Scoring Systems of Cleft-Related Facial Deformities: A Review of Literature

Abstract

Objective

There is a need for an internationally agreed objective method of assessing cleft-related deformities in order to compare the results of individual surgeons and different surgical techniques or to determine the optimal timing for primary lip closure. To assess the current methods, an overview of the recent developments in postoperative scoring systems of cleft-related deformities was made.

Methods

A Medline search from June 2003 through July 2011 was conducted, and references in the selected articles were checked. This search yielded 428 articles, and after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 articles were included in this review.

Results

Twenty-five studies used two-dimensional (2D) photographs for the assessment of cleft-related deformities. Fourteen of these studies used a subjective method for the assessment and 11 performed anthropometric measurements. Good reliability has been found for subjective assessments and measurements from 2D photographs. Fifteen studies assessed three-dimensional (3D) imaging.

Conclusions

Although there is a wide variety in study design, 3D imaging seems most reliable in assessing cleft-related facial deformities. However, scoring on 2D photographs is easier to perform and more applicable in daily practice because all cleft patients are photographed through the course of their treatment.

Keywords

assessment cleft lip facial appearance scoring system symmetry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Omari

Millett

D.T.

Ayoub

Bock

Ray

Dunaway

Crampin

An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003; 40: 530–537.

Al-Omari

Millett

D.T.

Ayoub

A.F.

Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: a review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 145–156.

Asher-McDade

Roberts

Shaw

W.C.

Gallager

Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 385–390.

Ayoub

Bell

Simmons

Bowman

Brown

T.W.

Xiao

3D assessment of lip scarring and residual dysmorphology following surgical repair of cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011a; 48: 379–387. 2010a Aug 17. [Epub ahead of print]

Ayoub

Garrahy

Millett

Bowman

Siebert

Miller

Ray

Three-dimensional assessment of early surgical outcome in repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: part 1. Nasal changes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011b; 48: 571–577. 2010b Aug 11. [Epub ahead of print]

Ayoub

Garrahy

Millett

Bowman

Siebert

Miller

Ray

Three-dimensional assessment of early surgical outcome in repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: part 2. Lip changes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011c; 48: 578–583. 2010c Sep 8. [Epub ahead of print]

Baeyens

Daelemans

Leloup

De Mey

Study of changes in nasal morphology in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after secondary bone grafting measured with image analysis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006; 40: 345–351.

Baudouin

J.Y.

Tiberghien

Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004; 117: 313–332.

Bilwatsch

Kramer

Haeusler

Schuster

Wurm

Vairaktaris

Neukam

F.W.

Nkenke

Nasolabial symmetry following Tennison-Randall lip repair: a three-dimensional approach in 10-year-old patients with unilateral clefts of lip, alveolus and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006; 34: 253–262.

10.

Bonett

D.G.

Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002; 21: 1331–1335.

11.

Bongaarts

C.A.M.

Prahl-Andersen

Bronkhorst

E.M.

Spauwen

P.H.M.

Mulder

J.W.

Vaandrager

J.M.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Effect of infant orthopedics on facial appearance of toddlers with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45: 407–413.

12.

Brattström

Mlsted

Prahl-Andersen

Semb

Shaw

W.C.

The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 69–77.

13.

Chang

C.S.

Por

Y.C.

Liou

E.J.

Chang

C.J.

Chen

P.K.

Noordhoff

M.S.

Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1276–1284.

14.

Daelemans

Leloup

Decaesteker

De Mey

New digital method for quantitative assessment of nasal morphology. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006; 40: 335–344.

15.

Devlin

M.F.

Ray

Raine

Bowman

Ayoub

A.F.

Facial symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate following alar base augmentation with bone graft: a three-dimensional assessment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007; 44: 391–395.

16.

Farkas

L.G.

Hajnis

Posnick

J.C.

Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 1–12.

17.

Flores

R.L.

Sailon

A.M.

Cutting

C.B.

A novel cleft rhinoplasty procedure combining an open rhinoplasty with the Dibbell and Tajima techniques: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 2041–2047.

18.

Fudalej

Katsaros

Bongaarts

Dudkiewicz

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67: 1661–1666.

19.

Goodacre

T.E.E.

Hentges

Moss

T.L.H.

Short

Murray

Does repairing a cleft lip neonatally have any effect on the longer-term attractiveness of the repair?

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004; 41: 603–608.

20.

Gosain

A.K.

Fathi

A.H.

Assessment of secondary cleft rhinoplasty using resorbable plates at the age of primary school. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 1801–1805.

21.

Shi

Kamdar

Zheng

Wang

Development of a method for rating nasal appearance after cleft lip repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1437–1441.

22.

Hood

C.A.

Bock

Hosey

M.T.

Bowman

Ayoub

A.F.

Facial asymmetry—3D assessment of infants with cleft lip & palate. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003; 13: 404–410.

23.

Hunt

Burden

Hepper

Johnston

The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 274–285.

24.

Kalaaji

Lilja

Friede

Elander

Bone grafting in the mixed and permanent dentition in cleft lip and palate patients: long-term results and the role of the surgeon's experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1996; 24: 29–35.

25.

Kim

J.B.

Strike

Cadier

M.C.

A simple assessment method for auditing multi-centre unilateral cleft lip repairs. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 195–200.

26.

Kim

S.C.

Nam

K.C.

Rah

D.K.

Cha

E.J.

Kim

D.W.

Assessment of the cleft nasal deformity using a regression equation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46: 197–203.

27.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Nollet

PJPM

Semb

Bronkhorst

E.M.

Shaw

W.C.

Katsaros

Reference photographs for nasolabial appearance rating in unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 1683–1686.

28.

Liou

E.J.W.

Subramanian

Chen

P.K.T.

Huang

C.S.

The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding: a three-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114: 858–864.

29.

Mani

M.R.

Semb

Andlin-Sobocki

Nasolabial appearance in adults with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: relation between professional and lay rating and patients' satisfaction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2010; 44: 191–198.

30.

Mars

Plint

D.A.

Houston

W.J.B.

Bergland

Semb

The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 314–322.

31.

Mercado

A.M.

Russell

K.A.

Hathaway

R.R.

Daskalogiannakis

Sadek

Long

R.E.

Cohen

Semb

Shaw

W.C.

The Americleft Study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. nasolabial esthetics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48: 265–270.

32.

Meyer-Marcotty

Alpers

G.W.

Gerdes

A.B.M.

Stellzig-Eisenhauer

Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 168.e1–e8.

33.

Mlsted

Treatment outcome in cleft lip and palate: issues and perspectives. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999; 10: 225–239.

34.

Mosmuller

D.G.

Bijnen

C.L.

Don Griot

J.P.

Niessen

F.B.

Letter to the editor: a simple assessment method for auditing multi-centre unilateral cleft lip repairs. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64: 554.

35.

Mossey

Castillia

Global Registry and Database on Craniofacial Anomalies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

36.

Nagy

Mommaerts

M.Y.

Analysis of the cleft-lip nose in submentalvertical view, Part I—reliability of a new measurement instrument. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007; 35: 265–277.

37.

Nkenke

Lehner

Kramer

Haeusler

Benz

Schuster

Neukam

F.W.

Vairaktaris

E.G.

Wurm

Determination of facial symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from three-dimensional data: technical report and assessment of measurement errors. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006; 43: 129–137.

38.

Nollet

P.J.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Chatzigianni

Semb

Shaw

W.C.

Bronkhorst

E.M.

Katsaros

Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007; 35: 278–286. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

39.

Pai

B.C.

E.W.

Huang

C.S.

Liou

E.J.W.

Symmetry of the nose after presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 658–663.

40.

Prahl

Prahl-Andersen

van't Hof

M.A.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Infant orthopedics and facial appearance: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft). Cleft PalateCraniofac J. 2006; 43: 659–664.

41.

Rahman

Majumdar

S.K.

Ahmed

Singha

J.L.

Majid

M.A.

Hasan

M.R.

Repair of cleft lip on relatively older children with anthropometrical surgical outcome. Mymensingh Med J. 2006; 15: 89–95.

42.

Ras

Habets

LLMH

Vanginkel

F.C.

Prahlandersen

Facial left-right dominance in cleft-lip and palate: three-dimension evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994; 31: 461–465.

43.

Ras

Habets

LLMH

Vanginkel

F.C.

Prahlandersen

Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994; 31: 116–121.

44.

Reddy

S.G.

Nagy

Mommaerts

M.Y.

Reddy

R.R.

Bronkhorst

E.M.

Prasad

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Bergé

Primary septoplasty in the repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 761–767.

45.

Reddy

S.G.

Reddy

R.R.

Bronkhorst

E.M.

Prasad

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Bergé

Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010a; 125: 1208–1216.

46.

Rhodes

Geddes

Jeffery

Dziurawiec

Clark

Are average and symmetric faces attractive to infants? Discrimination and looking preferences. Perception. 2002; 31: 315–321.

47.

Sander

Daskalogiannakis

Tompson

Forrest

Effect of alveolar bone-grafting on nasal morphology, symmetry and nostril shape of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48: 20–27.

48.

Schwenzer-Zimmerer

Boerner

B.I.

Schwenzer

N.F.

Muller

A.A.

Juergens

Ringenbach

Schkommodau

Zeilhofer

H.F.

Facial acquisition by dynamic optical tracked laser imaging: a new approach. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1181–1186.

49.

Schwenzer-Zimmerer

Chaitidis

Berg-Boerner

Krol

Kovacs

Schwenzer

N.F.

Zimmerer

Holberg

Zeilhofer

H.F.

Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008; 36: 431–438.

50.

Schwenzer-Zimmerer

Chaitidis

Borner

B.I.

Kovacs

Sader

Zeilhofer

H.F.

Holberg

Lip, jaw, and palate clefts. Analysis of unilateral cleft lip using 3-D laser topometry [in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2006; 10: 377–384.

51.

Sforza

Laino

D'Alessio

Dellavia

Grandi

Ferrario

V.F.

Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive children and normal children in the deciduous and early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 1025–1033.

52.

Springer

I.N.

Wannicke

Warnke

P.H.

Zernial

Wiltfang

Russo

P.A.

Terheyden

Reinhardt

Wolfart

Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 156–162.

53.

Stauber

Vairaktaris

Holst

Schuster

Hirschfelderl

Neukam

F.W.

Nkenke

Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data [in English, German]. J Orofac Orthop. 2008; 69: 268–282.

54.

Tanikawa

D.Y.

Alonso

Rocha

D.L.

Evaluation of primary cleft nose repair: severity of the cleft versus final position of the nose. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1519–1524.

55.

Trotman

C.A.

Phillips

Essick

G.K.

Faraway

J.J.

Barlow

S.M.

Losken

H.W.

van Aalst

Rogers

Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part I: study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007; 44: 598–606.

56.

van der Veer

W.M.

Bloemen

M.C.T.

Ulrich

M.M.W.

Molema

van Zuijlen

P.P.

Middelkoop

Niessen

F.B.

Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns. 2009; 35: 15–29.

57.

van Loon

Maal

T.J.

Plooij

J.M.

Ingels

K.J.

Borstlap

W.A.

Kuijpers-Jagtman

A.M.

Spauwen

P.H.

Bergé

S.J.

3D Stereophotogrammetric assessment of pre- and postoperative volumetric changes in the cleft lip and palate nose. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 534–540. 2010 Apr 27. [Epub ahead of print]

58.

Vegter

Hage

J.J.

Standardized facial photography of cleft patients: just fit the grid?

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000; 37: 435–440.

59.

Walter

S.D.

Eliasziw

Donner

Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101–110.

60.

Williams

A.C.

Sandy

J.R.

Thomas

Sell

Sterne

J.A.C.

Influence of surgeon's experience on speech outcome in cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1697–1698.

61.

Witt

P.D.

Wahlen

J.C.

Marsh

J.L.

Grames

L.M.

Pilgram

T.K.

The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 1375–1384.

62.

Young

Cleft Lip and Palate. Available at http://www2.utmb.edu/otoref/Grnds/Cleft-lip-palate-9801/Cleft-lip-palate-9801.htm. Accessed March 26, 2011.