Use of Dynamic Computed Tomography to Evaluate Pre- and Postoperative Aortic Changes in AAA Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Abstract

Purpose:

To utilize dynamic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) on pre- and postoperative endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients to characterize cardiac-induced aortic motion within the aneurysm neck, an essential EVAR sealing zone.

Methods:

Electrocardiographically-gated CTA datasets were acquired utilizing a 64-slice Philips Brilliance CT scanner on 15 consecutive pre- and postoperative AAA patients. Axial pulsatility measurements were taken at 2 clinically relevant levels within the aneurysm neck: 2 cm above the highest renal artery and 1 cm below the lowest renal artery. Changes in aortic area and diameter were determined.

Results:

Significant aortic pulsatility exists within the aneurysm neck during the cardiac cycle. Preoperative aortic area increased significantly, with a maximum increase of up to 12.5%. The presence of an endograft did not affect aortic pulsatility (p = NS). Postoperative area also changed significantly during a heart cycle, with a maximum increase of up to 14.5%. Diameter measurements demonstrated an identical pattern, with significant pre- and postoperative intracardiac pulsatility within and above the aneurysm neck (p<0.05). An increase in maximum diameter change up to 15% was evident.

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing EVAR experience aortic diameter changes within and above the aneurysm neck. The presence of an endograft does not abrogate this response to intracardiac pressure changes. Static CT imaging may not adequately identify patients with large aortic pulsatility, potentially resulting in endograft undersizing, stent-graft migration, intermittent type I endoleaks, and poor patient outcomes. The current standard regime of 10% to 15% oversizing based on static CT may be inadequate for some patients.

Keywords

dynamic CT computed tomography stent-graft endovascular aneurysm repair aortic motion aortic pulsation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Greenberg

Chuter

Sternbergh

. Zenith AAA endovascular graft: Intermediate-term results of the US multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 1209–1218.

Zarins

White

Schwarten

. AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29: 292–308.

Schumacher

Eckstein

Kallinowski

. Morphometry and classification in abdominal aortic aneurysms: Patient selection for endovascular and open surgery. J Endovasc Surg. 1997; 4: 39–44.

Green

. Patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: S67–S73.

Gomes

Davros

Zeman

. Preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: The value of helical and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 20: 367–375.

Filis

Arko

Rubin

. , Three-dimensional CT evaluation for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Quantitative assessment of the infrarenal aortic neck. Acta Chir Belg. 2003; 103: 81–86.

Napoli

Bargellini

Sardella

. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Contrast-enhanced US for missed endoleaks after endoluminal repair. Radiology. 2004; 233: 217–225.

Broeders

Blankensteijn

Olree

. Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: A prospective comparative study of spiral CT angiography, arteriography, and conventional CT imaging. J Endovasc Surg. 1997; 4: 252–261.

Alric

Hinchliffe

Wenham

. Lessons learned from the long-term follow-up of a first-generation aortic stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 367–373.

10.

Becquemin

Kelley

Zubilewicz

. Outcomes of secondary interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 298–305.

11.

Harris

Buth

. An update on the important findings from the EUROSTAR EVAR registry. Vascular. 2004; 12: 33–38.

12.

Laheij

Buth

Harris

. Need for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 1666–1673.

13.

van Marrewijk

Buth

Harris

. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35: 461–473.

14.

Parodi

Criado

Barone

. Endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair using a balloon-expandable stent-graft device: A progress report. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994; 8: 523–529.

15.

Parodi

Palmaz

Barone

. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991; 5: 491–499.

16.

Teutelink

Rutten

Muhs

. Pilot study of dynamic cine CT angiography for the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Implications for endograft treatment. J Endovasc Ther. 2006; 13: 139–144.

17.

Bland

Altman

. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307–310.

18.

van Herwaarden

Bartels

Muhs

. Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography of the aneurysm neck: Conformational changes during the cardiac cycle with possible consequences for endograft sizing and future design. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44: 22–28.

19.

van der Laan

Bartels

Bakker

. Suitability of 7 aortic stent-graft models for MRI-based surveillance. J Endovasc Ther. 2004; 11: 366–371.

20.

Sampaio

Panneton

Mozes

. Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Predictive factors. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004; 18: 621–628.

21.

Wilson

Lee

. The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 112–117.

22.

Imura

Yamamoto

Kanamori

. Non-invasive ultrasonic measurement of the elastic properties of the human abdominal aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 1986; 20: 208–214.