To determine whether raters' first impressions of youth with craniofacial differences are modifiable.
Design
Observational study of the association between first impressions and social skills as related to youth aged 11 to 18 years with craniofacial differences.
Setting
University research offices and clinics.
Participants
Youth aged 11 to 18 years with (n = 29) and without (n = 31) craniofacial differences; adults (n = 40), dental/medical students (n = 46), and education students (n = 29), all without craniofacial differences. Participants were recruited from medical clinics and through community advertising at all three study sites.
Outcome Measures
The First Impressions Rating Scale.
Results
After viewing 1-minute portrayals of positive social skills by actors with craniofacial differences, raters' perceptions moved significantly in the positive direction for all 26 attributes on the First Impressions Rating Scale; whereas, after viewing negative social skills, ratings moved significantly in the negative direction for 25 of 26 First Impressions Rating Scale attributes.
Conclusions
It appears that first impressions others have of youth with craniofacial differences are significantly affected by how these youth present themselves in social situations, suggesting that positive social skills may help reduce the amount of stigma that youth with craniofacial differences encounter.
AblonJ.Stigmatized health conditions. Soc Sci Med.1981; 15: 5–8.
2.
BallengerJ.C., DavidsonJ.R.T., LecrubierY., NuttD.J., BobesJ., BeidelD.C., OnoY., WesternbergH.G.M.Consensus statement on social anxiety disorder from the International Consensus Group on Depression and Anxiety. J Clin Psych.1998; 59: 54–60.
3.
BennettM.E., StantonM.Psychotherapy for persons with craniofacial deformities: can we treat without theory?Cleft Palate J.1993; 30: 406–410.
4.
BersheidE.Overview of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In: LuckerG.W., RibbensK.A., McNamaraJ.A., eds. Psychological Aspects of Facial Form. Craniofacial Growth Series Monograph, No. 11.Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development;1980: 1–23.
5.
BlakeneyP., ThomasC., HolzerC., RoseM., BernigerF., MeyerW.J.Efficacy of a short-term, intensive social skills training program for burned adolescents. Burn Care Rehabil.2005; 26: 546–555.
6.
ColeJ.About Face.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press;1998.
7.
CunninghamS.J.The psychology of facial appearance. Dent Update.1999; 26: 438–443.
8.
EaglyA.H., AshmoreR.D., MakhijaniM.G., LongoL.C.What is beautiful is good, but…: a meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychol Bull.1991; 110: 109–128.
9.
EndrigaM.C., Kapp-SimonK.A.Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1999; 36: 3–10.
10.
ErathS.A., FlanaganK.S., BiermanK.L.Social anxiety and peer relations in early adolescence: behavioral and cognitive factors. J Abnorm Child Psychol.2007; 35: 405–416.
11.
GoffmanE.Stigma—Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall;1963: 2–3, 43–51.
12.
GuyW.ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology—Revised.Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs;1976: 218–222. DHEW Publication No. ADM 76–338.
13.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., StevensonM., JohnstonC.Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 598–605.
14.
Kapp-SimonK.A., McGuireD.E.Observed social interaction patterns in adolescents with and without craniofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 380–384.
15.
Kapp-SimonK.A., McGuireD.E., LongB.C., SimonD.J.Addressing quality of life issues in adolescents: Social skills interventions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 45–50.
16.
Kapp-SimonK.A., SimonD.J., KristovichS.Self-perception, social skills, adjustment, and inhibition in young adolescents with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1992; 29: 352–356.
17.
KishV., LansdownR.Meeting the psychosocial impact of facial disfigurement: developing a clinical service for children and families. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry.2000; 5: 497–512.
18.
McFallR.M.A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills. Behav Assess.1982; 4: 1–33.
19.
NashP.Living With Disfigurement: The Psychosocial Implications of Being Born With a Cleft Lip and Palate.Avebury: Aldershot;1995.
20.
ParkerJ.G., RubinK.H., ErathS.A., WojslawowiczJ.C., BuskirkA.A.Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: a developmental psychopathology perspective. In: CicchettiD., CohenD.J., eds. Developmental Psychopathology: Vol. 1: Theory and Methods.2nd ed.New York: Wiley;2006: 96–161.
PopeA.W., WardJ.Factors associated with peer social competence in preadolescents with craniofacial anomalies. J Pediatr Psychol.1997a; 22: 455–469.
23.
PopeA.W., WardJ.Self-perceived facial appearance and psychosocial adjustment in preadolescents with craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997b; 34: 396–401.
24.
RichmanL.C.Facial and speech relationships to behavior of children with clefts across three age levels. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1997; 34: 390–395.
25.
RobinsonE., RumseyN., PartridgeJ.An evaluation of the impact of social interaction skills training for facial disfigured people. Br J Plast Surg.1996; 1: 281–289.
26.
RumseyN., BullR., GahaganD.A preliminary study of the effects of social skills training for improving the quality of social interaction for the facially disfigured. Soc Behav.1986; 1: 143–145.
27.
RumseyN., HarcourtD.Visible difference amongst children and adolescents: issues and interventions. Dev Neurorehab.2007; 10: 113–123.
28.
ScamblerG., HopkinsA.Being epileptic: coming to terms with stigma. Soc Health Illness.1986; 8: 26–43.
29.
RutterM.Transitions and turning points in developmental psychology: as applied to the age span between childhood and mid-adulthood. Int J Behav Dev.1996; 19: 603–626.
30.
SternD.N.The Interpersonal World of the Infant.New York: Basic Books;1985.
31.
UsitaloA.M.Perceptions of stigmatization, attributional style, and adjustment in adolescents with craniofacial conditions. Dissert Abstr Int.2002; 63: 3028.
32.
VaseyM.W., DaleidenE.L.Information-processing pathways to cognitive interference in childhood. In: SarasonI.G., PierceG., SarasonB., eds. Cognitive Interference: Theory, Methods, and Findings.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum;1996: 117–138.
