Abstract
Objective
To compare the accuracy of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and panoramic radiography in the evaluation of mandibular hypoplasia in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM).
Design
Retrospective study of imaging data.
Setting
Images selected from the archives of the University of Tokyo Hospital.
Subjects
Twenty patients with unilateral HFM who had undergone both panoramic radiography and 3D-CT in the same period.
Method
Mandibular deformities were classified according to the Pruzansky classification; eight patients had Grade I deformity and 12 patients had Grade II deformity. Ramus heights were measured on both panoramic radiographs and 3D-CT.
Main outcome measures
Magnification in panoramic radiographs and extent of mandibular asymmetry as estimated by the affected/unaffected side ratio based on two methods were examined. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to estimate correlations between parameters.
Results
The magnification of ramus heights on panoramic radiographs showed large variations in Grade II patients. The affected/unaffected side ratio estimated by the two methods showed a strong correlation in Grade I patients (correlation coefficient 0.99; p < .0001). Conversely, a weak correlation was seen in Grade II patients (correlation coefficient 0.77; p = .0036), and affected/unaffected side ratios from panoramic radiographs were both over- and underestimated.
Conclusions
The accuracy of evaluation using panoramic radiography was fairly reliable in Grade I patients. Conversely, accuracy was poor in Grade II patients, and evaluation using 3D-CT seems preferable. The combination of two methods with careful consideration is recommended for clinical applications.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.