To obtain descriptions of the experience of growing up with a cleft-related speech impairment and how it was dealt with.
Design
Semistructured interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a qualitative approach inspired by grounded theory methodology.
Setting
Interviews took place at participants' homes or workplaces or at the university.
Participants
Thirteen young adults (25 to 34 years of age) born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip.
Results
The analysis resulted in the core category Taking charge of communication, which comprised three main categories: Forming an idea of one's speech, Learning about one's communication, and Taking responsibility for communication. The first main category was made up of three subcategories and the other two had two. The categories emerged as parallel processes in the understanding and active handling of communicative interaction.
Conclusions
The participants described the processes that had enabled them to take charge of their communication. Seeing things from the listener's perspective and being open about the cleft and the speech disorder emerged as important parts of taking active responsibility for communication, as well as accepting their present speech and communication. Communicative participation should be assessed more thoroughly to understand the individual needs of people born with a cleft who have a speech impairment into adolescence.
AllisonS., RoegerL., Reinfeld-KirkmanN.Does school bullying affect adult health? Population survey of health-related quality of life and past victimization.Aust NZJ Psychiatry.2009; 43: 1163–1170.
2.
BaylorC.R., YorkstonK.M., EadieT.L.The consequences of spasmodic dysphonia on communication-related quality of life: a qualitative study of the insider's experiences.J Commun Disord.2005; 38: 395–419.
3.
BeckerM., SvenssonH., SarnasK.V., JacobssonS.Von Langenbeck or Wardill procedures for primary palatal repair in patients with isolated cleft palate—speech results.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2000; 34: 27–32.
4.
BilboulM.J., PopeA.W., SnyderH.T.Adolescents with craniofacial anomalies: psychosocial adjustment as a function of self-concept.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 392–400.
5.
Billaud FeragenK., BorgeA.I., RumseyN.Social experience in 10-year-old children born with a cleft: exploring psychosocial resilience.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 65–74.
Brunstein KlomekA., MarroccoF., KleinmanM., SchonfeldI.S., GouldM.S.Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2007; 46: 40–49.
8.
CharmazK.Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis.London: SAGE;2006.
9.
ChetpakdeechitW., HallbergU., HagbergC., MohlinB.Social life aspects of young adults with cleft lip and palate: grounded theory approach.Acta Odontol Scand.2009; 67: 122–128.
10.
EadieT.L., YorkstonK.M., KlasnerE.R., DudgeonB.J., DeitzJ.C., BaylorC.R., MillerR.M., AmtmannD.Measuring communicative participation: a review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology.Am J Speech Lang Pathol.2006; 15: 307–320.
11.
GlaserB.G., StraussA.L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.New York: Aldine de Gruyter;1967.
12.
GrunwellP., BrondstedK., HenningssonG., JansoniusK., KarlingJ., MeijerM., OrdingU., WyattR., Vermeij-ZieverinkE., SellD.A six-centre international study of the outcome of treatment in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: the results of a cross-linguistic investigation of cleft palate speech.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2000; 34: 219–229.
13.
HavstamC., LohmanderA., Dahlgren SandbergA., ElanderA.Speech and satisfaction with outcome of treatment in young adults with unilateral or bilateral complete clefts.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2008; 42: 182–189.
14.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., StevensonM., JohnstonC.Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2006; 43: 598–605.
15.
KuehnD.P., MollerK.T.Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2000; 37: 348.
16.
LassN.J., RuscelloD.M., HarkinsK.E., BlankenshipB.L.A comparative study of adolescents' perceptions of normal-speaking and dysarthric children.J Comm Disord.1993; 26: 3–12.
17.
LassN.J., RuscelloD.M., StoutL.L., HoffmanF.M.Peer perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children.Folia Phoniatr Logop.1991; 43: 29–35.
18.
LazarusR.S., FolkmanS.Stress, Appraisal and Coping.New York: Springer;1984.
19.
LohmanderA., FriedeH., ElanderA., PerssonC., LiljaJ.Speech development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different delays in closure of the hard palate after early velar repair: a longitudinal perspective.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.2006; 40: 267–274.
20.
MarcussonA., ÅkerlindI., PaulinG.Quality of life in adults with repaired complete cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 379–385.
21.
Meyer-MarcottyP., Stellzig-EisenhauerA.Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate.J Orofac Orthop.2009; 70: 224–236.
22.
MosseyP.Epidemiology underpinning research in the aetiology of orofacial clefts.Orthod Craniofac Res.2007; 10: 114–120.
23.
NoorS.N., MusaS.Assessment of patients' level of satisfaction with cleft treatment using the Cleft Evaluation Profile.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2007; 44: 292–303.
24.
OliverM.Theories in health care and research: theories of disability in health practice and research.BMJ.1998; 317: 1446–1449.
25.
OlweusD.Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do.Oxford: Blackwell;1993.
26.
OosterkampB.C., DijkstraP.U., RemmelinkH.J., van OortR.P., Goorhuis-BrouwerS.M., SandhamA., de BontL.G.Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007; 36: 890–895.
27.
ParkS., SasoY., ItoO., TokiokaK., TakatoT., KatoK., KitanoI.The outcome of long-term follow-up after palatoplasty.Plast Reconstr Surg.2000; 105: 12–17.
28.
PatelZ., RossE.Reflections on the cleft experience by South African adults: use of qualitative methodology.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2003; 40: 471–480.
29.
RiskiJ.E.Speech assessment of adolescents.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1995; 32: 109–113.
30.
SembG., BrattstromV., MoistedK., Prahl-AndersenB., ZuurbierP., RumseyN., ShawW.C.The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship among treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction, and the burden of care.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 83–92.
31.
SinkoK., JagschR., PrechtlV., WatzingerF., HollmannK., BaumannA.Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 355–361.
32.
SliferK.J., AmariA., DiverT., HilleyL., BeckM., KaneA., McDonellS.Social interaction patterns of children and adolescents with and without oral clefts during a videotaped analogue social encounter.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2004; 41: 175–184.
33.
StraussR.P., BroderH.Directions and issues in psychosocial research and methods as applied to cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies.Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1991; 28: 150–156.
34.
Van LierdeK.M., MonstreyS., BonteK., Van CauwenbergeP., VinckB.The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2004; 68: 865–875.
35.
World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
