Chinese Attitudes toward Cleft Lip and Palate: Effects of Personal Contact

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of personal contact on the attitudes of individuals towards persons with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and the possible cultural differences in these attitudes for Chinese respondents living in Hong Kong.

Design:

Chinese parent, teacher, and employer groups were administered a cleft lip and palate attitudinal questionnaire and the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons inventory.

Subjects:

Thirty-nine parents of children with CLP, 27 teachers of children with CLP, and 37 employers with no previous contact with individuals with CLP participated in the study.

Results:

The results showed significant intergroup differences on several items involving beliefs concerning emotional health, social development, and employment-related barriers for individuals with CLP, and whether such individuals should seek nonmedical help to treat speech problems. Employers showed a comparatively less favorable attitude to persons with CLP than the two other groups.

Conclusion:

Parent, teacher, and employer groups in the Chinese community studied showed differences in their attitudes towards individuals with CLP. The findings suggest the need for further community health education to help develop more positive attitudes towards disabled persons in general, as well as programs targeted at reducing negative stereotyping of adults and children with CLP.

Keywords

attitude cleft lip and palate personal contact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman

B.M.

. Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Soc Probl. 1981; 28: 321–337.

Antonak

R.F.

. Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes towards Disabled Persons. J Appl Rehabil Couns. 1982; 13: 22–29.

Antonak

R.F.

, Livneh

. The Measurement of Attitudes Toward People With Disabilities: Methods, Psychometrics and Scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1988.

Bakheit

A.M.O.

, Shanmugalingham

. A study of the attitudes of a rural Indian community toward people with physical disabilities. Clin Rehabil. 1997; 11: 329–334.

Bebout

, Arthur

. Cross-cultural attitudes toward speech disorders. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35: 45–52.

Bebout

, Arthur

. Attitudes toward speech disorders: sampling the views of Cantonese-speaking Americans. J Commun Disord. 1997; 30: 205–229.

Beckwith

J.B.

, Matthews

J.M.

. Measurement of attitudes of trainee professionals to people with disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1995; 39: 255–262.

Berk

N.W.

, Cooper

M.E.

, Liu

Y.E.

, Marazita

M.L.

. Social anxiety in Chinese adults with oral-facial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38: 126–133.

Broder

H.L.

, Richman

L.C.

, Matheson

P.B.

. Learning disability, school achievement, and grade retention among children with cleft palate: a two-centre study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998; 35: 127–131.

10.

Broder

H.L.

, Strauss

R.P.

. Psychological problems and referrals among oral-facial team patients. J Rehabil. 1991; 57: 31–36.

11.

Brophy

J.E.

, Rohrkemper

M.M.

. The influence of problem ownership on teachers’ perceptions of and strategies for coping with problem students. J Educ Psychol. 1981; 73: 295–311.

12.

Chan

, Hua

M.S.

, Ju

J.J.

, Lam

C.S.

. Factorial structures of the Chinese Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons: a cross-cultural validation. Int J Rehabil Res. 1984; 7: 317–337.

13.

Cheng

L-RL

. Asian-American cultural perspectives on birth defects: focus on cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1990; 27: 294–300.

14.

Clifford

. Psychosocial aspects of orofacial anomalies: Speculations in search of data. Rockville: American Speech and Hearing Association; 1973. Report No. 8.

15.

Colman

A.M.

A dictionary of psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.

16.

Cooper

H.M.

. Pygmalion grows up: a model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Rev Educ Res. 1979; 49: 389–410.

17.

Desforges

D.M.

, Lord

C.G.

, Ramsey

S.L.

, Mason

J.A.

, Van Leeuwen

M.D.

, West

S.C.

, Lepper

M.R.

. Effects of structured cooperative contact on changing negative attitudes toward stigmatized social groups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 60: 531–544.

18.

Harper

D.C.

. Children's attitudes to physical differences among youth from Western and non-Western cultures. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 114–119.

19.

Horne

. Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1985.

20.

Hunt

, Burden

, Hepper

, Johnston

. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthodont. 2005; 27: 274–285.

21.

Jordan

J.E.

. Attitude-behavior research on physical-mental-social disability and racial-ethnic differences. Psychol Aspects Disabil. 1971; 18: 5–26.

22.

Kapp-Simon

K.A.

, McGuire

D.E.

. Observed social interaction patterns in adolescents with and without craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34: 380–384.

23.

King

N.M.

, Samman

, So

L.L.Y.

, Cheung

L.K.

, Whitehill

T.L.

, Tideman

. The management of children born with cleft lip and palate. Hong Kong Med J. 1996; 2: 153–159.

24.

Krueckeberg

S.M.

, Kapp-Simon

K.A.

. Effect of parental factors on social skills of preschool children with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 490–496.

25.

Lansdown

, Lloyd

, Hunter

. Facial deformity in childhood: severity and psychological adjustment. Child Health Dev. 1991; 17: 165–171.

26.

Lee

M.S.

. A socio-cultural framework for the assessment of Chinese children with special needs. Top Lang Disord. 1989; 9: 38–44.

27.

Lefebvre

A.M.

, Arndt

E.M.

. Working with facially disfigured children—a challenge in prevention. Can J Psychiatry. 1988; 33: 453–458.

28.

Maras

, Brown

. Effects of different forms of school contact on children's attitudes toward disabled and non-disabled peers. Br J Educ Psych. 2000; 70: 337–351.

29.

Mori

A.A.

. Families of Children With Special Needs: Early Intervention Techniques for the Practitioner. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems; 1983.

30.

Murray

J.C.

. Face facts: genes, environment, and clefts. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 57: 227–232.

31.

Nash

. Living With Disfigurement: Psychosocial Implications of Being Born With Cleft Lip and Palate. Brookfield, VT: Avebury; 1995.

32.

Noar

J.H.

. Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 279–284.

33.

O'Donnell

. Use of the SADP for measurement of attitude of Chinese dental students and dental surgery assistants toward disabled persons. Spec Care Dentist. 1993; 13: 81–85.

34.

O'Donnell

, McPherson

. Student speech pathologist attitudes to disabled people: is there any need for change? Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear. 2002; 7: 111–121.

35.

Olson

J.M.

, Zanna

M.P.

. Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol. 1993; 44: 117–154.

36.

Patel

, Ross

. Reflections on the cleft experience by South African adults: use of qualitative methodology. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003; 40: 471–480.

37.

Richman

L.C.

. The effects of facial disfigurement on teachers’ perception of ability in cleft lip and palate children. Cleft Palate J. 1978; 15: 155–160.

38.

Richman

L.C.

. Facial and speech relationships to behavior of children with clefts across three age levels. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34: 390–395.

39.

Richman

L.C.

, Eliason

. Psychological characteristics of cleft lip and palate children: intellectual, achievement, behavioral and personality variables. Cleft Palate J. 1982; 19: 249–258.

40.

Richman

L.C.

, Eliason

. Type of reading disability related to cleft type and neuropsychological patterns. Cleft Palate J. 1984; 21: 1–6.

41.

Scheuerle

, Guilford

, Garcia

. Employee bias associated with cleft lip/palate. J Appl Rehabil Counsel. 1982; 13: 6–8, 45.

42.

Shaughnessy

J.J.

, Zechmeister

E.B.

. Research Methods in Psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.

43.

Tang

. Change in attitude helps disabled workers. Hong Kong Standard. July 7, 1995; 16.

44.

Trade and Industry Department, Hong Kong. SMEs in HK. Available at: http://www.sme.gcn.gov.hk/smeop/english/smehk.cfm. Accessed May 4, 2006.

45.

Tung

C.H.

. The 2000 Policy Address: Serving the Community, Sharing Common Goals. Hong Kong: Printing Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government; 2000.

46.

Van Demark

D.R.

, Van Demark

A.A.

. Speech and socio-vocational aspects of individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1970; 7: 284–299.

47.

White

M.J.

, Olson

R.S.

. Attitudes toward people with disabilities: a comparison of rehabilitation nurses, occupational therapists, and physical therapists. Rehabil Nurs. 1998; 23: 126–131.

48.

Wilson

T.D.

, Kraft

, Dunn

D.S.

. The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes: the moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1989; 25: 379–400.

49.

Yuker

H.E.

, Block

J.R.

. Research With the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scales. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University; 1986.

50.

Yuker

H.E.

, Block

J.R.

, Young

J.H.

. The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, New York: Human Resources Center; 1966.