To achieve sufficient velopharyngeal function and maxillary growth for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), the authors have designed a new treatment protocol for palate closure involving early two-stage palatoplasty with modified Furlow veloplasty. Details of the surgical protocol and the outcomes of the dental occlusion of patients at 4 years of age are presented.
Design and Setting
This was an institutional retrospective study.
Patients
Seventy-two UCLP patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment protocols: patients treated using the early two-stage palatoplasty protocol (ETS group; n = 30) and patients treated using Wardill-Kilner push-back palatoplasty performed at 1 year of age (PB group; n = 42).
Interventions
The features of the ETS protocol are as follows: The soft palate is repaired at 12 months of age using a modified Furlow technique. The residual cleft in the hard palate is closed at 18 months of age. Lip repair is carried out at 3 months of age with a modified Millard technique for all subjects.
Results
The ETS group showed a significantly better occlusal condition than the PB group. The incidence of normal occlusion at the noncleft side central incisor was 7.1% in the PB group; whereas, it was 66.7% in the ETS group.
Conclusion
The results indicate that the early two-stage protocol is advantageous for UCLP children in attaining better dental occlusion at 4 years of age.
BardachJ., MorrisH.L., OlinW.H.Late results of primary veloplasty: the Marburg project. Plast Reconstr Surg.1984; 73: 207–215.
2.
ChoB.C., KimJ.Y., YangJ.D., LeeD.G., ChungH.Y., ParkJ.W.Influence of the Furlow palatoplasty for patients with submucous cleft palate on facial growth. J Craniofac Surg.2004; 15: 547–554.
3.
CosmanB., FalkA.S.Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report. Cleft Palate J.1980; 17: 27–33.
4.
DiahE., LoL.J., HuangC.S., SudjatmikoG., SusanI., ChenY.R.Maxillary growth of adult patients with unoperated cleft: answers to the debates. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.2007; 60: 407–413.
5.
FurlowLTJr.. Cleft-Palate repair by modified double-opposing Z-plasty: the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experience. Plast Reconstr Surg.1999; 104: 2011–2014.
FriedeH., EnemarkH.Long-term evidence for favorable midfacial growth after delayed hard palate repair in UCLP patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 323–329.
8.
FriedeH.Growth sites and growth mechanisms at risk in cleft lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand.1998; 56: 346–351.
9.
FriedeH., PerssonE.C., LiljaJ., ElanderA., Lohmander-AgerskovA., SöderpalmE.Maxillary dental arch and occlusion in patients with repaired clefts of the secondary palate. Influence of push back palatal surgery. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1993; 27: 297–305.
10.
GoodP.M., MullikenJ.B., PadwaB.L.Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy after repaired cleft lip and palate or cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 396–401.
11.
GreenJ.R., MooreC.A., HigashikawaM., SteeveR.W.The physiologic development of speech motor control: lip and jaw coordination. J Speech Lang Hear Res.2003; 46: 1016–1019.
HotzM.M., GnoinskiW.M.Effects of early maxillary orthopaedics in coordination with delayed surgery for cleft lip and palate. J Maxillofac Surg.1979; 7: 201–210.
14.
HuddartA.G., BodenhamR.S.The evaluation of arch form and occlusion in unilateral cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate J.1972; 9: 194–209.
15.
LiaoY.F., MarsM.Hard palate repair timing and facial growth in cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 563–570.
16.
LiaoY.F., ColeT.J., MarsM.Hard palate repair timing and facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a longitudinal study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 547–556.
17.
LohmanderA., PerssonC.A longitudinal study of speech production in Swedish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate and two-stage palatal repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2008; 45: 32–41.
18.
Lohmander-AgerskovA.Speech outcome after cleft palate surgery with the Göteborg regimen including delayed hard palate closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.1998; 32: 63–80.
19.
Lohmander-AgerskovA., FriedeH., SöderpalmE., LiljaJ.Residual clefts in the hard palate: correlation between cleft size and speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 122–128.
20.
MommaertsM.Y., KablanF., ShethS., LasterZ.Early maxillary growth in complete cleft lip, alveolus and palate patients following Widmaier-Perko's, or a modified Furlow's technique of soft palate repair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg.2003; 31: 209–214.
21.
MurisonM.S., PigottR.W.Medial Langenbeck: experience of a modified Von Langenbeck repair of the cleft palate. A preliminary report. Br J Plastic Surg.1992; 45: 454–459.
22.
NishioJ., AdachiT., HiranoY., SakoM.A new designed two-stage palatoplasty using Furlow's veloplasty. In: JanLilja, ed. Transactions of the 9th International Conference of Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Organising Committee for the 9th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, Goteborg, Sweden, 2001: 173–276.
23.
NolletP.J., KatsarosC., van 't HofM.A., SembG., ShawW.C., Kuijpers-JagtmanA.M.Treatment outcome after two-stage palatal closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 512–516.
24.
NoordhoffM.S., KuoJ., WangF., HuangH., WitzelM.A.Development of articulation before delayed hard-palate closure in children with cleft palate: a cross-sectional study. Plast Reconstr Surg.1987; 80: 518–524.
RohrichR.J., RowsellA.R., JohnsD.F., DruryM.A., GriegG., WatsonD.J., GodfreyA.M., PooleM.D.Timing of hard palatal closure: a critical long-term analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg.1996; 98: 236–246.
28.
RohrichR.J., ByrdH.S.Optimal timing of cleft palate closure. Speech, facial growth, and hearing considerations. Clin Plast Surg.1990; 17: 27–36.
29.
RossR.B.Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J.1987; 24: 5–77.
30.
RuarkJ.L., MooreC.A.Coordination of lip muscle activity by 2-year-old children during speech and nonspeech tasks. J Speech Lang Hear Res.1997; 40: 1373–1385.
31.
SchweckendiekW.Primary veloplasty: long-term results without maxillary deformity. A twenty-five year report. Cleft Palate J.1978; 15: 268–274.
32.
SembG., ShawW.C.Facial growth after different methods of surgical intervention in patients with cleft lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand.1998; 56: 352–355.
33.
ShetyeP.R., EvansC.A.Midfacial morphology in adult unoperated complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Angle Orthod.2006; 76: 810–816.
34.
SilveraQ.A.E., IshiiK., AraiT., MoritaS., OnoK., IidaA., HanadaK., TakagiR.Long term results of the two-stage palatoplasty/Hotz plate approach for complete bilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate patients. Craniomaxillofac Surg.2003; 31: 215–227.
35.
SteinS., DunscheA., GellrichN.C., HärleF., JonasI.One- or two-stage palate closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: comparing cephalometric and occlusal outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 13–22.
36.
Van LierdeK.M., MonstreyS., BonteK., Van CauwenbergeP., VinckB.The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2004; 68: 865–875.
37.
WitzelM.A., SalyerK.E., RossR.B.Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revisited. Cleft Palate J.1984; 21: 263–269.
