Estimation of Transpalatal Nasalance during Production of Voiced Stop Consonants by Noncleft Speakers Using an Oral-Nasal Mask

Abstract

Objective:

Our objective was to estimate nasalance due to transpalatal transfer of acoustic energy during production of voiced stop consonants by noncleft speakers. We also determined the relationship between the transpalatal nasalance and fundamental frequency (F0) of the speakers.

Method:

Participants were 8 men and 10 women (mean age = 21.9 years, SD = 4.0) without cleft palate who produced voiced stop (/b d g/) and nasal (/m n η/) consonants in syllables embedded in a carrier phrase. Participants also read the Zoo Passage. A divided OroNasal Nasality System mask was used to simultaneously obtain acoustic nasalance and airflow during production of the consonants. Both F0-derived and first formant (F1)–derived nasalance were computed.

Results:

F0-derived and F1-derived peak nasalance across all speakers ranged from a low of 20% to a high of 80% during production of stop consonants. An estimate of error from the combined sources of transoral transfer of energy (5%) and acoustic crossover between microphones (15%) was no greater than 20%. Analysis of variance revealed no significant effects of the sex of the speakers for either F0-derived or F1-derived nasalance of stops. There was a significant effect of the place of stop production for F0-derived nasalance (p;th< .05). Nonsignificant but positive correlations were found between the F0 of the speakers and F0-derived (r = .25) and F1-derived (r = .45) nasalance.

Conclusions:

Transpalatal transfer of oral acoustic energy accounts for most nasalance obtained during production of voiced stop consonants by noncleft speakers. F1-derived nasalance appears to better reflect transpalatal effects. Clinical implications are discussed.

Keywords

nasalance transpalatal nasalance velopharyngeal closure voiced stop consonants

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreassen

M.L.

, Smith

B.E.

, Guyette

T.W.

. Pressure-flow measurements for selected oral and nasal sound segments produced by normal adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 1–9.

Bell-Berti

. Understanding velic motor control: studies of segmental context. In: Huffman

M.K.

, Krakow

R.A.

, eds. Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 5: Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993: 63–85.

Dalston

R.M.

, Warren

D.W.

, Dalston

E.T.

. The identification of nasal obstruction through clinical judgments of hyponasality and nasometric assessment of speech acoustics. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 100: 59–65.

Fisher

K.V.

, Swank

P.R.

. Estimating phonation threshold pressure. J Speech Hear Res. 1997; 40: 1122–1129.

Fletcher

S.G.

. Theory and instrumentation for quantitative measurement of nasality. Cleft Palate J. 1970; 7: 601–609.

Fletcher

S.G.

. Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality. J Speech Hear Dis. 1972; 37: 329–346.

Fletcher

S.G.

. Diagnosing Speech Disorders From Cleft Palate. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1978: 92–157.

Fletcher

S.G.

, Adams

L.E.

, McCutcheon

M.J.

. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. In: Bzoch

K.R.

, ed. Communictive Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little Brown; 1989: 246–257.

Gildersleeve-Neumann

C.E.

, Dalston

R.M.

. Nasalance scores in noncleft individuals: why not zero? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38: 106–111.

10.

Glottal Enterprises, Inc. OroNasal Nasality User Manual. Syracuse: 2002.

11.

Hardin

M.A.

, Van Demark

D.R.

, Morris

H.L.

, Payne

M.M.

. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality. Cleft Palate J. 1992; 29: 346–351.

12.

Hoit

J.D.

, Watson

P.J.

, Hixon

K.E.

, McMahon

, Johnson

C.L.

. Age and velopharyngeal function during speech production. J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37: 295–302.

13.

Krakow

R.A.

, Huffman

M.K.

. Instruments and techniques for investigating nasalization and velopharyngeal function in the laboratory: an introduction. In: Huffman

M.K.

, Krakow

R.A.

, eds. Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 5: Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993: 3–59.

14.

Leeper

H.A.

, Rochet

A.P.

, MacKay

I.R.

. Characteristics of nasalance in Canadian speakers of English and French. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada; 1992; 1: 49–52.

15.

Lewis

K.E.

, Watterson

, Quint

. The effect of vowels on nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 584–589.

16.

MacKay

I.R.

, Kummer

A.W.

. Simplified nasometric assessment procedures: the MacKay-Kummer SNAP test. Kay Elemetrics, Inc. 1994: 1–19.

17.

Max

, Onghena

. Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures designs for speech, language, and hearing research. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999; 42: 261–270.

18.

Rothenberg

. A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the Glottal air flow waveform during voicing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 53: 1632–1645.

19.

Rothenberg

. A new method for the measurement of nasalance. Available at http://www.rothenberg.org/Nasalance/Nasalance.htm. Accessed June 28, 2006.

20.

Seaver

E.J.

, Dalston

R.M.

, Leeper

H.A.

, Adams

L.E.

. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 34: 715–721.

21.

Thompson

A.E.

, Hixon

T.J.

. Nasal airflow during normal speech production. Cleft Palate J. 1979; 16: 412–420.

22.

Warren

D.W.

, Dalston

R.M.

, Mayo

. Hypernasality in the presence of “adequate” velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 150–154.

23.

Watterson

, Hinton

, McFarlane

. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996; 33: 67–73.

24.

Zajac

D.J.

. Pressure-flow characteristics of /m/ and /p/ production in speakers without cleft palate: Developmental findings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 468–477.