Twenty-three mothers and their 5- to 7-year-old children with craniofacial anomalies (CFA) who were assessed during the child's infancy were followed. Three types of CFA were Included: cleft lip and palate (CLP), isolated cleft palate (CP), and sagittal synostosis. Measures of child status focused on behavior-problem frequency and self-concept. Mothers completed self-report measures of emotional well-being, marital satisfaction, and social support. Results Indicated that (1) a sizable minority (18%) of the children with CFA had clinically significant behavior-problem scores shown in concordant reports by parent and teacher of behavior problems; (2) Individual differences In child functioning within the CFA group were predicted by observational measures of earlier mother-Infant interaction during play and teaching situations; (3) mothers of children with CLP reported less favorable social support than mothers of children with CP or sagittal synostosis.
AchenbachT.M.. Manual for the child behavior checklist and 1991 profile.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991a.
2.
AchenbachT.M.. Manual for the teacher's report form and 1991 profile.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991b.
3.
AchenbachT.M., EdelbrockC.S.. Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile.Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry,1981.
4.
AllenR., WassermanG.A., SeidmanS.. Children with congenital anomalies: the preschool period.J Pediatr Psychol1990; 15: 327–345.
5.
ArgonaJ.A., EybergS.M.. Neglected children: mother's report of child behavior problems and observed verbal behavior.Child Dev1981; 52: 596–602.
6.
BarnardK., HammondM.A., BoothC.L., BeeH.L., MitchellS.K., SpiekerS.J.. Measurement and meaning of parent-child interaction. In: MorrisonF., LordC., KeatingD., eds. Applied developmental psychology, Vol. 3.San Diego: Academic Press,1989.
7.
BensonB.A., GrossA.M., MesserS.C., KellumG., PassmoreL.A.. Social support networks among families of children with craniofacial anomalies.Health Psychol1991; 10: 252–258.
8.
BroderH., StraussR.P.. Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects.Cleft Palate J1989; 26: 114–117.
9.
DupuyH.J.. A brief description of the research edition of the general psychological well-being schedule (GWBS).Fairfax, Virginia: National Center for Health Statistics,1979.
10.
EderR.A.. Uncovering young children's psychological selves: individual and developmental differences.Child Dev1990; 61: 849–863.
11.
EybergS.M., RobinsonE.A.. Parent-child interaction training: effects on family functioning.J Clin Child Psychol1982; 11: 130–137.
12.
GreenbergM.T., SpeltzM.L., DeKlyenM.. The role of attachment in the development of disruptive behavior disorders.Dev Psychopathol1993; 5: 191–213.
13.
GoldbergS., BrachfeldS., DivittoB.. Feeding, fussing, and play: parent-infant interaction in the first year as a function of pre-maturity and perinatal medical problems. In: FieldT.M., GoldbergS., SternD., SostekM., eds. High-risk infants and children: adult and peer interactions.New York: Academic Press.
14.
HarperD., RichmanL., SniderB.. School adjustment and degree of physical impairment.J Pediatr Psychol1980; 5: 377–383.
15.
KappK.. Self-concept of the cleft lip or palate child.Cleft Palate J1979; 16: 171–176.
16.
Kapp-SimonK.. Self-concept of primary school-age children with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both.Cleft Palate J1986; 23: 24–27.
17.
Kapp-SimonK., SimonD., KristovichS.. Self-perception, social skills, adjustment, and inhibition in young adolescents with craniofacial anomalies.Cleft Palate J1992; 29: 352–356.
18.
KazakA., ParkesL.. Reliability and validity data for a social network assessment technique. Unpublished manuscript, 1987.
19.
KazakA.E., ReberM., CarterA.. Structural and qualitative aspects of social networks in families with young chronically ill children.J Pediatr Psychol1988; 13: 171–182.
20.
LeonardB.J., BoustJ.D., AbrahamsG., SielaffB.. Self-concept of children with cleft lip and/or palate.Cleft Palate J1991; 28: 347–353.
21.
McConaughyS.H., StangerC., AchenbachT.M.. Three year course of behavioral/emotional problems in a national sample of 4- to 16-year-olds: I.Agreement among informants. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1992; 31: 932–940.
22.
RichmanL.C.. Behavior and achievement of cleft palate children.Cleft Palate J1976; 13: 4–10.
23.
RobinsonE.A., EybergS.M.. The dyadic parent-child interaction coding system: standardization and validation.J Consult Clin Psychol1981; 49: 245–250.
24.
SpanierG.B.. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.J Marriage Family1976; 38: 15–28.
25.
SpeltzM.L., ArmsdbnG., ClarrenS.. Effects of craniofacial birth defects on maternal functioning post-infancy.J Pediatr Psychol1990; 15: 177–196.
26.
SpeltzM.L., EndrigaM., WilsonK., ClarrenS.K.. Effects during infancy of cleft lip and/or palate on maternal and family psychosocial status. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, May 12, Portland, Oregon, 1992.
27.
TabachnickB.G., FidellL.S.. Using multivariate statistics.New York: Harper and Row,1983.
28.
TobiasenJ.M., PerkinsA., WeaverS.J., HiebertM.D.. Incidence of psychological adjustment problems in children with cleft lip and palate. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, May 12, Portland, Oregon, 1992.
29.
Webster-StrattonC.. Mother perceptions and mother-child interactions: comparison of a clinic-referred and a nonclinic group.J Clin Child Psychol1985; 14: 334–339.
