Endografting Increases Total Volume of AAA Repairs but Not at the Expense of Open Surgery: Experience in More Than 1000 Patients

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the volume of open graft replacements (OGR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) versus endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) over time and after modifying selection criteria.

Methods:

A review was conducted of 1021 consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from 1989 through 2002: 496 elective OGRs for infrarenal AAAs (STANDARD), 289 elective EVARs for infrarenal AAAs, 59 complex OGRs for suprarenal AAAs, and 177 emergent OGRs for ruptured AAAs. Patients from 1995 to 2002 were divided into 2 groups based on shifting treatment strategies; 454 patients were treated by STANDARD or EVAR at the surgeon's discretion between 1995 and 2000 (post EVAR). The second group comprised 161 patients treated in 2001–2002 after the introduction of “high-risk” screening criteria (age ≥72 years, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, impaired pulmonary function, or ASA class IV) that dictated EVAR whenever anatomically feasible. For comparison, 170 STANDARD repairs performed in the 6 years prior to EVAR served as a control.

Results:

While surgery for ruptured AAAs remained fairly stable over the 14-year period, the number of patients undergoing elective repair increased due to the implementation of EVAR. During the 6 years after its introduction, EVAR averaged 34.3 patients per year; after 2001, the annual frequency of EVAR increased to 41.5 (p>0.05). In like fashion, the rate of STANDARD repairs increased to 41.3 patients per year versus 28.3 before EVAR (p=0.032). ASA class IV patients increased by almost 9 fold in the recent period versus pre EVAR (p= 0.006). The overall mortality after elective infrarenal AAA repair decreased between the pre and post EVAR periods (6.5% versus 3.7%, p>0.05) and fell still further to 1.2% in the most recent period (p=0.021 versus pre EVAR).

Conclusions:

The implementation of an EVAR program increases the total volume of AAA repairs but does not reduce open surgical procedures. By allocating patients to EVAR or open repair based their risk factors, mortality was markedly reduced.

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair surgery comparative study mortality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pleumeekers

Hoes

van der Does

. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 1291–1299.

Singh

Bonaa

Jacobsen

. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: The Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 236–244.

Parodi

Palmaz

Barone

. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991; 5: 491–499.

Volodos

Karpovich

Troyan

. Clinical experience of the use of self-fixing synthetic prostheses for remote endoprosthetics of the thoracic and the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries through the femoral artery and as intraoperative endoprosthesis for aorta reconstruction. Vasa Suppl. 1991; 33: 93–95.

Blum

Voshage

Lammer

. Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 13–20.

Zarins

Wolf

Lee

. Will endovascular repair replace open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? Ann Surg. 2000; 232: 501–507.

Prinssen

Verhoeven

ELG

Buth

. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1607–1618.

Greenhalgh

Brown

Kwong

. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364: 843–848.

Sullivan

Taylor

Blackhurst

. Has endovascular surgery reduced the number of open vascular operations performed by an established surgical practice? J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 514–519.

10.

Sternbergh

York

Conners

. Trends in aortic aneurysm surgical training for general and vascular surgery residents in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 685–689.

11.

Lin

Bush

Milas

. Impact of an endovascular program on the operative experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm in vascular fellowship and general surgery residency. Am J Surg. 2003; 186: 189–193.

12.

Teufelsbauer

Prusa

Wolff

. Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical operation in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms: A propensity score-adjusted analysis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 782–787.

13.

Joffe

Rosenbaum

. Invited commentary: Propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150: 327–333.

14.

Moore

Kashyap

Vescera

. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 298–308.

15.

Arko

Lee

Hill

. Impact of endovascular repair on open aortic aneurysm surgical training. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34: 885–891.

16.

Choi

Wyble

Rubin

. Evolution of vascular fellowship training in the new era of endovascular techniques. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: S106–110.

17.

Lederle

Johnson

Wilson

. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2968–2972.

18.

Marin

Hollier

Ellozy

. Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms: A ten-year experience with 817 patients. Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 586–595.