Multidetector CTA in the Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Value of Different Reformation Techniques and Axial Source Images Compared with Selective Carotid Arteriography

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the role of 4 different reformation techniques and axial images from multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) versus selective carotid arteriography (SCA) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

Methods:

Imaging studies from 50 patients (43 men; mean age 70.3±8.0 years, range 51– 85) with known cerebrovascular disease who underwent MDCTA and SCA in a single university hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Axial images, multiplanar reformation (MPR), curved planar reformation (CPR), volume rendering threshold (VRT), and virtual angioscopy (VA) images were reviewed by 2 independent observers who were blinded to the results of SCA, which served as the gold standard. The degree of stenosis was categorized as 0%–49%, 50%–69%, or 70%–99%; a stenosis >70% was considered as hemodynamically significant.

Results:

Thirty-four hemodynamically significant stenoses were identified on SCA. The agreement with SCA images was good for both observers using axial CT images (κ=0.89 for observer 1 and 0.88 for observer 2); corresponding results for MPR and CPR were κ=0.91 and 0.92 for observer 1 and 0.88 and 0.91 for observer 2, respectively. VRT (κ=0.72 for observer 1 and 0.66 for observer 2) and VA (κ=0.74 for observer 1 and 0.70 for observer 2) showed a slightly inferior correlation with SCA images. Sensitivities for reformations and axial CT images were 100% each; corresponding specificities ranged from 85% to 95%.

Conclusion:

Axial images as well as all 4 reformation techniques agreed well with SCA in the grading of ICA stenosis.

Keywords

computed tomographic angiography carotid artery stenosis reformations angiography volume rendering virtual angioscopy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1991;337:1235–1243.

Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453.

Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–1428.

Koelemey

Nederkoorn

Reitsma

. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke. 2004;35:2306–2312.

Hollingworth

Nathens

Kanne

. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2003;48:88–102.

Garmer

Hennigs

Jáger

. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:75–80.

Bartlett

Walters

Symons

. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:13–19.

Patel

Collie

Wardlaw

. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:212–218.

Anzalone

Scomazzoni

Castellano

. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology. 2005;236:204–213.

10.

Elgersma

Wüst

Buijs

. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2000;216:511–516.

11.

Nederkoorn

Elgersma

Mali

. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:806–813.

12.

Pan

Saloner

Reilly

. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:82–89.

13.

Bartylla

Huber

Angiographic quantification of stenoses of the internal carotid artery [in German]. Radiologe. 1995;35:801–807.

14.

Alexandrov

Bladin

Maggisano

. Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal. Stroke. 1993;24:1292–1296.

15.

Schulte-Altedorneburg

Droste

Kollár

. Measuring carotid artery stenosis–comparison of postmortem arteriograms with the planimetric gold standard. J Neurol. 2005;252: 575–582.

16.

Lee

Tsai

. Demonstration of extensive mesenteric venous thrombosis and intestinal infarction with multidetector row CT: value of curved planar reformations. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:775–777.

17.

Takase

Sawamura

Igarashi

. Demonstration of the artery of Adamkiewicz at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2002;223:39–45.

18.

Prokesch

Coulam

Chow

. CT angiography of the subclavian artery: utility of curved planar reformations. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:199–201.

19.

Puchner

Stadler

Minar

. Multidetector CT angiography in the follow-up of patients treated with renal artery stents: value of different reformation techniques compared with axial source images. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:387–394.

20.

Ferencik

Ropers

Abbara

. Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology. 2007;243:696–702.

21.

Dai

Bai

. Coronary artery stenoses: a phantom study using contrast enhanced three-dimensional electron beam tomography. Clin Imaging. 2001;25:95–100.