Multislice CT Angiography in the Follow-up of Fenestrated Endovascular Grafts: Effect of Slice Thickness on 2D and 3D Visualization of the Fenestration Stents

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts.

Methods:

Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63–86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of AAA were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen.

Results:

There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equal to or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality.

Conclusion:

Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.

Keywords

endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance multislice computed tomography slice thickness fenestrated stent-graft image quality visualization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Browne

Hartley

Purchas

. A fenestrated covered suprarenal aortic stent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999; 18: 445–449.

Stanley

Semmens

Lawrence-Brown

. Fenestration in endovascular grafts for aortic aneurysm repair: New horizons for preserving blood flow in branch vessels. J Endovasc Ther. 2001; 8: 16–24.

Anderson

Berce

Hartley

. Endoluminal aortic grafting with renal and superior mesenteric artery incorporation by graft fenestration. J Endovasc Ther. 2001; 8: 3–15.

Sun

Mwipatayi

Semmens

. Short to midterm outcomes of fenestrated endovascular grafts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A systematic review. J Endovasc Ther. 2006; 13: 747–753.

Rubin

Shiau

Leung

. Aorta and iliac arteries: Single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology. 2000; 215: 670–676.

Sun

Winder

Kelly

. CT virtual intravascular endoscopy of abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with suprarenal endovascular stent grafting. Abdom Imaging. 2003; 28: 580–587.

Sun

Winder

Kelly

. Diagnostic value of CT virtual intravascular endoscopy in aortic stent-grafting. J Endovasc Ther. 2004; 11: 13–25.

Sun

Allen

Nadkarni

. CT virtual intravascular endoscopy in the visualization of fenestrated stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2008; 15: 42–51.

Kyriakou

Kachelrie

Knaup

Krause

Kalender

. Impact of the z-flying focal spot in resolution and artefact behaviour for a 64-slice spiral CT scanner. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 1206–1215.

10.

Sun

Gallagher

. Multislice CT virtual intravascular endoscopy for abdominal aortic aneurysm stent grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004; 15: 961–970.

11.

Sun

Ferris

. Optimal scanning protocol of multislice CT virtual intravascular endoscopy in pre-aortic stent grafting: In vitro phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2006; 58: 310–316.

12.

Coles

Smail

Negus

. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1840–1845.

13.

Urban

Fishman

. Tailored helical CT evaluation of acute abdomen. Radiographics. 2000; 20: 725–749.

14.

Sun

Winder

Kelly

. Assessment of VIE image quality using helical CT angiography: In vitro phantom study. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004; 28: 3–12.

15.

Rydberg

Kopecky

Lalka

. Stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Pre-and postoperative evaluation with multislice helical CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25: 580–586.

16.

Armerding

Rubin

Beaulieu

. Aortic aneurysmal disease: Assessment of stent-graft treatment-CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology. 2000; 215: 138–146.

17.

Verdun

Theumann

Poletto

. Impact of the introduction of 16-row MDCT on image quality and patient dose: Phantom study and multi-centre survey. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 2866–2874.

18.

Semmens

Lawrence-Brown

Hartley

. Outcomes of fenestrated endografts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Western Australia (1997–2004). J Endovasc Ther. 2006; 13: 320–329.