Misarticulations produced by three patients with cleft palate (2 isolated cleft palate; 1 unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate) who attained adequate velopharyngeal function and normal palatal vault by early surgical repairs were examined using electropalatography (EPG) and sound spectrography (SG). Common characteristics of lingual-palatal contact in which the contact area was broader and/or was more posterior than normal were observed. These misarticulations can be divided into three types based on the direction of the breath emission: palatalized misarticulation (in which air passes along the midline of the palate), lateral misarticulation (in which air flows laterally through the occluded dental arch), and nasopharyngeal misarticulation (in which air flows out the nose). These three are considered to be similar to intractable posterior pattern of articulation in cleft palate patients previously reported. However, these types of misarticulations can be produced by cleft patients who have achieved adequate velopharyngeal function and normal palatal vault.
AbeM.. Pathophysiology of nasopharyngeal articulation: Sound analysis and observation of articulatory movement.Jpn J Logop Phoniatr1987; 28: 239–250. (Japanese)
4.
DaniloffR.G., WilcoxK., StephensM.I.. An acoustic-articulatory description of children's defective /s/ productions.J Commun Disord1980; 13: 347–363.
5.
EdwardsM.. Speech and language disability. In: EdwardsM., WatsonA.C.H.. eds. Advances in the management of cleft palate.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1980: 83–96.
6.
FantG.. Nasal sounds and nasalization. In: FantG., ed. Acoustic theory of speech production.The Hague: Mouton, 1970: 140–161.
7.
GibbonF., HardcastleW.. Deviant articulation in a cleft palate child following late repair of the hard palate: A description and remediation procedure using electropalatography (EPG).Clin Linguist Phonet1989; 3: 93–110.
8.
HardcastleW.J., Morgan BarryR.A., NunnM.. Instrumental articulatory phonetics in assessment and remediation: Case studies with the electropalatograph. In: StenglehoffenJ., ed. Cleft palate: the nature and remediation of communicative problems.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. 1989: 136–164.
9.
LawrenceC.W., PhilipsB.J.. A telefluoroscopic study of lingual contacts made by persons with palatal defects.Cleft Palate J1975; 12: 85–94.
10.
MatsuyaT., MiyazakiT., YamaokaM.. Fiberscopic examination of velopharyngeal closure in normal individuals.Cleft Palate J1974; 11: 286–291.
11.
MichiK.. Kohkuhshikkan niyoru gcngoshogai no shindan to chiryo ni kansuru rinshoteki kenkyu [Clinical studies of diagnosis and treatment of the speech disorders caused by oral diseases].J Jpn Stomatol Soc1986; 35: 1035–1076. (Japanese)
12.
MichiK., SuzukiN., YamashitaY., ImaiS.. Visual training and correction of articulation disorders by the use of dynamic palatography: Serial observation in a case of cleft palate.J Speech Hear Disord1986; 51: 226–238.
13.
MorleyM.. The assessment of speech. In: MorleyM., ed. Cleft palate and speech.7th Ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1970: 193–209.
14.
OkazakiK., OnizukaT., AbeM., SawashimaM.. Palatalized articulation as a type of cleft palate speech: observation by a dynamic palatograph and cineradiograph.Jpn J Logop Phoniatr1980; 21: 109–120. (Japanese)
15.
Peterson-FalzoneS.J., GrahamM.S.. Phoneme-specific nasal emission in children with and without physical anomalies of the velopharyngeal mechanism.J Speech Hear Disord1990; 55: 132–139.
16.
PowersM.H.. Functional disorders of articulation: Symptomology and etiology. In: TravisL.E., ed. Handbook of speech pathology and audiology.Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971: 843–844.
17.
SuzukiN.. Clinical application of EPG to Japanese cleft palate and glossectomy patients.Clin Linguist Phonet1989; 3: 127–136.
18.
SuzukiN., MichiK., TakahashiM., KatayoseK., YamashitaY., UenoT.. Study of the articulatory movement of the cleft palate subjects by use of dynamic palatography: an attempt to classify the palatogram pattern.J Jpn Cleft Palate Assoc1980; 5: 162–179. (Japanese)
19.
TakahashiK.. Acoustical evaluation of Japanese lateral misarticulation.J Jpn Cleft Palate Assoc1986; 11: 178–193. (Japanese)
20.
TrostJ.E.. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate.Cleft Palate J1981; 18: 193–203.
21.
YamashitaY., SuzukiN., MichiK., UenoT.. Lateral articulation in cleft palate: observation of the tongue movement by use of dynamic palatography.J Jpn Cleft Palate Assoc1981; 6: 8–29. (Japanese)
22.
WakumotoM.. Quantitive technique for evaluation of Japanese misarticulations: acoustical characteristics of Japanese palatalized articulation.J Jpn Cleft Palate Assoc1989; 14: 21–43. (Japanese)
23.
BloomerH.H.. A palatopograph for contour mapping of the palate.J Am Dent Assoc1943; 30: 1053–1057.
24.
DorfD., CurtinJ.. Early cleft palate repair and speech outcome.Plast Reconstr Surg1982; 70: 74–79.
25.
DryerT., TrierW.. A comparison of palatoplasty techniques.Cleft Palate J1984; 21: 251–253.
KuehnD., Trost-CardamoneJ.. Phonological development in children with cleft palate. Study session presented at the annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate Association, New York, 1986.
28.
MichiK., SuzukiN., YamashitaY., UenoT.. The visual training of articulation disorders by use of dynamic palatography — serial observation on a case of cleft palate. Fourth International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Acapulco, Mexico, 1981.
29.
MichiK., SuzukiN., YamashitaY., SatokoI.. Visual training and correction of articulation disorders by use of dynamic palatography: serial observation in a case of cleft palate.J Speech Hear Disord1986; 51: 226–238.
30.
MorrisH.L.. Future prospects: the outlook for speech. In: HuddartA.G.. FergusonM.J.W., eds. Cleft lip and palate: long-term results and future prospects. Vol. 2. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990: 292–296.
31.
MosesE.R.. A brief history of palatography.Q J Speech1940; 26: 615–625.
RohrichR.J., RoswellA.R., DruryM.. Timing of hard palate repair. The Oxford experience. Presented at 41st Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate Association, Seattle, 1984.
34.
RohrichR.J., ShewmakeK.B., JohnsD.F.. Optimal management of the cleft palate patient with plastic surgery/speech pathology interaction.Tejas1991; 17: 49–52.
35.
RouselotL.T.J.. Principes de phonetique experimental.Nouveau Ed. Paris: Libraire Universitaire, 1910.
SuzukiN., YamashitaY., MichiK., UenoT.. Changes of the palato-lingual contact during articulation therapy in the cleft palate patients. Observation by the use of dynamic palatography. Fourth International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Acapulco, Mexico, 1981.
38.
TrierW., DryerT.. Primary von Langenbeck palatoplasty with levator reconstruction: rationale and technique.Cleft Palate J1984; 24: 254–262.
39.
TrostJ.. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate.Cleft Palate J1981; 18: 193–203.
40.
Trost-CardamoneJ.. Effects of velopharyngeal incompetence on speech.J Child Comm Dis1986; 10: 31–49.
41.
WitzelM.A., VallinoL.D.. Speech problems in patients with dentofacial or craniofacial deformities. In: BellW.H., ed. Modern practice of Orthognathic and reconstructive surgery.Philadelphia: WB Saunders, In press.
