Opportunities and Challenges in Establishing a Cohort Study: An Example from Cleft Lip/Palate Research in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Background

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is one of the most common birth conditions in the world, but little is known about its causes. Professional opinion remains divided as to which treatments may be the most beneficial for patients with CL/P, and the factors that contribute to psychological adjustment are poorly understood. The use of different methodological approaches and tools plays a key role in hampering efforts to address discrepancies within the evidence base. A new UK-wide program of research, The Cleft Collective, was established to combat many of these methodological challenges and to address some of the key research questions important to all CL/P stakeholders.

Objective

To describe the establishment of CL/P cohort studies in the United Kingdom and to consider the many opportunities this resource will generate.

Results

To date, protocols have been developed and implemented within most UK cleft teams. Biological samples, environmental information, and data pertaining to parental psychological well-being and child development are being collected successfully. Recruitment is currently on track to meet the ambitious target of approximately 9800 individuals from just more than 3000 families.

Conclusions

The Cleft Collective cohort studies represent a significant step forward for research in the field of CL/P. The data collected will form a comprehensive resource of information about individuals with CL/P and their families. This resource will provide the basis for many future projects and collaborations, both in the United Kingdom and around the world.

Keywords

cause cleft cohort study environment gene measurement psychological adjustment treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beaty

T.H.

Murray

J.C.

Marazita

M.L.

Munger

R.G.

Ruczinski

Hetmanski

J.B.

Liang

K.Y.

Murray

Fallin

M.D.

. A genome-wide association study of cleft lip with and without cleft palate identifies risk variants near MAFB and ABCA4. Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 525–529.

Beaty

T.H.

Ruczinski

Murray

J.C.

Marazita

M.L.

Munger

R.G.

Hetmanski

J.B.

Murray

Redett

R.J.

Fallin

M.D.

Liang

K.Y.

. Evidence for gene-environment interaction in a genome-wide study of nonsyndromic cleft palate. Genet Epidemiol. 2011; 35: 469–478.

Birnbaum

Ludwig

K.U.

Reutter

Herms

Steffens

Rubini

Baluardo

Ferrian

Almedia de Assis

Alblas

M.A.

. Key susceptibility locus for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on chromosome 8q24. Nat Genet. 2009; 41: 473–477.

Danino

Gradell

Malka

Moutel

Herve

Rosilio

Social adjustment in French adults who had undergone standardised treatment of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005; 50: 202–205.

Dixon

M.J.

Marazita

M.L.

Beaty

T.H.

Murray

J.C.

Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12: 167–178.

Feragen

K.J.B.

Stock

N.M.

When there is more than a cleft: psychological adjustment when a cleft is associated with an additional condition. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014; 51: 5–14.

Feragen

K.J.B.

Stock

N.M.

Rumsey

Toward a reconsideration of inclusion and exclusion criteria in cleft lip and palate: implications for psychological research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014; 51: 569–578.

Grant

S.F.

Wang

Zhang

Glaberson

Annaiah

Kim

C.E.

Bradfield

J.P.

Glessner

J.T.

Thomas

K.A.

Garris

. A genome-wide association study identifies a locus for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on 8q24. J Pediatr. 2009; 155: 909–913.

Hearst

Can't they like me as I am? Psychological interventions for children and young people with congenital visible disfigurement. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007; 10: 105–112.

10.

Hunt

Burden

Hepper

Johnston

The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 274–285.

11.

Levin

K.A.

Study design III: cross-sectional studies. Evid Based Dent. 2006; 7: 24–25.

12.

Long

Jr Hathaway

Daskalogiannakis

Mercado

Russell

Cohen

Semb

Shaw

W.C.

The Americleft study: an intercentre study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48: 239–243.

13.

Ludwig

K.U.

Mangold

Herms

Nowak

Reutter

Paul

Becker

Herberz

Chawa

Nasser

. Genome-wide meta-analyses of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate identify six new loci. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 968–971.

14.

Mangold

Ludwig

K.U.

Birnbaum

Baluardo

Ferrian

Herms

Reutter

Almeida de Assis

N.A.

Chawa

T.A.

Mattheisen

. Genome-wide association study identifies two susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 24–26.

15.

Mossey

P.A.

Little

Munger

R.G.

Dixon

M.J.

Shaw

W.C.

Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009; 374: 1773–1785.

16.

Nelson

P.A.

Glenny

A-M

Kirk

Caress

A-L

. Parents' experiences of caring for a child with a cleft lip and/or palate: a review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2012; 38: 6–20.

17.

Noar

J.H.

Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 279–284.

18.

Norman

Persson

Stock

N.M.

Rumsey

Sandy

Waylen

Edwards

Hammond

Partridge

Ness

The effectiveness of psychosocial intervention for individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015; 52: 301–310.

19.

Persson

Becker

Svensson

Academic achievement in individuals with cleft: a population-based register study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012; 49: 153–159.

20.

Petit-Zeman

Cowan

Patients/carers and clinicians can set joint priorities for research in cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77: 309–310.

21.

Richman

L.C.

McCoy

T.E.

Conrad

A.L.

Nopoulos

P.C.

Neuropsychological, behavioral, and academic sequelae of cleft: early developmental, school age, and adolescent/young adult outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012; 49: 387–396.

22.

Rumsey

Stock

N.M.

Living with a cleft: psychological challenges, support and intervention. In: Berkowitz

, ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2013: 907–917.

23.

Sandy

Rumsey

Persson

Waylen

Kilpatrick

Ireland

Ness

Using service rationalisation to build a research network: lessons from the centralisation of UK services for children with cleft lip and palate. Br Dent J. 2012; 212: 553–555.

24.

Sandy

Williams

Mildinhall

Murphy

Bearn

Shaw

Sell

Devlin

Murray

The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) cleft lip and palate study. Br J Orthod. 1998; 25: 21–30.

25.

Shaw

W.C.

Semb

Nelson

Brattstrom

Molstead

Prahl-Andersen

Gundlach

K.K.

The Eurocleft project 1996-2000: overview. J Craniomaxilliofac Surg. 2001; 29: 131–140.

26.

Stanier

Moore

G.E.

Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13: 73–81.

27.

Stock

N.M.

Feragen

K.J.B.

Rumsey

Adults' narratives of growing up with a cleft lip and/or palate: factors associated with psychological distress and resilience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press-a.

28.

Stock

N.M.

Hammond

Owen

Kiff

Shanly

Rumsey

Achieving consensus in the measurement of psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press-b.

29.

Stock

N.M.

Rumsey

Starting a family: the experience of parents with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. In press.

30.

Stock

N.M.

Rumsey

Parenting a child with a cleft: the father's perspective. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015; 52: 31–13.

31.

Williams

Dures

Waylen

Ireland

Rumsey

Sandy

Approaching parents to take part in a cleft gene bank: a qualitative pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012; 49: 425–436.

32.

Liang

K.Y.

Hetmanski

J.B.

Ruczinski

Fallin

M.D.

Ingersoll

R.G.

Wang

Huang

Wu-Chou

Y.H.

. Evidence of gene-environment interaction for the IRF6 gene and maternal multivitamin supplementation in controlling the risk of cleft lip with/without cleft palate. Hum Genet. 2010; 128: 401–110.