Orthopedic Protraction of the Upper Jaw in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients during the Deciduous and Mixed Dentition Periods in Comparison with Normal Growth and Development
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 1993
Orthopedic Protraction of the Upper Jaw in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients during the Deciduous and Mixed Dentition Periods in Comparison with Normal Growth and Development
Cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients often develop maxillary retrusion after cleft repair. Since 1977, a group of 98 cases with negative overjet (anterior crossbite) during the period of deciduous dentition has been treated by the Bergen CLP team. The purpose of treatment has been to achieve favorable occlusion with positive overjet and overbite by means of anterior orthopedic traction (protraction). The average age at start of treatment was 6 years 11 months, and mean treatment duration was 13 months. The protraction force was 700 g. The serial lateral cephalograms of the treated CLP group were compared with those of a noncleft group with normal growth. Normalization of the sagittal maxillomandibular relationship (ANB angle) was achieved. Significant changes were a more anterior position of the upper jaw, and a more posterior position of the lower jaw, due to mandibular clockwise rotation. The variation was considerable. This paper reports the overall changes in the whole CLP group (ALL-C group).
ÅbyholmF.E.. Cleft lip and palate in a Norwegian population. II. A numerical study of 1555 CLP-patients admitted for surgical treatment 1954–75.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg1978; 12: 35–43.
2.
BerglandO.. Changes in cleft palate malocclusion after the introduction of improved surgery.Trans Eur J Orthod Soc1967; 43: 383–398.
3.
BerglandO., SidhuS.S.. Occlusal changes from the deciduous to the early mixed dentition in unilateral complete clefts.Cleft Palate J1974; 11: 317–326.
4.
BjörkA.. The face in profile.Thesis. Svensk Tandllök Tidsk1947; 40(Suppl 5b).
5.
CampbellP.M.. The dilemma of Class III treatment: early or late?Angle Orthod1983; 53: 175–191.
6.
ChatkuptS.. Craniofacial and dental morphology of six-year-old Norwegian children with isolated cleft palate. Thesis. Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, University of Bergen, 1982.
7.
DahlE., HanusardottirB.. Prevalence of malocclusion in the primary and mixed dentition in Danish children with incomplete cleft lip and palate.Eur J Orthod1979; 1: 81–88.
8.
DelaireJ.. Considérations sur la croissance faciale (en particulier du maxillaire supérieur).Déductions thérapeutiques. Rev Stomatol1971a; 72: 57–76.
9.
DelaireJ.. Confection du masque orthopédique.Rev Stomatol1971b; 72: 572–584.
10.
DelaireJ., VerdonP., FlourJ.. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen extraoraler Kräfte in postero-anteriorer Richtung unter Verwendung der orthopädischen Maske.Fortschr Kieferorthop1978; 39: 27–45.
11.
DelaireJ., VerdonP., FlourJ.. Ziele und Ergebnisse extraoraler Züge in postero-anteriorer Richtung in Anwendung einer orthopädischen Maske bei der Behandlung von Fällen der Klasse III.Fortschr Kieferorthop1976; 37: 247–262.
12.
DelaireJ., VerdonP., KénésiM.C.. Extraorale Zugkräfte mit Stirn-Kinn-Abstützung zur Behandlung der Oberkieferdeformierungen als Folge von Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten.Fortschr Kieferorthop1973; 34: 225–237.
13.
DelaireJ., VerdonP., LumineauJ-P, Cherga-négréaA., TalmantJ., BoissonM.. Quelques résultats des tractions extra-orales à appui frontomentonnier dans le traitement orthopédique des malformations maxillo-mandibulaires de classe III et des séquelles osseuses des fentes labio-maxillaires.Rev Stomatol1972; 73: 633–642.
14.
DixonW.J.. BMDP statistical software.Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1983.
15.
FränkelR.. Maxillary retrusion in Class III and treatment with the Function Corrector III.Trans Eur Orthod Soc1970; 46: 249–259.
16.
GjerdetN.R.. KEFALO. Datasystem for behandling av kefalometriske målinger. Brukerveiledning og programdokumentasjon. Department of Dental Materials, University of Bergen, Norway, 1983.
17.
GraberT.M.. Dentofacial orthopedics. In: GraberT.M., SwainB.F., eds. Current orthodontic concepts and techniques. 2nd Ed. Vol. 1.Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1975: 365–452.
18.
GuyerE.C., EllisE.E., McNamaraJ.A., BehrentsR.G.. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.Angle Orthod1986; 56: 7–30.
HoustonW.J.B.. A comparison of the reliability of measurements of cephalometric radiographs by tracings and direct digitization.Swed Dent J Suppl1982; 15: 99–103.
22.
HoustonW.J.B.. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.Am J Orthod1983; 83: 382–390.
23.
IrieM., NakamuraS.. Orthodontic approach to severe skeletal Class III malocclusion.Am J Orthod1975; 67: 377–392.
24.
IshiiH., MoritaS., TakeuchiY., NakamuraS.. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1987; 92: 304–312.
KambaraT.. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca iras.Am J Orthod1977; 71: 249–277.
27.
KettleM.A., BurnappD.R.. Occipito-mental anchorage in the orthodontic treatment of dental deformities due to cleft lip and palate.Br Dent J1955; 99: 11–14.
28.
LarssonK.. An evaluation of the precision of computeraided digitization of lateral cephalograms. Thesis. Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, University of Bergen, 1985.
29.
McWilliamJ.S.. PCDIG. A program for digitizing two dimensional images.Center for Dental Technology and Biomaterials, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 1988.
30.
MelsenB., MelsenF.. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material.Am J Orthod1982; 82: 329–342.
31.
MermigosJ., FullC.A., AndreasenG.. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1990; 98: 47–55.
32.
MillardD.R.Jr, LathamR.A.. Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts.Plast Reconstr Surg1990; 86: 856–871.
33.
NandaR.. Protraction of maxilla in rhesus monkeys by controlled extraoral forces.Am J Orthod1978; 74: 121–141.
34.
NandaR.. Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear.Am J Orthod1980; 78: 125–139.
35.
OppenheimA.. A possibility for physiologic orthodontic movement.Am J Orthod1944; 30: 345–368.
36.
PetrikL.. Die Kinnkappe. In: AndresenV., HäuplK., PetrikL., eds. Funktionskieferortopädie.Munchen: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1957: 154–158.
37.
PotpeschniggDr. Eine Zahnrichtsmaschine.Leipzig: Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Zahnheilkunde, 1875. XV Jahrgang: 34–36.
38.
PruzanskyS., AdussH.. Prevalence of arch collapse and malocclusion in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.Eur Orthod Soc Rep1967; 43: 365–382.
39.
RantaR., OikariT., HaatajaJ.. Prevalence of crossbite in deciduous and mixed dentition in Finnish children with operated cleft palate.Proc Finn Dent Soc1974; 70: 20–24.
40.
RantaR.. Protraction of the cleft maxilla.Eur J Orthod1988; 10: 215–222.
41.
Rudzki-JansonI.. Primäre und sekundäre Kieferorthopädie bei Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten.Der Kinderarzt1991; 22: 263–270.
42.
RuhlandA.. The correlation between Angle Class III malocclusion and facial structures as diagnostic factors.Eur Orthod Soc Trans1975: 229–240.
43.
RyohP.. Nye metoder i behandling av pasienter med leppe-, kjeve-, ganespalter (LKG).Nor Tannlegeforen Tid1990; 100: 377–381.
44.
RyohP., TindlundR.S.. Orthopedic expansion and protraction of the maxilla in cleft palate patients—A new treatment rationale.Cleft Palate J1982; 19: 104–112.
45.
SakamotoT.. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal Class III malocclusion.Am J Orthod1981; 80: 411–416.
46.
SarnäsK-V, RuneB.. Extraoral traction to the maxilla with the face mask: a follow-up of 17 consecutively treated patients with and without cleft lip and palate.Cleft Palate J1987; 24: 95–103.
47.
SchjelderupH., JohnsonG.E.. A six-year follow-up study of 155 children with cleft lip and palate.Br J Plast Surg1983; 36: 154–161.
48.
SckulhofR.J., NakamuraS., WilliamsonW.V.. Prediction of abnormal growth in Class III malocclusions.Am J Orthod1977; 71: 421–430.
49.
SembG.. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1991; 28: 1–21.
50.
ShawW.C.. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusions associated with repaired complete clefts of lip and palate.Br J Orthod1979; 6: 73–83.
51.
ShawW.C., SembG.. Strategies for the study of treatment outcome in CLP. The scope and limitations of contemporary designs. Jerusalem: 6th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, 1989.
52.
ShprintzenR.J.. Directions of future clinical research. Panel. Jerusalem: 6th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, 1989.
53.
SirinavinI.. Cranio-facial and dental morphology of six-year-old Norwegian boys with complete cleft lip and palate. Thesis. Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, University of Bergen, 1980.
54.
SkoogT.. The use of periosteal flaps in the repair of clefts of the primary palate.Cleft Palate J1965; 2: 332–339.
55.
SolowB.. Automatic processing of growth data.Angle Orthod1969; 39: 186–197.
56.
StenslandA., WisthP.J., BøeO.E.. Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by combined orthodontic and orthopedic approach.Eur J Orthod1988; 10: 39–51.
TindlundR.S.. Behandling av leppe/kjeve/ganespalte i Bergen — Teamwork.Nor Tannlegeforen Tid1987: 97: 360–369.
59.
TindlundR.S.. Orthopaedic protraction of the midface in the deciduous dentition—Results covering 3 years out of treatment.J Craniomaxillofac Surg1989; 17(Suppl 1): 17–19.
60.
TindlundR.S., RyghP., BøeO.E.. Intercanine widening and sagittal effect of maxillary transverse expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate during the deciduous and mixed dentitions.Cleft Palate Craniofac J1993; 30: 195–207.
61.
TweedC.H.. Clinical orthodontics. Vol 2. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1966.
62.
VegoL.. Early orthopedic treatment for Class III skeletal patterns.Am J Orthod1976; 70: 59–69.
63.
WisthP.J., TritrapuntA., RyghP., BøeO.E., NordervalK.. The effect of maxillary protraction on front occlusion and facial morphology.Acta Odontol Scand1987; 45: 227–237.
64.
ØdegaardJ.. The skeletal profile of Norwegian children from age 4 to 10 years. A methodological and roentgen anatomical study of the sagittal growth. Thesis. Department of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics, University of Bergen, 1970.
