Maxillary Growth Controversies after Two-Stage Palatal Repair with Delayed Hard Palate Closure in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Perspectives from Literature and Personal Experience

Abstract

Objective:

To analyze published papers dealing with delayed hard palate repair within a two-stage palatal surgery protocol in treatment of cleft lip and palate. Timing of the procedures, methods used, as well as growth results were considered.

Method:

By utilizing this information in relation to knowledge about normal maxillary development, efforts were made to explain differences in growth outcome between different investigations. Particularly, follow-up reports of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with records up to at least 10 years of age were studied.

Results:

Most papers reported an excellent or very good maxillary growth outcome after their delayed hard palate closure protocols. Where unsatisfactory results were published, reasonable explanations were found accounting for why the method had failed the expectation of good maxillary growth.

Conclusion:

Based on the published reports and the experience from a cleft team where the studied protocol has been practiced since 1975, recommendation for method as well as timing for the two-stage protocol is laid out in some detail.

Keywords

cleft lip and palate delayed hard palate closure dental arch development growth surgery two-stage palatal protocol

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bardach

Morris

H.L.

Olin

W.H.

Late results of primary veloplasty: the Marburg project.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 73: 207–215.

Blocksma

Leuz

C.A.

Mellerstig

K.E.

A conservative program for managing cleft palates without the use of mucoperiosteal flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55: 160–169.

Brattström

Mölsted

Prahl-Andersen

Semb

Shaw

W.C.

The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 69–77.

Chait

Gavron

Graham

Noik

De Aguiar

Modifying the two-stage cleft palate surgical correction.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39: 226–232.

Cosman

Falk

A.S.

Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report.

Cleft Palate J. 1980; 17: 27–33.

Dingman

R.O.

Argenta

L.C.

The correction of cleft palate with primary veloplasty and delayed repair of the palate.

Clin Plast Surg. 1985; 12: 677–684.

Dingman

R.O.

Grabb

W.C.

A rational program for surgical management of bilateral cleft lip and cleft palate.

Plast Reconst Surg. 1971; 47: 239–242.

Friede

Growth sites and growth mechanisms at risk in cleft lip and palate.

Acta Odontol Scand. 1998; 56: 346–351.

Friede

Enemark

Long-term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38: 323–329.

10.

Friede

Johanson

A follow-up study of cleft children treated with vomer flap as part of a three-stage soft tissue surgical procedure.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 11: 45–57.

11.

Friede

Lilja

Letter to the editor.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 453–454.

12.

Friede

Lilja

Johanson

Cleft lip and palate treatment with delayed closure of the hard palate. A preliminary report.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980; 14: 49–53.

13.

Friede

Lohmander

Hagberg

Elander

Lilja

Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in UCLP patients treated with different delays of hard palate closure after early velar repair.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 2006; 40: 261–266.

14.

Friede

Möller

Lilja

Lauritzen

Johanson

Facial morphology and occlusion at the stage of early mixed dentition in cleft lip and palate patients treated with delayed closure of the hard palate.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 21: 65–71.

15.

Friede

Priede

Möller

Maulina

Lilja

Barkane

Comparisons of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different regimes for two-stage palatal repair.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1999; 33: 73–81.

16.

Gaggl

Feichtinger

Schultes

Santler

Pichlmaier

Mossböck

Kärcher

Cephalometric and occlusal outcome in adults with unilateral cleft lip, palate, and alveolus after two different surgical techniques.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003; 40: 249–255.

17.

Gillies

H.D.

Fry

W.K.

A new principle in the surgical treatment of “congenital cleft palate”, and its mechanical counterpart.

Br Med J. 1921; 1: 335–338.

18.

Gnoinski

Orofacial development up to age 15 in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate cases treated according to the Zürich concept. In: Pfeifer

, ed. Craniofacial Abnormalities and Clefts of the Lip, Alveolus and Palate (4th Hamburg International Symposium). Stuttgart: Thieme; 1991: 270–272.

19.

Gnoinski

W.M.

Haubensak

R.R.

Facial patterns and long-term growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. In: Lee

S.T.

, ed. Transactions 8th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Singapore: Stamford; 1997: 764–768.

20.

Hotz

22 years of experience in cleft palate management, and its consequences for treatment planning. In: Kehrer

Slongo

Graf

Bettex

, eds. Long Term Treatment in Cleft Lip and Palate. Bern: Hans Huber; 1981: 208–211.

21.

Hotz

Gnoinski

Comprehensive care of cleft lip and palate children at Zürich University: a preliminary report.

Am J Orthod. 1976; 70: 481–504.

22.

Hotz

Gnoinski

Perko

Nussbaumer

Hof

Haubensak

The Zürich approach, 1964 to 1984. In: Hotz

Gnoinski

Perko

Nussbaumer

Hof

Haubensak

, eds. Early Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate. Toronto: Hans Huber; 1986: 42–48.

23.

Johanson

Lilja

Friede

Möller

Lauritzen

The evolution of the therapeutic approach to cleft lip and palate in Gothenburg. In: Hotz

Gnoinski

Perko

Nussbaumer

Hof

Haubensak

, eds. Early Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate. Toronto: Hans Huber; 1986: 85–89.

24.

Kriens

O.B.

An anatomical approach to veloplasty.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 43: 29–41.

25.

Lilja

Friede

Johanson

Changing philosophy of surgery of the cleft lip and palate in Göteborg, Sweden. In: Berkowitz

, ed. Cleft Lip and Palate. Perspectives on Management. Vol. II. San Diego: Singular Publishing; 1996: 155–170.

26.

Lilja

Mars

Elander

Enocson

Hagberg

Worrell

Batra

Friede

Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish UCLP subjects: 20 year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure.

Cleft Palate Craniofacial J. 2006; 43: 606–611.

27.

Lilja

Möller

Friede

Lauritzen

Petterson

L-E

Johanson

Bone grafting at the stage of mixed dentition in cleft lip and palate patients.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 21: 73–79.

28.

Lohmander-Agerskov

Speech outcome after cleft palate surgery with the Göteborg regimen including delayed hard palate closure.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998; 32: 63–80.

29.

Lohmander

Lillvik

Friede

The impact of early infant jaw-orthopedics on early speech production in toddlers with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Clin Linguist Phon. 2004; 18: 259–284.

30.

Malek

Martinez

Mousset

M.R.

Trichet

Multidisciplinary management of cleft lip and palate in Paris, France. In: Bardach

Morris

H.L.

, eds. Multidisciplinary Approach of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 1–10.

31.

Markus

A.F.

Smith

W.P.

Delaire

Primary closure of cleft palate: a functional approach.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 31: 71–77.

32.

Mölsted

Brattström

Prahl-Andersen

Shaw

W.C.

Semb

The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 78–82.

33.

Noverraz

A.E.M.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Mars

van't Hof

M.A.

Timing of hard palate closure and dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a mixed-longitudinal study.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 391–396.

34.

Owman-Moll

Katsaros

Friede

Development of the residual cleft in the hard palate after velar repair in a 2-stage palatal repair regimen.

J Orofac Orthop. 1998; 59: 286–300.

35.

Perko

Two-stage closure of cleft palate.

J Maxillofac Surg. 1979; 7: 76–80.

36.

Prydsö

Holm

P.C.A.

Dahl

Fogh-Andersen

Bone formation in palatal clefts subsequent to palato-vomer plasty. Influence on transverse maxillary growth.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 8: 73–78.

37.

Rautio

Semb

Lohmander

International randomized control trial of primary surgery. In: The 9th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies. Göteborg, Sweden, 2001; Abstract 758.

38.

Robertson

N.R.E.

Jolleys

The timing of hard palate repair.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 8: 49–51.

39.

Robertson

N.R.E.

Jolleys

A further look at the effects of delaying repair of the hard palate. In: Huddart

A.G.

Ferguson

M.J.W.

, eds. Cleft Lip and Palate. Vol. 2. Long-term Results and Future Prospects. Manchester: University Press; 1990: 176–182.

40.

Rohrich

R.J.

Love

E.J.

Byrd

H.S.

Johns

D.F.

Optimal timing of cleft palate closure.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 413–421.

41.

Rohrich

R.J.

Rowsell

A.R.

Johns

D.F.

Drury

M.A.

Greig

Watson

D.J.

Godfrey

A.M.

Poole

M.D.

Timing of hard palate closure: a critical long-term analysis.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 236–246.

42.

Ross

R.B.

Treatment variables affecting facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 5: timing of palatal repair.

Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 54–63.

43.

Ross

R.B.

Growth of facial skeleton following the Malek repair for unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995; 32: 194–198.

44.

Schweckendiek

Zur zweiphasigen Gaumenspaltenoperation bei primärem Velumverschluss.

Fortschr Kiefer und Gesichtschir. 1955; 1: 73–76.

45.

Schweckendiek

Primary veloplasty: long-term results without maxillary deformity. A twenty-five year report.

Cleft Palate J. 1978; 15: 268–274.

46.

Shaw

W.C.

Asher-McDade

Brattström

Dahl

McWilliam

Mölsted

Plint

D.A.

Prahl-Andersen

Semb

The

R.P.S.

A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Part 1. Principles and study design.

Cleft Palate J. 1992; 29: 393–397.

47.

Shaw

Semb

Nelson

Brattström

Mölsted

Prahl-Andersen

The Eurocleft Project 1996–2000. Standards of Care for Cleft Lip and Palate in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000: 269.

48.

Slaughter

W.B.

Pruzansky

The rationale for velar closure as a primary procedure in the repair of cleft palate defects.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1954; 13: 341–357.

49.

Swennen

Berten

J.L.

Schliephake

Treutlein

Dempf

Malevez

De Mey

Midfacial morphology in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by different surgical protocols.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 31: 13–22.

50.

Tanino

Akamatsu

Nishimura

Miyasaka

Osada

The influence of different types of hard palate closure in two-stage palatoplasty on maxillary growth: cephalometric analyses and long-term follow-up.

Ann Plast Surg. 1997b; 39: 245–253.

51.

Tanino

Akamatsu

Osada

The influence of different types of hard palate closure in two-stage palatoplasty upon palatal growth: dental cast analyses.

Keio J Med. 1997a; 46: 27–36.

52.

Van Demark

D.R.

Gnoinski

Hotz

M.M.

Perko

Nussbaumer

Speech results of the Zürich approach in the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83: 605–613.

53.

Walter

J.D.

Hale

A study of the long term results achieved by the Gillies Fry procedure.

Br J Plast Surg. 1987; 40: 384–390.

54.

Widmaier

A surgery procedure for the closure of palatal clefts. In: Schu-chardt

, ed. Treatment of Patients With Clefts of Lip, Alveolus and Palate (2nd Hamburg International Symposium, 1964). Stuttgart: Thieme; 1966: 87–89.

55.

Witzel

M.A.

Salyer

K.E.

Ross

R.B.

Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revisited.

Cleft Palate J. 1984; 21: 263–269.