A Comparative Study on the Measurements of Palatal Shelf Area and Gradient for Adult Patients with Unoperated Cleft Palate

Abstract

Objective

To determine the maxillary growth potential of cleft palate patients compared with the normal population.

Methods

By using a three-dimensional computed tomography scanning and imaging system, the gradient and surface area of the palatal shelves were measured and analyzed statistically among 30 adults with normal occlusion, 30 adult patients with operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate, and 30 adults with unoperated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

Results

In comparison with the control group, for the unoperated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate subjects, the gradient of the palatal shelves at both the cleft and noncleft sides was larger, meaning that the palatal shelves were rotated cranially and were more vertically positioned. The palatal surface area was significantly smaller in the unoperated and operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate groups than in the noncleft control group; although, there was no significant difference between the unoperated and operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate groups.

Conclusions

There is an intrinsic tissue deficiency in the palate/maxilla of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients.

Keywords

palatal shelf area palatal shelf gradient unoperated UCLP

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz

A multicenter retrospective 3D study of serial complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate casts to evaluate treatment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 413–424.

Darvann

T.A.

Hermann

N.V.

Ersbøll

B.K.

Palatal surface area of maxillary plaster casts—a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007; 44: 381–390.

Diah

L.J.

Huang

C.S.

Maxillary growth of adult patients with unoperated cleft: answers to the debates. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60: 407–413.

Huddart

A.G.

Crabb

J.J.

Newton

A rapid method of measuring the palatal surface area of cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate J. 1978; 15: 44–48.

Kerr

W.J.

Kelly

Geddes

D.A.

The areas of various surfaces in the human mouth from nine years to adulthood. J Dent Res. 1991; 70: 1528–1530.

L.J.

Wong

F.H.

Chen

Y.R.

Palatal surface area measurement: comparisons among different cleft types. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 50: 18–23.

Mars

Houston

W.J.

A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 year of age. Cleft Palate J. 1990; 27: 7–10.

Mishima

Mori

Sugahara

Sakuda

Comparison between the palatal configurations in complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate infants under 18 months of age. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38: 49–54.

Yoshida

Nakamura

Michi

Wang

G.M.

Liu

Qiu

W.L.

Cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial morphology in unoperated cleft palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 419–424.

10.

Van Limborg

Some aspects of the development of the cleft affected face. In: Hotz

Gnoinski

, eds. Early Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate. Berne-Stuttgart: Hans Huber; 1964: 25–29.

11.

Veau

Division Palatine. Paris: Masson et Cie; 1931.