Using an extra-oral approach, subperiosteal pockets were created bilaterally over zygomatic and mandibular areas in six Rhesus monkeys. One side of each anatomic site received a Proplast I implant and the contralateral a nonporous hydroxylapatite (NPHA) block. Two animals were killed postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the implants retrieved en bloc for histologic evaluation. Clinical evaluation showed the Proplast implants more stable than NPHA Implants. Histologic evaluation for Proplast implants demonstrated complete encapsulation, fibrous tissue infiltration, fragmentation of implants, and some giant cell reaction. The NPHA implants were completely encapsulated with fibrous tissues, and no giant cell response, fragmentation, biodegradation, or bone formation was observed. We concluded that the Proplast was more stable than NPHA implants, but the NPHA produced less inflammatory cell and giant cell reaction.
AremA.J., RasmussenD., MaddenJ.W. (1978). Soft tissue response to proplast: quantization of scar ingrowth.Plast Reconstr Surg61: 214–219.
2.
BauerM., HussiH., AnderiH., WilflingsederD. (1974). Grundsatze, Methoden und Resultate der Versorgung von Stirnbeindefekten.Chirurg45: 514–518.
3.
BrillW., KatthagenB.D. (1987). The interface between hydroxylapatite ceramic and newly formed bone in scanning electron microscopy.Z Orthop125: 183–187.
4.
DannJ.J., EpkerB.N. (1977). Proplast genioplasty: a retrospective study with treatment recommendations.Angle Orthod47: 173–185.
5.
DucheyneP., De MeesterP., AernoudtE., MartensM., MulierM. (1977). Influence of functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants.J Biomed Mater Res11: 811–838.
6.
DucheyneP., HenchL.L., KaganA., MartensM. (1980). Effect of hydroxylapatite impregnation on skeletal bonding of porous coated implants.J Biomed Mater Res14: 225–237.
7.
El DeebM., RoszkowskiM. (1988). Hydroxylapatite granules and blocks as an extracranial augmentation material in Rhesus monkeys.J Oral Maxillofac Surg46: 33–40.
8.
El DeebM., RoszkowskiM., El DeebE.M. (1987). Nonporous hydroxylapatite granules as an extracranial and extranasal augmentation material in dogs: technique and initial findings.Cleft Palate J24: 304–313.
9.
FreemanB.S. (1976). Proplast, a porous implant for contour restoration.Br J Plast Surg29: 158–164.
10.
GeesinkR.G., de GrootK., KleinC.P. (1988). Bonding of bone to apatite coated implants.J Bone Joint Surg70: 17–22.
11.
HalsteadA., JonesC.W., RawlingsR.D. (1979). A study of the reaction of human tissue to Proplast.J Biomed Mater Res13: 121–134.
12.
HolmesR.E., BucholzR.W., MooneyV. (1987). Porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in diaphyseal defects: a histometric study.J Orthop Res5: 114–121.
13.
HomsyC.A. (1970). Bio-compatibility in selection of materials for implantation.J Biomed Mater Res4: 341–356.
14.
HomsyC.A. (1973). Implant stabilization: chemical and biochemical considerations.Orthop Clin North Am4: 295–311.
15.
HomsyC.A., KentJ.N., HindsE.C. (1973). Materials for oral implantation-biological and functional criteria.J Am Dent Assoc86(4): 817–832.
16.
HulbertS.F., YoungF.A., MathewsR.S., KlawitterJ.J., TalbertC.D., SteelingF.H. (1970). Potential ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses.J Biomed Mater Res4: 433–456.
17.
JarchoM., KayJ.F., GumaerK.I., DoremusR.H., DrobeckH.P. (1977). Tissue, cellular and subcondylar events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface.J Bioeng1: 79–92.
18.
KatoK., AokiH., TabataT., OgisoM. (1979). Biocompatibility of apatite ceramics in mandibles.Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs7: 291–297.
KentJ.N., ZideM.F., KayJ.F., JarchoM. (1986). Hydroxylapatite blocks and particles as bone graft substitutes in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg44: 597–605.
21.
KlawitterJ.J. (1970). A basic investigation of bone growth into a porous ceramic material. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
22.
KorloF.B., NylenB., RitzK.A. (1973). Bone grafting of skull defects: a report of 55 cases.Plast Reconstr Surg52: 378–383.
23.
KuijpersW., GroteJ.J. (1977). The use of Proplast in experimental middle ear surgery.Clin Otolaryngol2: 5–15.
24.
MoosK.F., JacksonI.T., HendersonD., GibbsP.M. (1978). The use of proplast in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Br J Oral Surg16: 187–197.
25.
RadellB.L., CassinghamR.J. (1980). A clinical evaluation of proplast as a periodontal implant material.J Periodontol51: 110–115.
26.
RubinL.R., BrombergB.E., WaldenR.H. (1971). Long term reaction to synthetic plastics.Surg Gynecol Obstet132: 603–608.
SchultzR.C. (1981). Reconstruction of facial deformities with alloplastic material.Ann Plast Surg7: 434–446.
29.
SpectorM., DroughnR.A., SauerB.W., YoungJ. (1976). Effect of loading on the pore structure of low modulus porous implant materials.J Dent ResSS: B245.
30.
SpectorM., HarmonS.L., KreutnerA. (1979). Characteristics of tissue growth into Proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone.J Biomed Mater Res13: 677–692.
31.
TaylorS.R., GibbonsD.E. (1983). Effect of surface texture on the soft tissue response to polymer implants.J Biomed Mater Res17: 205–227.
32.
TessierP. (1971). The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis: Crouzon's and Apert's diseases.Plast Reconstr Surg48: 419–442.
33.
TessierP. (1982). Autogenous bone grafts taken from the calvarium for facial and cranial applications.Clin Plast Surg9: 531–538.
34.
TimmisD.P., AragonS.B., Van SickelsJ.E., AufdemorteT.B. (1986). Comparative study of alloplastic materials for temporomandibular joint disc replacement in rabbits.J Oral Maxillofac Surg44: 541–557.
35.
WaiteP.D., MatukasJ.V. (1986). Zygomatic augmentation with hydro xylapatite: a preliminary report.J Oral Maxillofac Surg44: 349–352.
36.
WhitakerL.A. (1987). Aesthetic augmentation of the mature midface structures.Plast Reconstr Surg80: 337–346.
37.
WolfordL.M., WardropR.W., HartogJ.M. (1987). Corraline porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg45: 1034–1042.
38.
ZideM.F. (1986). Late post-traumatic enophthalmos corrected by dense hydroxylapatite blocks.J Oral Maxillofac Surg44: 804–806.
39.
DielertE. (1988). Zur Eignung verschiedener Hydroxylapatitgranulate fur die restaurative Alveolarkammplastik. In; WatzekG., MatejkaM., eds. Der zahnlose Unterkiefer.Vienna: Springer, 188–198.
40.
GlowackiJ., JastyM., GoldringS. (1986). Comparison of multinucleated cells elicited in rats by particulate bone, polyethylene or polymethylacrylate.J Bone Miner Res1: 327–331.
41.
HärleF., KreuschT.H. (1987). Augmentation of the alveolar ridge with hydroxylapatite in a vicryl tube. Abstract, Second International Congress on Preprosthetic Surgery, May 14-16, Palm Springs Calif, 71.
