This study examined the influence of familiarity and gender of raters on judgments of facial appearance for individuals with repaired cleft lip and palate. Forty professionals familiar with cleft lip and palate and forty individuals unfamiliar with the disorder were asked to examine photographs of 24 adolescents and rate them for facial appearance. The familiar Judges assigned more negative ratings of facial appearance than did the unfamiliar judges. In addition, males responded more negatively than did females. There was also a significant gender by familiarity interaction, with familiar males assigning more negative ratings of appearance than any other group.
BullR., RumseyN.. (1988). The social psychology of facial appearance.New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
MarshJ.L.. (1987). Assessment of appearance following craniofacial surgery in infancy. Paper presented at the American Cleft Palate Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas.
3.
MacgregorF.. (1974). Transformation and identity: the face and plastic surgery.New York: Quadrangle/New York Times Books.
4.
PatzerG.L.. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena.New York: Plenum Press.
5.
RichmanL.C.. (1978). The effects of facial disfigurement on teachers perceptions of ability in cleft palate children.Cleft Palate J, 15: 155–160.
6.
RichardsonS.A.. (1976). Attitudes and behavior towards the physically handicapped.Birth Defects (Original Article Series)12: 15–34.
7.
SchneidermanC.R., HardingJ.B.. (1984). Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers.Cleft Palate J, 21: 219–223.
8.
TobiasenJ.M.. (1987). Social judgments of facial deformity.Cleft Palate J24: 323–327.
9.
CliffordE.. (1988). The state of what art?Cleft Palate J25: 174–175.
10.
RouthD.K.. (1988), Handbook of pediatric psychology.New York: Guilford Press.
11.
TobiasenJ.M.. (1987). Social judgments of facial deformity.Cleft Palate J24: 323–327.
12.
World Health Organization (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps.Geneva: Author.
