Developing a Measure of Appraisal: A Psychometric Analysis of the Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire

Abstract

Objective

To develop a questionnaire measure of appraisals for parents of children with a cleft (the Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire) and to investigate the ability of the Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire to predict variance in parental well-being.

Design, Participants, Setting

The study used a cross-sectional postal and online questionnaire design with a retest component involving parents of children with a cleft lip and/or palate. Data are presented for 179 parents, predominantly women (74.9%), aged 22 to 58 years.

Main Outcome Measures

Participants completed the appraisal measure under development; other measures of psychological well-being, social support, and socially desirable responding; and demographic information.

Results

Overall, the Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire was found to have a coherent factor structure, good internal reliability, and good test-retest reliability. The Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire was also found to predict a significant amount of unique variance in well-being over and above the variance predicted by demographic, social support, and social desirability variables.

Conclusions

Parental appraisals, measured by the Parental Appraisal of Cleft Questionnaire, were found to predict unique variance in well-being. These findings are discussed in relation to adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate for parents. Directions for future research are outlined and the implications for clinical practice and services are discussed.

Keywords

appraisal cleft lip and palate parents psychological adjustment well-being

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

S.R.

Owens

Stern

Willmot

Coping strategies and social support in the family impact of cleft lip and palate and parents' adjustment and psychological distress. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46: 229–236.

Barden

R.C.

Ford

M.E.

Jenson

A.G.

Rogers-Salyer

Salyer

K.E.

Effects of craniofacial deformity in infancy on the quality of mother-infant interactions. Child Devel. 1989; 60: 819–824.

Berger

Z.E.

Dalton

L.J.

Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46: 435–443.

Berger

Z.E.

Dalton

L.J.

Coping with a cleft II: factors associated with psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48: 82–90.

Bradbury

Psychological approaches to children and adolescents with disfigurement: a review of the literature. ACPP Rev Newslett. 1993; 15: 1–6.

Braun

Clarke

Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77–101.

Broder

H.L.

Strauss

R.P.

Psychological problems and referrals among oral-facial team patients. J Rehab. 1991; 57: 31–36.

Chassany

Dimenäs

Dubois

The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) User Manual. Lyon: MAPI Research Institute; 2004.

Cochrane

V.M.

Slade

Appraisal and coping in adults with cleft lip: associations with well-being and social anxiety. Br J Med Psychol. 1999; 72: 485–503.

10.

Cohen

A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155–159.

11.

Dillman

D.A.

The design and administration of mail surveys. Ann Rev Sociol. 1991; 17: 225–249.

12.

Dupuy

H.J.

The Psychological General Weil-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger

N.K.

Mattson

M.E.

Furberg

C.D.

Elinson

Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. Washington, DC: Le Jacq Publishing; 1984: 170–183.

13.

Endriga

M.C.

Kapp-Simon

K.A.

Psychological issues in craniofacial care: state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999; 36: 3–11.

14.

Field

Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009.

15.

Hays

R.D.

Hayashi

Stewart

A.L.

A five-item measure of Socially Desirable Response Set. Educ Psychol Meas. 1989; 49: 629–636.

16.

Hunt

Burden

Hepper

Johnston

The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 274–285.

17.

Lazarus

R.S.

Folkman

Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

18.

Lockhart

The mental health needs of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003; 8: 7–16.

19.

Murray

Arteche

Bingley

Hentges

Bishop

D.V.M.

Dalton

Goodacre

Hill

, and the Cleft Lip and Palate Study team. The effect of cleft lip on socio-emotional functioning in school-aged children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010; 51: 94–103.

20.

Nelson

O'Leary

Weinman

Causal attributions in parents of babies with a cleft lip and/or palate and their association with psychological well-being. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 46: 425–434.

21.

Pallant

SPSS: Survival Manual. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.

22.

Sank

J.R.

Berk

N.W.

Cooper

M.E.

Marazita

M.L.

Perceived social support of mothers of children with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002; 40: 165–171.

23.

Sarason

I.G.

Levine

H.M.

Basham

R.B.

Sarason

B.R.

Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 44: 127–139.

24.

Sarason

I.G.

Sarason

B.R.

Shearin

E.N.

Pierce

G.R.

A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987; 4: 497–510.

25.

Speltz

M.L.

Armsden

G.C.

Clarren

S.S.

Effects of craniofacial birth defects on maternal functioning postinfancy. J Pediatr Psychol. 1990; 15: 177–196.

26.

Speltz

M.L.

Morton

Goodell

E.W.

Clarren

S.K.

Psychological functioning of children with craniofacial anomalies and their mothers: follow-up from late infancy to school entry. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 482–489.

27.

Tabachnick

B.G.

Fidell

L.S.

Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.

28.

Tedeschi

R.G.

Calhoun

L.G.

Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry. 2004; 15: 1–18.