Transcranial Doppler Monitoring during Stenting of the Carotid Bifurcation: Evaluation of Two Different Distal Protection Devices in Preventing Embolization

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy of 2 emboli protection devices in preventing embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Methods:

The GuardWire distal occlusion system (n=19) and the distal FilterWire EX (n=12) were compared in 31 consecutive patients (24 men; mean age 71±10 years) monitored with transcranial Doppler for microembolic signals before, during, and after CAS. The choice of the protection device was based on availability and on the patency of the contralateral carotid artery.

Results:

The baseline characteristics were similar in the patients treated under protection from either device. Placement and retrieval of the protection device, stenting, and postdilation were technically successful in all patients. Two patients suffered a transient ischemic attack shortly after the procedure; no other adverse cardiovascular events occurred at 30 days. Compared to the GuardWire, the use of the FilterWire was associated with more microembolic signals during stent deployment (77.4±33.5 versus 1.07±1.94, p<0.0001), postdilation (63.9±21.0 versus 2.06±2.58, p<0.0001), and retrieval of the protection device (21.4±15.4 versus 10.9±8.3, p=0.051). Consequently, the total amount of microembolic signals during the procedure was higher when the filter device was employed (183.0±42.1 versus 31.7±12.0, p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

The distal occlusion device appears to be more effective than the filter in reducing distal embolization detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring.

Keywords

carotid stenosis carotid angioplasty carotid stenting transcranial Doppler ultrasonography intracranial embolism emboli protection devices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rothwell

Eliasziw

Gutnikov

. Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists' Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003; 361: 107–116.

Halliday

Mansfield

Marro

. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363: 1491–1502.

Wennberg

Lucas

Birkmeyer

. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: Trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1278–1281.

Ouriel

Hertzer

Beven

. Preprocedural risk stratification: Identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: 728–732.

Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): A randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357: 1729–1737.

Yadav

Wholey

Kuntz

. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1493–1501.

Ohki

Parodi

Veith

. Efficacy of a proximal occlusion catheter with reversal of flow in the prevention of embolic events during carotid artery stenting: An experimental analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: 504–509.

Diederich

Scheinert

Schmidt

. First clinical experiences with an endovascular clamping system for neuroprotection during carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 28: 629–633.

Henry

Polydorou

Henry

. Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the PercuSurge GuardWire System. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 61: 293–305.

10.

Ohki

Roubin

Veith

. Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: An ex vivo analysis. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30: 1034–1044.

11.

Al-Mubarak

Colombo

Gaines

. Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 841–846.

12.

Al-Mubarak

Roubin

Vitek

. Effect of distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1999–2002.

13.

Antonius Carotid Endarterectomy, Angioplasty, and Stenting Study Group. Transcranial Doppler monitoring in angioplasty and stenting of the carotid bifurcation. J Endovasc Ther. 2003; 10: 702–710.

14.

Ackerstaff

Suttorp

van den Berg

. Prediction of early cerebral outcome by transcranial Doppler monitoring in carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 41: 618–624.

15.

Schmidt

Diederich

Scheinert

. Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1966–1969.

16.

Vos

van den Berg

Ernst

. Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: Comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients. Radiology. 2005; 234: 493–499.

17.

DeBray

Baud

Dauzat

. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997; 7: 289–296.

18.

Ringelstein

Droste

Babikian

. Consensus of microembolus detection by TCD. International Consensus Group on Microembolus Detection. Stroke. 1998; 29: 725–729.

19.

Wholey

Al-Mubarak

Wholey

. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 60: 259–266.

20.

Kastrup

Groschel

Krapf

. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: A systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2003; 34: 813–819.

21.

Reimers

Schluter

Castriota

. Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: Results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med. 2004; 116: 217–222.

22.

Zahn

Ischinger

Mark

. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: Is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1769–1774.

23.

Schluter

Tubler

Steffens

. Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1007–1013.