A Multicenter Retrospective 3D Study of Serial Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Casts to Evaluate Treatment: Part 1—The Participating Institutions and Research Aims

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the multicenter retrospective and prospective spaciotemporal (4D) serial analyses of complete unilateral (CUCLP) and complete bilateral (CBCLP) cleft lip and palate casts that had undergone different treatment procedures. The involved institutions are Miami Craniofacial Anomalies Foundation, South Florida Cleft Palate Clinic; University Hospital of Nijmegen Cleft Palate Center; Free University of Amsterdam Cleft Palate Center; Academic Hospital (Dijkzigt/Sophia) Rotterdam Cleft Palate Center; Center for Craniofacial Anomalies, University of Illinois College of Medicine; Cleft Palate Center, Sahigrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden; and Children's Memorial Medical Center, Northwestern University Cleft Palate Institute.

Design:

Using serial casts of the upper jaw and an electromechanical digitizer with special CadCam software (CadKey), the occlusal relationships and morphometric palatal growth changes that occur under the influence of presurgical orthopedics and various surgical procedures will be studied. It is anticipated that 3D geometric data extracted from serial casts will identify the important geometric palatal parameters present before cleft surgical closure, which will supply objective criteria for establishing a scientific basis for improved surgical therapy.

This research study will test three hypotheses: (1) Conservative (varying the timing of surgical cleft closure according to the size of the cleft space) lip and palatal surgery will permit “catch-up” palatal growth and normalize palatal growth and development. (2) The amount of mucoperiosteal tissue relative to the size of the cleft space is important in determining the timing of palatal surgery, as it influences the degree of scarring and ultimately the palate's adult size and form. (3) Presurgical orthopedics (the use of appliances soon after birth) can stimulate palatal growth beyond its normal growth potential.

Results:

In a previous project and again after reviewing the data already collected during the first year of this study, it has been shown that incremental changes in size of palatal segments in CUCLP and CBCLP cases prior to surgery vary slightly. The CBCLP cases grow slightly faster than CUCLP cases before surgery, but growth of the CBCLP cases decreases in acceleration after surgery. Reasons for these differences will be determined when more cases are analyzed and subjected to biostatistical analysis.

Keywords

cleft palate electromechanical digitizer spaciotemporal (4D)palatal surgery cleft space multicenter study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz

A comparison of treatment results in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate using conservative approach versus Millard-Latham PSOT technique. In: Sadowsky

P.L.

, ed. Seminars. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: 1996a: 169–184.

Berkowitz

Cleft Lip and Palate and Other Craniofacial Anomalies. San Diego: Singular Press; 1996b.

Berkowitz

Cleft lip and palate. In: Wolfe

S.A.

Berkowitz

eds. Plastic Surgery of the Facial Skeleton. Boston: Little Brown: 1989: 291–416.

Berkowitz

Kricher

Pruzansky

Quantitative analysis of cleft palate casts, Cleft Palate J. 1974; 11: 134–161.

Berkowitz

Timing cleft palate closure-age should not be the sole determinant.

J Craniofac Genet Devel Biol Suppl. 1985; 1: 69–83.

Blocksma

Leuz

C.A.

Mellerstag K. A constructive program for managing cleft palates without the use of mucoperiostal flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55: 160–169.

Dingman

R.O.

Grabb

W.C.

A rational program for surgical management of bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Plast Reconstr Sarg. 1971; 46: 239.

Dingman

R.O.

O'Connor

J.E.

A conservative program of surgical management of the cleft lip and cleft palate patient. Presented at the Second International Congress on Cleft Palates; August 26, 1973; Copenhagen, Denmark.

Dorf

D.S.

Curtin

J.W.

Early cleft palate repair and speech outcome.

Plast Reconst Sura. 1982; 70: 174–179.

10.

Friede

Johanson

Adolescent facial morphology of early bone-grafted cleft lip and palate patients.

Scand J Plast Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 16: 41–53.

11.

Graber

T.M.

Craniofacial morphology in cleft palate and lip deformities.

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949; 88: 359.

12.

Graber

T.M.

The congenital cleft palate deformity.

J Am Dent Assoc. 1954; 48: 375–395.

13.

Holdsworth

W.G.

Early treatment of the cleft lip and palate.

BMJ. 1954; 1: 304.

14.

Hosmer

Lemeshow

Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.

15.

Hotz

Gnoinski

Perko

Nussbaumer

Hof

Haubensak

, The Zurich approach 1964 to 1984. In: Gnoinski

ed. Early Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate. Berne: Hans Huber: 1984.

16.

Hotz

Gnoinski

Comprehensive care of cleft lip and cleft palate children at Zurich University: a preliminary report.

Am J Orthod. 1976; 70: 481–504.

17.

Hotz

, The indications for preoperative and postoperative orthopedic treatment of cleft up and palate. In: Hotz

, ed. Early Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate. Berne: Hans Huber; 1964a: 78–89.

18.

Hughes

P.C.R.

Morphometric studies of catch-up-growth in the rat. In: Dixon

A.D.

Sarnat

B.G.

, ed. Factors and Mechanisms Influencing Bone Growth. New York: Alan R. Liss Inc; 1982: 433–446.

19.

Jolleys

A review of the results of operations on cleft palates with references to maxillary growth and speech function.

Br J Plast Surg. 1954; 7: 229.

20.

Kernaham

D.A.

Sequence of procedures and timing. In: Kernaham

D.A.

Rosenstein

S.W.

Cleft Lip and Palate: A System of Management. Baltimore: William & Wilkens: 1990: 15.

21.

Kowalski

C.J.

Schneiderman

E.D.

Willis

S.M.

PC program for assessing the effects of a treatment when subjects are growing: the randomized parallel groups design.

Int J Biomed Comput 1994a; 37: 83–91.

22.

Kowalski

C.J.

Sehneiderman

E.D.

Willis

S.M.

PC program implementing and alternative to the paired-test which adjusts for regression to the mean.

Int J Biomed Comput. 1994b; 37: 189–194.

23.

Millard

D.R.

Cleft Craft the Evolution of Its Surgery, Part I: The Unilateral Deformity. Boston: Little Brown; 1976.

24.

Millard

D.R.

Cleft Craft the Evolution of Its Surgery. Part II: Bilateral and Rare Deformity. Boston: Little Brown; 1977a.

25.

Millard

D.R.

Cleft Craft the Evolution of Its Surgery, Part III: Alveolar and Palatal Deformity, Boston: Little Brown; 1977b.

26.

Neter

Wasserman

Kutner

M.H.

Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, IL: Irwin; 1985.

27.

Prahl-Anderson

Behandeling van de schisispatient, Het Tanheelkundig Jaar 1985. W, A. M. van der Kwaet e. a. (red). Utrecht/Antwerpen; 1985: 133–155.

28.

Robertson

N.R.E.

Jolleys

The timing of hard palate repair.

Scand J Plast Reconst Surg. 1974; 8: 49.

29.

Schweckendieck

Primary alveoloplasty: long term results without maxillary deformity: a twenty-five year report.

Cleft Palate J. 1978; 15: 268–274.

30.

Semb

A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team.

Cleft Palate J. 1991; 28: 1–21.

31.

Shaw

W.C.

Semb

Current approaches to the orthodontic management of cleft lip and palate.

J R Soc Med 1990; 83: 30–33.

32.

Slaughter

Pruzansky

The rationale for velar closure as a primary procedure in the repair of cleft palate defects, Plast Reconstr Surg. 1954; 13: 341–357.

33.

Slaughter

Pruzansky

Harris

H.L.

Berger

A new surgical concept for repair of congenital clefts of lip and palate.

Surg Clin North Am. 1958: 945–958.

34.

Weil

Orthopaedic growth guidance and stimulation for patients with cleft lip and palate.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 21: 57–64.

35.

Wilson

P.N.

Osbourn

D.F.

Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds, Bio Rev. 1960; 35: 324–363.