The wide spectrum of anomalies associated with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) has made systematic and inclusive classification difficult. We propose a nosologic system In which each letter of the acronym O.M.E.N.S. Indicates one of the five major manifestations of HFM. O for orbital distortion; M for mandibular hypoplasia; E for ear anomaly; N for nerve Involvement; and S for soft tissue deficiency. The O.M.E.N.S. system is easily adapted for data storage, retrieval, and statistical analysis. A retrospective study of 154 patients with HFM classified according to the O.M.E.N.S. system confirmed the concept that the mandibular deformity is the cornerstone of the anomaly. Statistical analysis demonstrated a positive association between mandibular hypoplasia and the severity of orbital, auricular, neural, and soft tissue involvement. This study did not confirm a previously reported predominance of gender or sidedness. Analysis of statistical correlations failed to substantiate a Goldenhar variant as a syndromic entity. Our analysis showed that palatal deviation is probably caused by muscular hypoplasia and not by weakness of a particular cranial nerve.
BennunR.D., MullikenJ.B., KabanL.B., MurrayJ.E. (1985). Microtia: a microform of hemifacial microsomia.Plast Reconstr Surg76: 859–863.
2.
ChiericiG. (1983). Radiologic assessment of facial symmetry. In: HarvoldE.P., VargervikK., ChiericiG., eds. Treatment of hemifacial microsomia.New York: Alan R. Liss,74–87.
3.
CoccaroP.J., BeckerM.H., ConverseJ.M. (1975). Clinical and radiographic variations in hemifacial microsomia.Birth Defects11(2): 314–324.
4.
CohenM.M.Jr.. (1982). The child with multiple birth defects.New York: Raven Press, 156–165.
FrançoisJ.J., HaustrateL. (1954). Anomalies colobomateuses du globe oculaire et syndrome du premier arc.Ann Occul187: 340–368.
12.
GnoinskiW. (1974). The morphology of otomandibular dysostosis and its consequence for therapy.Trans Europ Orthod Soc 50th Congress:7–84.
13.
GoldenharM. (1952). Associations malformatives de l'oeil et de l'oreille, en particulier le syndrome dermoïde epibulbaire-appendices auriculaires-fistula auris congenita et ses relations avec la dysostose mandibulo-faciale.J Génét Hum1: 243–282.
GorlinR.J., PindborgJ.J., CohenM.M.Jr.. (1976). Syndromes of the head and neck.New York: McGraw-Hill, 546–552.
16.
GrabbW.C. (1965). The first and second branchial arch syndrome.Plast Reconstr Surg36: 485–508.
17.
HarvoldE.P., VargervikK., ChiericiG. (1983). Treatment of hemifacial microsomia.New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.
18.
JohnstonM.C. (1990). Embryology of the head and neck. Vol. 4. In: McCarthyJ.G., ed. Plastic surgery.Philadelphia: WB Saunders,2451–2495.
19.
KabanL.B., MosesM.H., MullikenJ.B. (1988). Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child.Plast Reconstr Surg82: 9–19.
20.
KabanL.B., MullikenJ.B., MurrayJ.E. (1981). Three dimensional approach to analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia.Cleft Palate J18: 90–99.
21.
LauritzenC., MunroI.R., RossR.B. (1985). Classification and treatment of hemifacial microsomia.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg19: 33–39.
22.
LongacreJ.J., DestefanoG.A., HolmstrandK.E. (1963). The surgical management of first and second branchial arch syndromes.Plast Reconstr Surg31: 507–520.
MeurmanY. (1957). Congenital microtia and meatal atresia.Arch Otolaryngol66: 443–463.
27.
MullikenJ.B., KabanL.B. (1987). Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia in childhood.Clin Plast Surg14: 91–100.
28.
MurrayJ.E., KabanL.B., MullikenJ.B. (1984). Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia.Plast Reconstr Surg74: 186–199.
29.
PruzanskyS. (1969). Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike.Birth Defects1(2): 120–129.
30.
RollnickB.R., KayeC.I., NagatoskiK. (1987). Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia and variants: phenotypic characteristics of 194 patients.Am J Med Genet26: 361–375.
31.
RossR.B. (1975). Lateral facial dysplasia (first and second branchial arch syndrome: hemifacial microsomia).Birth Defects11(7): 51–59.
32.
ShprintzenR.J., CroftC.B., BerkmanM.D., RakoffS.J. (1980). Velopharyngeal insufficiency in the facio-auricu lo-vertebral malformation complex.Cleft Palate J17: 132–137.
33.
SprangerJ., BenirschkeK., HallJ.G., LenzW., LowryR.B., OptizJ.M., PinskyL., SchwarzaherH.G., SmithD.W. (1982). Errors of morphogenesis: concepts and terms.J Pediatr100: 160–165.
34.
StarkR.B., SaundersD.E. (1962). The first branchial syndrome. The oral-mandibular-auricular syndrome.Plast Reconstr Surg29: 229–329.
35.
SwansonL.T., MurrayJ.E. (1978). Asymmetries of the lower part of the face. In: WhitakerL.A., RandallP., eds. Symposium on reconstruction of jaw deformities. St.Louis: CV Mosby,171–196.
36.
TenconiR., HallB.D. (1983). Hemifacial microsomia: phenotypic classification, clinical implications, and genetic aspects. In: HarvoldE.P., VargervikK., ChiericiG., eds. Treatment of hemifacial microsomia.New York: Alan R. Liss,39–49.
GorlinR.J., PindborgJ. (1964). Syndromes of the head and neck.1st Ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
KayeC.I., RollnickB.R., PruzanskyS. (1979). Malformations of the auricle: isolated and in syndromes IV. Cumulative pedigree data.Birth Defects15(5C): 163–169.
41.
PruzanskyS. (1969). Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike.Birth Defects1(2): 120–129.
42.
RollnickB.R., Kayeci.. (1983). Hemifacial microsomia and variants: pedigree data.Am J Med Genet15: 233–253.
43.
RollnickB.R., KayeC.I., NagatoshiK., HauckW. Marin AO. (1987). Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia and variants: phenotypic characteristics of 294 patients.Am J Med Genet26: 361–375.
