Sociological Theory12: 178–87.
42.
SteinbergMarc W.1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners.”American Journal of Sociology105: 736–80.
43.
SullivanAndrew. 1995. Virtually Normal: An Argument about Homosexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
44.
SykesCharles J.1992. A Nation of Victims: The Decay of the American Character. New York: St. Martin's Press.
45.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1998. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1998. 118th ed.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
46.
VaidUrvashi. 1995. Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation. New York: Anchor Books.
47.
VolgyThomas J.KrigbaumMargaretLanganMary KayMoshierVicky. 1977. “Some of My Best Friends Are Letter Writers: Eccentrics and Gladiators Revisited.”Social Science Quarterly58: 321–27.
48.
“Voters Strongly Oppose Gay Unions.”1997. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, February 24.
49.
WarnerMichael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: Free Press.
50.
WebbEugene J.CampbellDonald T.SchwartzRichard D.SechrestLee. 1966. Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
YuenMike. 1998a. “55% Favor Ban on Same-Sex.”Honolulu Star-Bulletin, October 31.
53.
YuenMike. 1998b. “Same-Sex Marriage Losing Big.”Honolulu Star-Bulletin, August 14.
54.
ZaldMayer N.1996. “Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing.” Pp. 261–74 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Cases.
56.
Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P2d 44 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1993).
