Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Airways of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Methods

Abstract

Aim

Comparison of nasopharyngeal airway dimensions among UCLP patients and the control group.

Materials and Methods

Computed tomography imaging data and cephalometric films of 20 patients with UCLP and 20 controls were acquired prior to treatment. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of nasal, superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal airways were carried out from dicom data, and volumes of these compartments were calculated. Nasal width and superior, middle, and inferior nasopharyngeal areas were calculated from cephalometric films.

Results

The only statistically significant difference among the cleft and noncleft patients was detected in nasal volume (p < .01). Upper and middle pharyngeal airway areas were found to display significant larger areas in the noncleft group on cephalometric appraisal. Nonsignificantly larger nasal widths were measured in the cleft group.

Discussion and Conclusion

Evaluation of the nasopharyngeal airways of cleft and noncleft patients was done, resulting in only the nasal region showing statistically significant difference. Our results showed significantly lower nasal volume measurements of cleft patients when compared with the healthy individuals (p < .01). This inadequacy can be interpreted as an outcome of the deficiency. The controversy among results of cephalometric appraisal and 3D imaging can be associated with superimpositions, density, and contrast inadequacies and obscured landmarks. When 2D data are compared with 3D data, the former can be insufficient and therefore deceiving. Consequently, although the radiation dose of 3D imaging systems is greater, they have the advantage of superior diagnostic outputs.

Keywords

2D 3D nasopharyngeal airways unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboudara

Nielsen

Huang

J.C.

Maki

Miller

A.J.

Hatcher

Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 468–479.

Alves

P.V.

Zhao

O'Gara

Patel

P.K.

Bolognase

A.M.

Three-dimensional cephalometric study of upper airway space in J Craniofac Surg. 2008; 19: 1497–1507.

Angle

Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth. Philadelphia: SS White Manufacturing Company; 1907.

Cakmak

Celik

Cankurtaran

Buyuklu

Ozgirgin

Ozluoglu

L.N.

Effects of paranasal sinus ostia and volume on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study.

J Appl Physiol. 2003; 94: 1527–1535.

Cameron

C.G.

Franchi

Baccetti

McNamara

Jr . Long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121: 129–135.

Cankurtaran

Celik

Coşkun

Hizal

Cakmak

Acoustic rhinometry in healthy humans: accuracy of area estimates and ability to quantify certain anatomic structures in the nasal cavity.

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007; Dec;116 (12): 906–16.

Dalson

R.M.

Warren

D.W.

Dalston

E.T.A.

Preliminary study of nasal airway patency and its potential effect on speech performance.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 330–335.

Dang

Honda

Suzuki

Morphological and acoustical analysis of the nasal and the paranasal cavities. 1994; 96: 2088–2100.

Drettner

The nasal airway and hearing in patients with cleft palate.

Acta Otolaryngol. 1960; 52: 131–142.

10.

Fukushiro

A.P.

Trindade

I.E.

Nasal airway dimensions of adults with cleft lip and palate: differences among cleft types.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 396–402.

11.

Grauer

Cevidanes

L.S.

Styner

M.A.

Ackerman

J.L.

Proffit

W.R.

Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: relationship to facial morphology.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 805–814.

12.

Ghoneima

Kula

Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for airway volume analysis.

Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug 10. [Epub ahead of print]

13.

Graber

T.M.

Vanarsdall

R.L.

Jr Vig

K.W.L.

Orthodontics. Current principles and techniques, 4th edition. Elsevier, St Louis, Missouri, USA. 2005.

14.

Gribel

B.F.

Gribel

M.N.

Frazao

D.C.

McNamara

Jr Manzi

F.R.

Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.

Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 26–35.

15.

Guijarro-Martinez

Swennen

G.R.

Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging and analysis of the upper airway: a systematic review of the literature.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 1227–1237.

16.

Hairfield

W.M.

Warren

D.W.

Dimensions of the cleft nasal airway in adults: a comparison with subjects without cleft.

Cleft Palate J. 1989; 26: 9–13.

17.

Hilberg

Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects.

Allergy. 2002; 57(Suppl 70): 5–39.

18.

Hilberg

Jensen

F.T.

Pedersen

O.F.

Nasal airway geometry: comparison between acoustic reflections and magnetic resonance scanning.

J Appl Physiol. 1993; 75: 2811–2819.

19.

Hoffstein

Weiser

Haney

Roentgenographic dimensions of the upper airway in snoring patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea.

Chest. 1991; 100: 81–85.

20.

Jakobsone

Neimane

Krumina

Two- and three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway after bimaxillary correction of Class III malocclusion.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 110: 234–242.

21.

Kim

Y.J.

Hong

J.S.

Hwang

Y.I.

Park

Y.H.

Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 306.e301–311.

22.

Kummer

A.W.

Speech therapy for errors secondary to cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Semin Speech Lang. 2011; 32: 191–198.

23.

Lenza

M.G.

Lenza

M.M.D.

Dalstra

Melsen

Cattaneo

P.M.

An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: a CBCT study.

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010; 13: 96–105.

24.

Linder-Aronson

Woodside

D.G.A.

Mandibular growth direction following adenoidectomy.

Am J Orthod. 1986; 89: 273–284.

25.

Lowe

A.A.

Fleetham

J.A.

Two and three dimensional analysis of tongue, airway and soft palate size. In: Atlas of Difficult Airway. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1991: 74–82.

26.

Lowe

A.A.

Fleetham

J.A.

Adachi

Ryan

C.F.

Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107: 589–595.

27.

Lowe

A.A.

Gionhaku

Takeuchi

Fleetham

J.A.

Three-dimensional CT reconstructions of tongue and airway in adult subjects with obstructive sleep apnea.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 90: 364–374.

28.

Mani

Moren

Thorvardsson

Jakobsson

Skoog

Holmstrom

Objective assessment of the nasal airway in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a long-term study.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010; 47: 217–224.

29.

McNamara

J.A.

Influence of respiratory pattern on craniofacial growth.

Angle Orthod. 1981; 51: 269–300.

30.

Olmez

Gorgulu

Akin

Bengi

A.O.

Tekdemir

Ors

Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.

Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 375–382.

31.

Pae

E.K.

Lowe

A.A.

Sasaki

Price

Tsuchiya

Fleetham

J.A.

A cephalometric and electromyographic study of upper airway structures in the upright and supine positions.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106: 52–59.

32.

Pirelli

Saponara

De Rosa

Fanucci

Orthodontics and obstructive sleep apnea in children.

Med Clin North Am. 2010; 94: 517–529.

33.

Sandham

Solow

Nasal respiratory resistance in cleft lip and palate.

Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 278–285.

34.

Smahel

Müllerova

Nasopharyngeal characteristics in children with cleft lip and palate.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 282–286.

35.

Tarhan

Coskun

Cakmak

Celik

Cankurtaran

Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size.

J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99(2): 616–623.

36.

Trindade

I.E.

Bertier

C.E.

Sampaio-Teixeira

A.C.

Objective assessment of internal nasal dimensions and speech resonance in individuals with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate after rhinoseptoplasty.

J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20: 308–314.

37.

Trindade

I.E.

Manco

J.C.

Trindade

Jr . Pulmonary function of individuals with congenital cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29: 429–434.

38.

Wahlmam

Kunkel

Wagner

Preoperative assessment of airway patency in the planning of corrective cleft nose surgery.

Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1998; (2 suppl 1): S153–S157.

39.

Warren

D.W.

Compensatory speech behaviors in individuals with cleft palate: a regulation/control phenomenon?

Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23: 251–260.

40.

Warren

D.W.

Drake

A.F.

Dalson

E.T.

The relationship between nasal airway size and nasal-oral breathing in cleft lip and palate.

Cleft Palate J. 1990; 27: 46–52.

41.

Warren

D.W.

Drake

Davis

J.U.

Nasal airway in breathing and speech.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992; 29(6): 511–519.

42.

Warren

D.W.

Duany

L.F.

Fischer

N.D.

Nasal pathway resistance in normal and cleft lip and palate subjects.

Cleft Palate J. 1969; 6: 134–140.