Demographics of Orofacial Clefts in Canada from 2002 to 2008

Abstract

Objective

Orofacial clefts such as cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate are the most frequent congenital anomalies of the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to determine the current demographics for orofacial clefts in Canada.

Methods

A request for data from all Canadian provinces (excluding Quebec due to incompatibilities with provincial coding systems) for the fiscal years 2002–2003 to 2007–2008 was submitted to the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Variables evaluated included gender, cleft type, gestational age, birth weight, income quintile, and institution health region.

Results

Over the period studied, the prevalence of orofacial clefts ranged from 11.0 to 15.3 per 10,000 live births (1 in 654 to 1 in 909 live births). The distribution of cleft types for live births with orofacial clefts was 17% for cleft lip, 41% for cleft palate, and 42% for cleft lip and palate, of which cleft lip and cleft lip and palate were male dominant (62% and 66% male, respectively) and cleft palate was female dominant (56% female). Saskatchewan and Manitoba had significantly higher cleft birthrates (P < .05) compared with the other provinces. Birth weight and gestational age (but not income quintile) were significantly (P < .0001) lower for newborns with orofacial clefting compared with those with no cleft.

Conclusions

Canada has one of the highest orofacial cleft birthrates in the world (prevalence of 12.7 per 10,000 live births, approximately 1 in 790 live births). This study presents an updated demographic of orofacial clefts in Canadian newborns and may be useful in predicting the burden of anticipated health care.

Keywords

demographics oral clefts cleft lip and palate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Cleft–Palate Craniofacial Association.

Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30(suppl): S1–S16.

Cassell

C.H.

Meyer

Daniels

Health care expenditures among Medicaid enrolled children with and without orofacial clefts in North Carolina, 1995–2002.

Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008; 82: 785–794.

Finkler

S.A.

The distinction between cost and charges.

Ann Intern Med. 1982; 96: 102–109.

Grosse

Costs of care for children with orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Monitoring and Prevention in Georgia Partners’ Meeting; August 25, 2008; Atlanta, Georgia.

Hodgkinson

P.D.

Brown

Duncan

Grant

McNaughton

Thomas

Mattick

C.R.

Management of children with cleft lip and palate: a review describing the application of multidisciplinary team working in the condition based upon the experiences of a regional cleft lip and palate center in the United Kingdom.

Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2005; 16: 11–27.

Kohut

Rusen

I.D.

Congenital anomalies in Canada—a perinatal health report, 2002. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2002: 1–68.

Leon

J.A.

Rouleau

Oral clefting in Canada: a temporal analysis for the period 1989–2000. Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance Network—current topics, 2005. Available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccasn-rcsac/ct2005/or-cl-overview-eng.php. Accessed February 20, 2010.

Little

Overview of epidemiology and aetiology of orofacial clefts. Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance Network—current topics, 2005. Available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccasn-rcsac/ct2005/overview_julian-eng.php. Accessed January 25, 2010.

Neff

J.M.

Sharp

V.L.

Muldoon

Graham

Myers

Profile of medical charges for children by health status group and severity level in a Washington state health plan.

Health Serv Res. 2004; 39: 73–89.

10.

Robin

N.H.

Baty

Franklin

Guyton

F.C.

Mann

Woolley

A.L.

Waite

P.D.

Grant

The multidisciplinary evaluation and management of cleft lip and palate.

South Med J. 2006; 99: 1111–1120.

11.

Shah

C.P.

Wong

Management of children with cleft lip and palate.

Can Med Assoc J. 1980; 122: 19–24.

12.

Tollefson

T.T.

Wong

J.K.

Sykes

J.M.

Larrabee

Jr . Cleft lip-palate deformities in Western China: epidemiology, surgical reconstruction, and cost. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006; 8: 234–239.

13.

Waitzman

N.J.

Romano

P.S.

Scheffler

R.M.

Estimates of the economic costs of birth defects.

Inquiry. 1994; 31: 188–205.

14.

World Health Organization. Global registry and database on craniofacial anomalies—report of a WHO registry meeting on craniofacial anomalies, Bauru, Brazil, 4–6 December 2001. Geneva, 2003. Available at http://www.who.int/genomics/anomalies/en/Chapter00.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2011.

15.

World Health Organization. Global strategies to reduce the heath-care burden of craniofacial anomalies: report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies, Geneva, Switzerland, 5–8 November 2000; Park City, Utah, U.S.A., 24–26 May 2001. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590386.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2011.

16.

World Health Organization. Addressing the global challenges of craniofacial anomalies—report of a WHO meeting on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. Geneva, 2006. Available at http://www.who.int/genomics/publications/CFA%20Completed%20text.pdf Accessed September 1, 2011.

17.

Wyszynski

Prenatal and perinatal factors associated with isolated oral clefting.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 39: 370–375.

18.

Yazdy

M.M.

Honein

M.A.

Rasmussen

S.A.

Frias

J.L.

Priorities for future public health research in orofacial clefts.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007; 44: 351–357.

19.

Zucchero

T.M.

Interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene variants and the risk of isolated cleft lip or palate.

New Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 769–780.