Craniosynostosis has been hypothesized to result in alterations of the brain and cerebral blood flow due to reduced intracranial volume, potentially leading to cognitive deficits. In this study we test the hypothesis that intracranial volume and whole brain volume in infants with unilateral coronal synostosis differs from those in unaffected infants.
Design
Our study sample consists of magnetic resonance images acquired from 7- to 72-week-old infants with right unilateral coronal synostosis prior to surgery (n = 10) and age-matched unaffected infants (n = 10). We used Analyze 9.0 software to collect three cranial volume measurements. We used nonparametric tests to determine whether the three measures differ between the two groups. Correlations were calculated between age and the three volume measures in each group to determine whether the growth trajectory of the measurements differ between children with right unicoronal synostosis and unaffected infants.
Results
Our results show that the three volume measurements are not reduced in infants with right unicoronal synostosis relative to unaffected children. Correlation analyses between age and various volume measures show similar correlations in infants with right unicoronal synostosis compared with unaffected children.
Conclusions
Our results show that the relationship between brain size and intracranial size in infants with right unicoronal synostosis is similar to that in unaffected children, suggesting that reduced intracranial volume is not responsible for alterations of the brain in craniosynostosis.
AldridgeK., KaneA.A., MarshJ.L., YanP., GovierD., RichtsmeierJ.T.Relationship of brain and skull in pre- and postoperative sagittal synostosis. J Anat.2005; 206: 373–385.
3.
AldridgeK., MarshJ.L., GovierD., RichtsmeierJ.T.Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis. J Anat.2002; 201: 31–39.
4.
AokiN.Intracranial changes with unilateral coronal synostosis. Surg Neurol.1984; 22: 249–252.
5.
BristolR.E., LekovicG.P., RekateH.L.The effects of craniosynostosis on the brain with respect to intracranial pressure. Semin Pediatr Neurol.2004; 11: 262–267.
6.
CamfieldP., CamfieldC., CohenM.Neurological aspects of craniosynostosis. In: CohenM., MacLeanR., eds. Craniosynostosis: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management.2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press;2000: 177–183.
7.
CarmelP., LukenM., AscherlG.Craniosynostosis: computed tomographic evaluation of skull base and calvarial deformities and associated intracranial changes. Neurosurgery.1981; 9: 366–372.
8.
CohenM., MacLeanR.Craniosynostosis: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management.2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press;2000.
FernbachS.K., FeinsteinK.A.Radiologic evaluation of the child with craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am.1991; 2: 569–585.
15.
FokH., JonesB.M., GaultD.G., AndarU., HaywardR.Relationship between intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in craniosynostosis. Br J Plast Surg.1992; 45: 394–397.
16.
GaultD.T., RenierD., MarchacD., AcklandF.M., JonesB.M.Intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg.1990; 1: 1–3.
17.
GaultD.T., RenierD., MarchacD., JonesB.M.Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg.1992; 90: 377–381.
18.
GuoZ., DingM., MuX., ChenR.Operative treatment of coronal craniosynostosis: 20 years of experience. Surg Neurol.2007; 68(Suppl 2): S18–S21, discussion S21.
19.
HukkiJ., SaarinenP., KangasniemiM.Single suture craniosynostosis: diagnosis and imaging. In: RiceD., ed. Craniofacial Sutures, Development, Disease and Treatment.Basel: Karger;2008: 79–90.
20.
Kapp-SimonK.A., SpeltzM.L., CunninghamM.L., PatelP.K., TomitaT.Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst.2007; 23: 269–281.
21.
LichtenbergR.Radiographic du crane de 226 enfants normaux de la naissance a 8 ans. Impressions digit-formes. Capacite: angles et indices.Paris: University of Paris;1960.
22.
MarshJ., LeeB., KaneA., KinY., ChristsenG., GadoM., KidoD., FrankelP., KobyM.Brain tomographic dysmorphology in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Fifty-fourth annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association; April 1997; New Orleans, Louisiana.
MooneyM.P., SiegelM.I., BurrowsA.M., SmithT.D., LoskenH.W., DechantJ., CooperG., Fellows-MayleW., KapucuM.R., KapucuL.O.A rabbit model of human familial, nonsyndromic unicoronal suture synostosis. II. Intracranial contents, intracranial volume, and intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst.1998; 14: 247–255.
25.
NetherwayD.J., AbbottA.H., AndersonP.J., DavidD.J.Intracranial volume in patients with nonsyndromal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg.2005; 103(Suppl 2): 137–141.
26.
PolleyJ., CharbelF., KimD., MaFeeM.Nonsyndromal craniosynostosis: longitudinal outcome following cranio-orbital reconstruction in infancy. Plast Reconstr Surg.1998; 102: 619–628.
27.
RenierD., LajeunieE., ArnaudE., MarchacD.Management of craniosynostoses. Childs Nerv Syst.2000; 16: 645–658.
28.
RenierD., Sainte-RoseC., MarchacD.Intracranial pressure in craniostenoses. In: MarchacD., ed. Craniofacial Surgery: Proceedings of the First International Congress of the International Society of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.New York: Springer-Verlag;1987: 110–113.
RichP.M., CoxT.C., HaywardR.D.The jugular foramen in complex and syndromic craniosynostosis and its relationship to raised intracranial pressure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2003; 24: 45–51.
31.
RichtsmeierJ.T., AldridgeK., DeLeonV.B., PanchalJ., KaneA.A., MarshJ.L., YanP., ColeT.M.3rd. Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol.2006; 306: 360–378.
32.
SgourosS.Skull vault growth in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst.2005; 21: 861–870.
SpeltzM.L., Kapp-SimonK., CollettB., KeichY., GaitherR., CradockM.M., BuonoL., CunninghamM.L.Neurodevelopment of infants with single-suture craniosynostosis: presurgery comparisons with case-matched controls. Plast Reconstr Surg.2007; 119: 1874–1881.
35.
SpeltzM.L., Kapp-SimonK.A., CunninghamM., MarshJ., DawsonG.Single-suture craniosynostosis: a review of neurobehavioral research and theory. J Pediatr Psychol.2004; 29: 651–668.
36.
StarrJ.R., Kapp-SimonK.A., CloonanY.K., CollettB.R., CradockM.M., BuonoL., CunninghamM.L., SpeltzM.L.Presurgical and postsurgical assessment of the neurodevelopment of infants with single-suture craniosynostosis: comparison with controls. J Neurosurg.2007; 107(Suppl 2): 103–110.
37.
TamburriniG., CaldarelliM., MassimiL., SantiniP., Di RoccoC.Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst.2005; 21: 913–921.
