Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evaluating the Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound Measurements

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter for the determination of stent-graft sizes used in thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR).

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted of 71 IVUS measurements performed in 33 patients (17 men; mean age 69 years) undergoing endovascular repair for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). For comparison, an inanimate model of the aortic arch and the great vessels was created; 5 independent operators took multiple blinded IVUS measurements. Measurement accuracy is presented as the mean and coefficient of variance in percent.

Results:

In 47 (66%) of the 71 clinical measurements, IVUS yielded a value that was larger than the CT scan measurement; in 8 (11%), the difference was at least 5 mm. In the model, CT centerline measurements were accurate within a mean 0.3 mm (0.6%) of the actual diameter; IVUS measurements were accurate within a mean 1.4 mm (2.8%). Centerline IVUS measurements increased the accuracy to within 0.8 mm (1.8%) of the actual diameter.

Conclusion:

IVUS measurements of the thoracic aorta were larger than CT measurements 66% of the time. However, there are 2 concerns with IVUS: off-center measurements distort the image and tangential measurements on a curve do not reflect a true centerline diameter. Thus, off-center IVUS measurements or those taken in the tortuous portion of the aorta may not be as accurate as centerline CT measurements.

Keywords

intravascular ultrasound computed tomography thoracic aorta thoracic aortic aneurysm aneurysm model measurement accuracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

White

Donayre

Kopchok

. Vascular imaging before, during and after endovascular repair. World J Surg. 1996; 20: 622–629.

Beebe

. Imaging modalities for aortic endografting. J Endovasc Surg. 1997; 4: 111–123.

Fillinger

. New imaging techniques in endovascular surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79: 451–475.

White

Donayre

Kopchok

. Intravascular ultrasound: The ultimate tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm assessment and endovascular graft delivery. J Endovasc Surg. 1997; 4: 45–55.

Nolthenius

van den Berg

Moll

. The value of intraoperative intravascular ultrasound for determining stent graft size (excluding the abdominal aortic aneurysm) with a modular system. Ann Vasc Surg. 2000; 14: 311–317.

van Sambeek

Gussenhoven

van Overhagen

. Intravascular ultrasound in endovascular stent-grafts for peripheral aneurysm: A clinical study. J Endovasc Surg. 1998; 5: 106–112.

Garret

Abdullah

Hodgkiss

. Intravascular ultrasound aids in the performance of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 615–618.

van Essen

van der Lugt

Gussenhoven

. Intravascular ultrasonography allows accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: An in vitro validation study. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 347–353.

van Essen

Gussenhoven

van der Lugt

. Accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm by intravascular ultrasound: Validation with computed tomographic angiography. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29: 631–638.

10.

Zanchetta

Rigatelli

Pedon

. IVUS guidance of thoracic and complex abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft repairs using an intracardiac echocardiography probe: Preliminary report. J Endovasc Ther. 2003; 10: 218–226.

11.

Di Mario

Madretsma

Linker

. The angle of incidence of the ultrasonic beam: A critical factor for the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography. Am Heart J. 1993; 125: 442–448.