Although the concept of cultural capital has been widely adopted in sociological studies of culture, education, and stratification, few studies have addressed the processes through which specific instantiations of cultural capital become important in particular institutional locations. This article, based on an analysis of primary documents relating to changes in admissions policies at Harvard College between 1945 and 1965, addresses the question of how nonacademic factors came to have such a significant role in undergraduate admissions at elite American universities. It argues that in relatively autonomous fields such as higher education in the mid–twentieth century United States, cultural capital is shaped not only by the relations of cultural qualities and economic classes but also through specific intra- and extra-institutional struggles within the field in question.
BedermanGail1995. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BenderWilbur1949. “To the Critics of Harvard.”Harvard Alumni Bulletin, April.
4.
BenderWilbur1953. “The Committees on Admission and on Scholarships and Financial Aids.”Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
5.
BenderWilbur1954. Report on the Office of the Dean of Admissions and Financial Aids for Students in Harvard College for the Academic Year 1953–54. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
6.
BenderWilbur1955. Report on the Office of the Dean of Admissions and Financial Aids for Students in Harvard College for the Academic Year 1954–55. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
7.
BenderWilbur1958. Report on the Admission and Scholarship Committee for the Academic Year 1957–58. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
8.
BenderWilbur1960. Final Report of W. J. Bender Chairman of the Admission and Scholarship Committee and Dean of Admissions and Financial Aids, 1952–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
9.
BourdieuPierre1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans. NiceR., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BourdieuPierre1996a. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11.
BourdieuPierre1996b. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Trans. CloughL. C., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuPierre1997. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 46–58 in Education: Culture, Economy, and Society, edited by HalseyA. H.LauderH.BrownP.WellA. S., New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
BrooksDavid2000. Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There. New York: Simon & Schuster.
14.
BuckNorman S.1950. “What Kind of Boy Does Yale Want?”Yale Alumni Magazine, November.
15.
BuckPaul1946. “Balance in the College.”Harvard Alumni Bulletin48: 404–06.
16.
BuckPaul1948. “Who Comes to Harvard?”Harvard Alumni Bulletin50: 313–17.
17.
ChungJuliet J.2000. “What Gives You an Edge? Meritocracy's Last Stand.”Harvard Crimson, June 8.
18.
ConnellR. W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
CooksonPeter W.Jr.PersellCaroline Hodges. 1985. Preparing for Power: America's Elite Boarding Schools. New York: Basic Books.
20.
D'EmilioJohn. 1989. “The Homosexual Menace: The Politics of Sexuality in Cold War America.” Pp. 226–40 in Passion and Power: Sexuality in History, edited by PeissK.SimmonsC., Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
DiMaggioPaul1982. “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth Century Boston: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America.”Media, Culture and Society4: 33–50.
22.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter W.1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” Pp. 63–82 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by DiMaggioP.PowellW. W., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
DyerHenry S.1946. “Harvard's Statistical Underground: How the G.S.O. Finds Vital Student Data for the College Office.”Harvard Alumni Bulletin, April: 521–24.
24.
EpsteinBarbara1994. “Anti-Communism, Homophobia, and the Construction of Masculinity in the Postwar U.S.”Critical Sociology20: 21–44.
25.
FarnumRichard1997. “Elite College Discrimination and the Limits of Conflict Theory.”Harvard Educational Review67 (3): 507–30.
26.
FeldmanPenny Hollander1988. Recruiting an Elite: Admission to Harvard College. New York: Garland Publishing.
27.
FetterJean H.1995. Questions and Admissions: Reflections on 100,000 Admissions Decisions at Stanford. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
GlimpFred L.1964. Admission and Scholarship Committee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
29.
GlimpFred L.1965. Report on the Admission and Scholarship Committee for the Academic Year 1964–65. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
30.
HartJohn Goddard1912. Report of the Chairman of the Committee on Admission. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
31.
Harvard Alumni Bulletin. 1948. “Scholarships and Schools.”51: 75–76.
32.
HearnJames C.1991. “Academic and Nonacademic Influences on the College Destinations of 1980 High School Graduates.”Sociology of Education64: 158–71.
33.
HernandezMichele A.1997. A is for Admission: The Insider's Guide to Getting into the Ivy League and Other Top Colleges. New York: Warner Books.
34.
JencksChristopherRiesmanDavid. 1968. The Academic Revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
35.
JohnsonDavid K.2004. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
KarabelJerome1984. “Status-Group Struggle, Organizational Interests, and the Limits of Institutional Autonomy: The Transformation of Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, 1918– 1940.”Theory and Society13: 1–40.
37.
KarabelJerome2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
38.
KarenDavid1985. Who Gets into Harvard? Selection and Exclusion at an Elite College. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
39.
KarenDavid1990. “Toward a Political-Organizational Model of Gatekeeping: The Case of Elite Colleges.”Sociology of Education63: 227–40.
40.
KarenDavid1991. “‘Achievement’ and ‘Ascription’ in Admission to an Elite College: A Political Organizational Analysis.”Sociological Forum6: 349–80.
41.
LamontMichele1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
LamontMicheleLareauAnnette. 1988. “Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Developments.”Sociological Theory6: 153–68.
43.
LareauAnnetteWeiningerElliot B.2003. “Cultural Capital in Educational Research: A Critical Assessment.”Theory and Society32: 567–606.
44.
LemannNicholas1999. The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
45.
ManzaJeff1992. “Classes, Status Groups, and Social Closure: A Critique of Neo-Weberian Social Theory.”Current Perspectives in Social Theory12: 275–302.
46.
New York Times. 1967. “Ivy's Admissions Irk Prep Schools. April 30.
47.
PaulBill1995. Getting in: Inside the College Admissions Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M.1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.”American Sociological Review61: 900–07.
49.
RiesmanDavid1975. “Educational Reform at Harvard College: Meritocracy and its Adversaries.” Pp. 281–392 in Education and Politics at Harvard, edited by LipsetS. M.RiesmanD., New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.
SchudsonMichael1972. “Organizing the ‘Meritocracy’: A History of the College Entrance Examination Board.”Harvard Educational Review42: 34–69.
51.
ShulmanJames L.BowenWilliam G.2001. The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Special Committee on College Admission Policy. 1960. Admission to Harvard College. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
53.
SwartzDavid1997. Culture & Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
SwidlerAnn2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
SynnottMarcia Graham1979. The Half-Opened Door: Discrimination and Admissions at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, 1900–1970. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
56.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2002. Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, 2002. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/dt171.asp.
57.
UseemMichaelKarabelJerome. 1990. “Pathways to Top Corporate Management.” Pp. 175–207 in The High Status Track: Studies of Elite Schools and Stratification, edited by KingstonP. W.LewisL., Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
von StadeFrancis SkiddyJr.1946. “‘Poore Schollers' and Good Students: The How and Why of Harvard's Scholarship Program.”Harvard Alumni Bulletin May: 657–60.
59.
WhitlaDean K.1965. “Admission to College: Policy and Practice.”Phi Delta KappanXLVI: 303–06.
60.
WillinghamWarren W.BrelandHunter M.1982. Personal Qualities and College Admissions. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
61.
YoungMichael Dunlop1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870–2033; An Essay on Education and Equality. London: Thames and Hudson.
