Comparative Evaluation of the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Individuals with Noncleft Individuals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2017
Comparative Evaluation of the Pharyngeal Airway Space in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Individuals with Noncleft Individuals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
To evaluate the pharyngeal airway space changes in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) individuals, and compare with age and sex-matched noncleft (NC) control subjects.
Design
Retrospective study.
Setting
Cleft and Craniofacial Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Materials and Methods
Twenty UCLP (mean age: 13.4 ± 0.5 years), 18 BCLP (mean age: 13.5 ± 0.5 years) and 20 skeletal Class I subjects (mean age: 13.4 ± 0.6 years) were included in the study. Cone beam computed tomography scans were assessed for pharyngeal airway space (PAS) (oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, total airway space volume), and compared with PAS of age and sex-matched skeletal Class I NC individuals.
Results
Pharyngeal airway space showed statistically significant differences in the UCLP, BCLP, and NC control subjects. Oropharyngeal (9338 ± 1108 mm3, P < .05), nasopharyngeal (2911 ± 401 mm3, P < .05), and total airway space (12 250 ± 1185 mm3, P < .05) volumes of BCLP individuals showed significant reduction in comparison to UCLP and NC. There were no gender differences of PAS in any of the groups tested (P > .05).
Conclusion
The pharyngeal airway space was significantly reduced in the BCLP group than were those in UCLP and control groups. This reduced PAS should be taken into account when planning treatment for these individuals.
AboudaraC, NeilsenI, HuangJC, MakiK, MillerAJ, HatcherD.Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 468–479.
2.
AbramsonZ, SusarlaS, TroulisM, KabanL.Age-related changes of the upper airway assessed by 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20 (Suppl 1): 657–663.
3.
ArasI, OlmezS, DoganS.Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal airways of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using three-dimensional and two-dimensional methods. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012; 49: e75–e81.
4.
CelikogluM, UcarFI, SekerciAE, BuyukSK, ErsozM, SismanY.Assessment of pharyngeal airway volume in adolescent patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84: 995–1001.
5.
CheungT, OberoiS.Three dimensional assessment of the pharyngeal airway in individuals with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e43405.
6.
ChiangCC, JeffresMN, MillerA, HatcherDC. Three-dimensional airway evaluation in 387 subjects from one university orthodontic clinic using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 985–992.
7.
DahlE, KreiborgS, JensenBL, FoghAndersenP.Comparison of craniofacial morphology in infants with incomplete cleft lip and isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1982; 19: 258–266.
8.
DiwakarR, SidhuMS, JainS, GroverS, PrabhakarM.Three-dimensional evaluation of pharyngeal airway in complete unilateral cleft individuals and normally growing individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015; 52: 346–351.
9.
DrakeAF, DavisJU, WarrenDW. Nasal airway size in cleft and noncleft children. Laryngoscope. 1993; 103: 915–917.
10.
DrettnerB.The nasal airway and hearing in patients with cleft palate. Acta Otolaryngol. 1960; 57: 131–142.
11.
ElH, PalomoJM. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139: e511–e521.
12.
FriedeH, JohansonB.A follow-up study of cleft children treated with vomer flap as part of a three-stage soft tissue surgical procedure: facial morphology and dental occlusion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977; 11: 45–57.
13.
FoukeJM, StrohlKP. Effect of position and lung volume on upper airway geometry. J Appl Physiol. 1987; 63: 375–380.
14.
GrauerD, CevidanesLS, StynerMA, AckermanJL, ProffitWR. Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: relationship to facial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 805–814.
15.
HairfieldWM, WarrenDW. Dimensions of the cleft nasal airway in adults: a comparison with subjects without cleft. Cleft Palate J. 1989; 26: 9–13.
16.
HairfieldWM, WarrenDW, SeatonDL. Prevalence of mouth breathing in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25: 135–138.
17.
ImamuraN, OnoT, HiyamaS, IshiwataY, KurodaT.Comparison of the sizes of adenoidal tissues and upper airways of subjects with and without cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 189–194.
18.
JohnsonGP. Craniofacial analysis of patients with complete clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1980; 17: 17–23.
19.
MarcusCL. Clinical and pathophysiological aspects of obstructive sleep apnea in children. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl. 1997; 16: 123–124.
20.
OosterkampBCM, RemmelinkHJ, PruimGJ, HoekemaA, DijkstraPU. Craniofacial, craniocervical, and pharyngeal morphology in bilateral cleft lip and palate and obstructive sleep apnea patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007; 44: 1–7.
21.
PaeEK, LoweAA, SasakiK, PriceC, TsuchiyaM, FleethamJA. A cephalometric and electromyographic study of upper airway structures in the upright and supine positions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106: 52–59.
22.
PimentaLA, BarbosaGLDR, PrettiH, EmodiO, AalstJV, RossowPE, TyndallDA, DrakeAF. Three-dimensional evaluation of nasopharyngeal airways of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 736–739.
23.
RonenO, MalhotraA, PillarG.Influence of gender and age on upper-airway length during development. Pediatrics. 2007; 120: 1028–1034.
RossRB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24: 5–77.
26.
SembG.A study of facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28: 22–39.
27.
VargervikK.Growth characteristics of the premaxilla and orthodontic treatment principles in bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1983; 20: 289–302.
28.
WarrenDW, DavisJ, DrakeA, DalstonE.The nasal airway in BCLP: a pattern of abnormal development?J Dent Res. 1992a; 71: 746.
29.
WarrenDW, HairfieldWM, DalstonET, SidmanJD, PillsburyHC. Effects of cleft lip and palate on the nasal airway in children. ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988; 114: 987–992.
30.
WilliamsAC, SandyJR. Risk factors for poor dental arch relationships in young children born with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 586–593.
31.
XuY, ZhaoS, ShiJ, WangY, ShiB, ZhengQ, LouLJ. 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the pharynx in adult patients with unrepaired isolated cleft palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 71: 1424–1434.
32.
YoshiharaM, TerajimaM, YanagitaN, . Three-dimensional analysis of the pharyngeal airway morphology in growing Japanese girls with and without cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141: S92–S101.
