Explore psychological functioning in adolescents with a cleft at age 16 from a broad perspective, including cognitive, emotional, behavioral, appearance-related, and psychosocial adjustment. High-risk groups were identified within each area of adjustment to investigate whether vulnerable adolescents were found across domains or whether risk was limited to specific areas of adjustment.
Methods
Cross-sectional data based on psychological assessments at age 16 (N = 857). The effect of gender, cleft visibility, and the presence of an additional condition were investigated on all outcome variables. Results were compared with large national samples.
Measures
Hopkins Symptom Checklist, Harter Self-Perception Scale for Adolescents, Child Experience Questionnaire, and Satisfaction With Appearance scale.
Results
The main factor influencing psychological adjustment across domains was gender, with girls in general reporting more psychological problems, as seen in reference groups. The presence of an additional condition also negatively affected some of the measures. No support was found for cleft visibility as a risk factor except for dissatisfaction with appearance. Correlation analyses of risk groups seem to point to an association between social and emotional risk and between social risk and dissatisfaction with appearance. Associations between other domains were found to be weak.
Conclusions
The results point to areas of both risk and strength in adolescents born with a cleft lip and/or palate. Future research should investigate how protective factors could counteract potential risk in adolescents with a cleft.
AaslandA., DisethT.H.Can the Harter Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents (SPPA) be used as an indicator of psychosocial outcome in adolescents with chronic physical disorders?Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.1999; 8: 78–85.
2.
Appearance Research Collaboration.Identifying Factors and Processes Contributing to Successful Adjustment to Disfiguring Conditions.Bristol: University of the West of England, Centre for Appearance Research;2009. Final report.
3.
BakerS.R., OwensJ., SternM., WillmotD.Coping strategies and social support in the family impact of cleft lip and palate and parents' adjustment and psychological distress. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 229–236.
4.
BergerZ.E., DaltonL.J.Coping with a cleft: psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2009; 46: 435–443.
5.
BergerZ.E., DaltonL.J.Coping with a cleft II: factors associated with psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2011; 48: 82–90.
6.
BerndtT.J., HawkinsJ.A., JiaoZ.Influences of friends and friendships on adjustment to junior high school. Merrill Palmer Q.1999; 45: 13–41.
7.
BroderH.L.Using psychological assessment and therapeutic strategies to enhance well-being. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 248–254.
8.
BroderH.L., RichmanL.C., MathesonP.B.Learning disability, school achievement and grade retention among children with cleft: a two-center study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.1998; 35: 127–131.
9.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CollettB.R., SpeltzM.L.A developmental approach to mental health for children and adolescents with orofacial clefts. Orthod Craniofac Res.2007; 10: 138–148.
11.
CollinsW.A.More than myth: the developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. J Res Adolesc.2003; 13: 1–24.
12.
DekkerM.C., FerdinandR.F., Van LangN.D.J., BongersI.L., Van Der EndeJ., VerhulstF.C.Developmental trajectories of depressive symptoms from early childhood to late adolescence: gender differences and adult outcome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2007; 48: 657–666.
13.
EmersonM., Spencer-BowdagS., BatesA.Relationships between self-esteem, social experiences and satisfaction with appearance: standardisation and construct validation of two cleft audit measures. Presented at The Craniofacial Society of Great Britain and Ireland's Annual Scientific Conference, “Setting a Positive Agenda in Cleft and Craniofacial Care”; April 2004; Bath, United Kingdom.
14.
FeragenK.J.B., BorgeA.I.H.Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference. Body Image.2010; 7: 97–105.
15.
FeragenK.J.B., KvalemI.L., RumseyN., BorgeA.I.H.Adolescents with and without a facial difference: the role of friendships and social acceptance in perceptions of appearance and emotional resilience. Body Image.2010; 7: 271–279.
16.
FeragenK.J.B., StockN.M.When there is more than a cleft: Psychosocial adjustment in children with an associated condition. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014; 51: 5–14.
17.
FeragenK.J.B., StockN.M., RumseyN.Toward a reconsideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria in cleft lip and palate: implications for psychological research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2014; 51: 569–578.
18.
GalambosN.L.Gender and gender role development in adolescence. In: LernerR.M., SteinbergL., eds. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons;2004: 233–262.
19.
GoodmanR.Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2001; 40: 1337–1345.
20.
GoodmanR.The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1997; 38: 581–586.
21.
GriffithsC., WilliamsonH., RumseyN.The romantic experiences of adolescents with a visible difference: exploring concerns, protective factors and support needs. J Health Psychol.2012; 17: 1053–1064.
22.
HarterS.Manual for the Adolescent Self-Perception Profile.Denver, CO: University of Denver: 1988.
23.
HeiervangE., GoodmanA., GoodmanR.The Nordic advantage in child mental health: separating health differences from reporting style in a cross-cultural comparison of psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2008; 49: 678–685.
24.
HuntO., BurdenD., HepperP., JohnstonC.The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod.2005; 27: 274–285.
25.
KandellD.B., DaviesM.Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents: an empirical study. Arch Gen Psychiatry.1982; 39: 1205–1212.
26.
KleveL., RumseyN., Wyn-WilliamsM., WhiteP.The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural interventions provided at outlook: a disfigurement support unit. J Eval Clin Practice.2002; 8: 387–395.
27.
KumpferK.L.Factors and processes contributing to resilience: the resilience framework. In: GlantzM.D., JohnsonJ.L., eds. Resilience and Development: Positive Life Adaptations.New York: Klumer Academic/Plenum;1999: 179–224.
28.
LockerD., JakovicA., TompsonB.Health-related quality of life of children aged 11 to 14 years with orofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 260–266.
29.
LutharS.S.Resilience in development: a synthesis of research across five decades. In: CicchettiD., CohenD.J., eds. Developmental Psychopathology: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation.2nd ed.New York: Wiley & Sons;2006: 739–795.
30.
ManiM., ReiserE., Andlin-SobockiA., SkoogV., HolmströmM.Factors related to quality of life and satisfaction with nasal appearance in patients treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: 432–439.
31.
MastenA.S.Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. Am Psychol.2001; 56: 227–238.
32.
MileradJ., LarsonO., HagbergC., IdebergM.Associated malformations in infants with cleft lip and palate: a prospective population-based study. Pediatrics.1997; 100: 180–186.
33.
MillarK., BellA., BowmanA., BrownD., LoT-W, SiebertP., SimmonsD., AyoubA.Psychological status as a function of residual scarring and facial asymmetry after surgical repair of cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: 150–157.
34.
MillardT., RichmanL.C.Different cleft conditions facial appearance and speech: relation to psychological variables. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2001; 38: 68–75.
35.
MossT.P.The relationships between objective and subjective ratings of disfigurement severity and psychological adjustment. Body Image.2005; 2: 151–159.
36.
NangleD.W., ErdleyC.A., NewmanJ.E., MasonC.A., CarpenterE.M.Popularity, friendship quantity and friendship quality: interactive influences on children's loneliness and depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol.2003; 32: 546–555.
37.
Nolen-HoeksemaS., GirgusJ.S.The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychol Bull.1994; 115: 424–443.
38.
NopoulosP., ChoeI., BergS., Van DemarkD., CanadyJ., RichmanL.Ventral frontal cortex morphology in adult males with isolated orofacial clefts: relationship to abnormalities in social function. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 138–144.
39.
NopoulosP., LangbehnD.R., CanadyJ., MagnottaV., RichmanL.C.Abnormal brain structure in children with isolated clefts of the lip or palate. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2007; 161: 753–758.
40.
NurmiJ-E. Socialization and self-development. Channeling, selection, adjustment, and reflection. In: LernerR.M., SteinbergL., eds. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons,;2004: 85–124.
41.
PaxtonS.J., EisenbergM.E., Neumark-SztainerD.Prospective predictors of body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls and boys: a five-year longitudinal study. Dev Psychol.2006; 42: 888–899.
42.
PerssonM., BeckerM., SvenssonH.Academic achievement in individuals with clefts: a population-based register study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2012; 49: 153–159.
43.
PertschukM.J., WhitakerL.A.Social and psychological effects of craniofacial deformity and surgical reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg.1982; 9: 297–306.
44.
PharesV., LopezE., FieldsS., KamboukosD., DuhigA.M.Are fathers involved in pediatric psychology research and treatment?J Pediatr Psychol.2005; 30: 631–643.
45.
PopeA.W., SnyderH.T.Psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with a craniofacial anomaly: age and sex patterns. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 349–354.
46.
RichmanL.C., MillardT.Cleft lip and palate: longitudinal behavior and relationships of cleft conditions to behavior and achievement. J Pediatr Psychol.1997; 22: 487–494.
47.
RichmanL.C., WilgenbuschT., HallT.Spontaneous verbal labeling: visual memory and reading ability in children with cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2005; 42: 565–569.
48.
RobertsR.M., MathiasJ.L.Predictors of mental health in adults with congenital craniofacial conditions attending the Australian craniofacial unit. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: 414–423.
49.
RobertsR.M., MathiasJ.L., WheatonP.Cognitive functioning in children and adults with nonsyndromal cleft lip and/or palate: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol.2012; 37: 786–797.
50.
RognerudM., StrandB.H., DalgardO.S.Psykisk helse i Helse- og levekårsundersøkelsen i 1998. 1. Sosioøkonomiske forskjeller i psykisk helse og livsstil [Mental health in Norway 1998. 1. Socioeconomic differences in mental health and lifestyle]. Norsk Epidemiologi.2002; 12: 239–248.
51.
RumseyN., HarcourtD.The Psychology of Appearance.Berkshire, UK: Open University Press;2005.
52.
RumseyN., StockN.M.Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In: BerkowitzD., ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management.3rd ed.Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2013: 907–917.
53.
RutterM.Understanding and testing risk mechanisms for mental disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2009; 50: 44–52.
54.
RønningJ.A., HandegaardB.H., SouranderA., MørchW.T.The Strengths and Difficulties self-report questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2004; 13: 73–82.
55.
SpeltzM.L., EndrigaM.C., HillS., MarisC.L., JonesK., OmnellM.L.Cognitive and psychomotor development of infants with orofacial clefts. J Pediatr Psychol.2000; 25: 185–190.
56.
StockN.M., RumseyN.Parenting a child with a cleft: the father's perspective. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2015; 52: 31–43.
57.
Striegel-MooreR., FrankoD.Body image issues among girls and women. In: CashT.F., PruzinskyT., eds. Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research and Clinical Practice.New York: Guilford Press;2002.
58.
SwanenburgD.V., BeemerF.A., MellenberghG.J., WoltersW.H., Heineman-de BoerJ.A.(2003). An investigation of the relationship between associated congenital malformations and the mental and psychomotor development of children with clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2003; 40: 297–303.
59.
TambsK., MoumT.How well can a few questionnaire items indicate anxiety and depression?Acta Psychiatr Scand.1993; 87: 364–367.
60.
TiemensK., NicholasD., ForrestC.R.Living with difference: experience of adolescent girls with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.2013; 50: e27–e34.
61.
Van RoyB., GrøholtB., HeyerdahlS., Clench-AasJ.Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a large Norwegian population 10–19 years. Age- and gender-specific results of the extended SDQ-questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2006; 15: 189–198.
62.
Van RoyB., GrøholtB., HeyerdahlS., Clench-AasJ.Understanding discrepancies in parent-child reporting of emotional and behavioural problems: effects of relational and socio-demographic factors. BMC Psychiatry.2010; 10: 56.
63.
Van RoyB., VeenstraM., Clench-AasJ.Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry.2008; 49: 1304–1312.
64.
WichstrømL.Harter's Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents: Reliability, validity and evaluation of the question format. J Pers Assess.1995; 65: 100–116.
65.
WichstrømL.Self-concept development during adolescence. Do American truths hold for Norwegians? In: SkoeE, LippeA.V.D., ed. Personality Development in Adolescence. A Cross-National and Life Span Perspective.Routledge; 1998: 98–122.
