Speech Intelligibility of Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate after Placement of Speech Prosthesis

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the speech intelligibility of patients with clefts before and after placement of a speech prosthesis.

Design:

Cross-sectional.

Setting:

Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/USP), Bauru, Brazil.

Patients:

Twenty-seven patients with unoperated cleft palate or operated cleft palate presenting with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary palatoplasty, treated with speech prosthesis, aged 8 to 63 years.

Interventions:

Patients were fitted with palatopharyngeal obturators or pharyngeal bulbs, suitable to their dental needs. Five speech-language pathologists blindly evaluated speech samples of the patients with and without the prosthesis.

Main Outcome Measures:

Classification of speech samples according to a scoring system developed for speech intelligibility problems: 1 (normal), 2 (mild), 3 (mild to moderate), 4 (moderate), 5 (moderate to severe), and 6 (severe). Results were evaluated by the calculation of means of all judges for each patient in both situations.

Results:

The judges presented significant agreement (W = .789, p < .01). Speech intelligibility was significantly better after placement of the prosthesis for both unoperated patients (Z = 1.93, p = .02) and operated patients with VPI after primary palatoplasty (Z = 1.78, p = .03).

Conclusions:

Speech intelligibility may be improved by rehabilitation of patients with cleft palate using a speech prosthesis. Speech therapy is needed to eliminate any compensatory articulation productions developed prior to prosthetic management.

Keywords

palatopharyngeal obturator pharyngeal bulb speech speech prosthesis velopharyngeal insufficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adisman

I.K.

Cleft palate prosthetics. In: Grabb

W.C.

Rosenstein

S.W.

Bzoch

K.R.

, eds. Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little, Brown; 1971: 617–642.

Alley

N.R.A.

The use of speech aid prosthesis as a diagnostic tool.

Cleft Palate J. 1965; 2: 291–292.

Aram

Subtelny

J.D.

Velopharyngeal function and cleft palate prosthesis.

J Prosthet Dent. 1959; 9: 149–158.

Arcuri

M.R.

LaVelle

W.E.

Higuchi

K.W.

Svec

B.R.

Implant-supported prosthesis for treatment of adults with cleft palate.

J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71: 375–378.

Arndt

W.B.

Jr Shelton

R.L.

Jr Bradford

L.J.

Articulation, voice and obturation in persons with acquired and congenital palate defects.

Cleft Palate J. 1965; 2: 377–383.

Brandt

S.D.

Morris

H.L.

The linearity of the relationship between articulation errors and velopharyngeal incompetence.

Cleft Palate J. 1965; 2: 176–183.

Byrne

M.C.

Shelton

R.L.

Jr Diedrich

W.M.

Articulatory skill, physical management, and classification of children with cleft palate.

J Speech Hear Disord. 1961; 26: 326–333.

Bzoch

K.R.

Introduction to the study of communicative disorders in cleft palate and related craniofacial anomalies. In: Bzoch

K.R.

, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2004: 3–65.

Curtis

T.A.

Chierici

Prosthetics as a diagnostic aid in pharyngeal flap surgery.

Cleft Palate J. 1964; 1: 95–98.

10.

Falter

J.W.

Shelton

R.L.

Bulb fitting and placement in prosthetic treatment of cleft palate.

Cleft Palate J. 1964; 1: 441–447.

11.

Fletcher

S.G.

Diagnosing Speech Disorders From Cleft Palate. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1978.

12.

Hardin-Jones

M.A.

Brown

C.K.

Van Demark

D.R.

Morris

H.L.

Long-term speech results of cleft palate patients with primary palatoplasty.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 55–63.

13.

Harkins

C.S.

Role of the prosthodontist in the rehabilitation of cleft palate patients.

J Am Dent Assoc. 1951; 43: 29–33.

14.

Harrison

J.W.

Dental implants to rehabilitate a patient with an unrepaired complete cleft of the hard and soft palate: a clinical report.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 485–488.

15.

Hutters

Henningsson

Speech outcome following treatment in cross-linguistic cleft palate studies: methodological implications.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004; 41: 544–549.

16.

Jian

Ningyi

Guilan

Application of obturator to treat velopharyngeal incompetence.

Chin Med J. 2002; 115: 842–845.

17.

Keuning

K.H.D.

Wieneke

G.H.

Dejonckere

P.H.

The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 328–333.

18.

Kuehn

D.P.

Moller

K.T.

Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 1–35.

19.

Kummer

A.W.

Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies: Effects on Speech and Resonance. San Diego, CA: Singular; 2001: 145–176.

20.

Lohmander

Olsson

Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004; 41: 64–70.

21.

Mattos

C.M.A.

A prótese de fala como forma de reabilitação dos pacientes portadores de fissura lábio-palatal [monograph]. São Paulo, Brazil: Hospital de Pesquisa e Reabilitação de Lesões Lábio-Palatais, Universidade de São Paulo; 1990.

22.

Mazaheri

Indications and contraindications for prosthetic speech appliances in cleft palate.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962; 30: 663–669.

23.

Mazaheri

Prosthodontic care. In: Cooper

H.K.

Harding

R.L.

Krogman

W.M.

Mazaheri

Millard

R.T.

, eds. Cleft Palate and Cleft Lip: A Team Approach to Clinical Management and Rehabilitation of the Patient. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1979: 285–314.

24.

Mazaheri

E.H.

Correction of palatal defects: a prosthodontist's viewpoint.

J Oral Surg. 1973; 31: 913–917.

25.

McGrath

C.O.

Anderson

M.W.

Prosthetic treatment of velopharyngeal incompetence. In: Bardach

Morris

H.L.

, eds. Multidisciplinary Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990.

26.

McWilliams

B.J.

Speech and language problems in children with cleft palate.

J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1966; 21: 1005–1015.

27.

McWilliams

B.J.

Morris

H.L.

Shelton

R.L.

Cleft Palate Speech. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1990.

28.

Olin

W.H.

Cleft Lip and Palate Rehabilitation. Springfield, MA: Charles C Thomas; 1960.

29.

Park

Saso

Ito

Tokioka

Kato

Gitano

The outcome of long-term follow-up after palatoplasty.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 12–17.

30.

Pegoraro-Krook

M.I.

Avaliação da fala de pacientes que apresentam inadequação velofaríngea e que utilizam prótese de palato. São Paulo, Brazil: São Paulo Medical School; 1995. Thesis.

31.

Peterson-Falzone

S.J.

Hardin-Jones

M.A.

Karnell

M.P.

Cleft Palate Speech. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2001.

32.

Pinborough-Zimmerman

Canady

Yamashiro

D.K.

Morales

Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998; 35: 81–87.

33.

Pinto

J.H.N.

Pegoraro-Krook

M.I.

Evaluation of palatal prosthesis for the treatment of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

J Appl Oral Sci. 2003; 11: 192–197.

34.

Reisberg

D.J.

Dental and prosthodontic care for patients with cleft or craniofacial conditions. State of the Art.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 534–537.

35.

Rosen

M.S.

Bzoch

K.R.

The prosthetic speech appliance in rehabilitation of patients with cleft palate.

J Am Dent Assoc. 1958; 57: 203–210.

36.

Rosen

M.S.

Bzoch

K.R.

The use of prosthetic speech appliances in cleft palate management. In: Bzoch

K.R.

, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2004: 237–257.

37.

Shames

G.H.

Fisher

The relationship of types of articulation error to intelligibility of speech.

Speech Pathol Ther. 1960; 1: 30–34.

38.

Shelton

R.L.

Brooks

A.R.

Youngstrom

K.A.

Articulation and patterns of palatal pharyngeal closure.

J Speech Disord. 1964; 29: 390–408.

39.

Shelton

R.L.

Lindquist

A.F.

Knox

A.W.

Wright

V.L.

Arndt

W.B.

Elbert

Youngstrom

K.A.

The relationship between pharyngeal wall movements and exchangeable speech appliance sections.

Cleft Palate J. 1971; 8: 145–158.

40.

Spriestersbach

Assessing nasal quality in cleft palate speech of children.

J Speech Disord. 1955; 20: 266–270.

41.

Subtelny

J.D.

Sakuda

Subtelny

J.D.

Prosthetic treatment for palatopharyngeal incompetence: research and clinical implications.

Cleft Palate J. 1966; 3: 130–158.

42.

Tachimura

T.T.

Nohara

K.N.

Fujita

Wada

Change in levator veli palatine muscle activity for patients with cleft palate in association with placement of a speech-aid prosthesis.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39: 503–508.

43.

Van Demark

D.R.

Hardin

M.A.

Longitudinal evaluation of articulation and velopharyngeal competence of patients with pharyngeal flaps.

Cleft Palate J. 1985; 22: 163–172.

44.

Van Hattum

R.J.

Articulation and nasality in cleft palate speakers.

J Speech Hear Res. 1959; 2: 113–125.

45.

Whitehill

Assessing intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39: 50–58.

46.

Wood

W.M.

Watertown

N.Y.

Rehabilitation of the cleft palate patient.

Am J Orthod. 1950; 36: 348–350.