Children of color are especially vulnerable for a devastating outcome as a result of their living environment and are disproportionately represented within the child welfare system. Social workers, who are trained to mitigate the effects of social injustice and societal inconsistencies, particularly among minorities and oppressed populations, perpetuate the injustices associated with the child welfare system by ignoring the special needs of children of color when administering family preservation services. The authors present results from a national study that examined the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of family preservation workers regarding the service criterion based on whether a family is part of a special population. Results indicate a significant bias against targeting family preservation services to children of color.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BillingsleyA. (1968). Black families in White America.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Child Welfare League of America. (1981). Directory of associate agencies.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Children's Defense Fund. (1995). The state of America's children yearbook 1995.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
CloseM. (1983). Child welfare and people of color: Denial of equal access. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 19(4), 13–20.
5.
DayD. (1979). The adoption of Black children.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
DenbyR. W., & AlfordK. A. (1995, October 12–15). Special populations and family preservation: Strengthening our commitment and meeting needs. Paper presented at the National Association of Social Workers Meeting of the Profession, Philadelphia.
7.
DillmanD. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method.New York: John Wiley.
8.
DodsonJ. E. (1983). An Afro-centric manual: Toward a nondeficit perspective in services to families and children.Office of Continuing Education, College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
9.
FeldmanL. (1990). Target population definition. In YuanY., & RivestM. (Eds.), Preserving families (pp. 16–38). New-bury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
FongR. (1994). Family preservation: Making it work for Asians. Child Welfare, 73, 331–341.
11.
GrayS. S., & NybellL. M. (1990). Issues in African American family preservation. Child Welfare, 69, 513–523.
12.
GustavassonN. S., & SegalE. A. (1994). Critical issues in child welfare.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
HendersonL. J. (1994). African Americans in the urban milieu: Conditions, trends, and development needs. In TidwellB. J. (Ed.), The state of Black America: 1994.New York: The National Urban League.
14.
HeneghanA. M., HorwitzS. M., & LeventhalH. M. (1996). Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: A methodologic review. Unpublished manuscript, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
15.
HenensonM. E., MorrisL. L., & Fitz-GibbonD. T. (1987). How to measure attitudes.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
HodgesV. G. (1991). Providing culturally sensitive intensive family preservation services to ethnic minority families. In TracyE. M., HaapalaD. A., KinneyJ., & PecoraP. J. (Eds.), Intensive family preservation services: An instructional sourcebook (pp. 95–116). Cleveland, OH: Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University.
17.
HowardM. (1984). Transracial adoption: Analysis of the best interests standard. Notre Dame Law Review, 59, 503–555.
18.
JenkinsS., & SauberM. (1966). Paths to child placement: Family situations prior to foster care.New York: Community Council of Greater New York.
19.
JonesM., NewmanR., & ShuneA. W. (1976). A second chance for families: Evaluation of a program to reduce foster care.New York: Child Welfare League of America.
20.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1995). Families for kids of color: A special report on challenges and opportunities.Battle Creek, MI: Author.
21.
McMahonA., & Allen-MearesP. (1992). Is social work racist? A content analysis of recent literature. Social Work, 37, 533–539.
22.
McRoyR. G. (1994). Attachment and racial identity issues: Implications for child placement decision-making. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 3(3), 59–74.
23.
MoriseyP. G. (1990). Black children in foster care. In Social work practice with Black families: A culturally specific perspective.White Plains, NY: Longman.
24.
National Association of Black Social Workers. (1992). Preserving African American families: Research and action beyond the rhetoric.Detroit, MI: Author.
25.
National Association of Social Workers. (1992). A directory of programs, consultants, and resource materials.Washington, DC: Author.
26.
National Black Child Development Institute. (1989). Who will care when parents can't? A study of Black children in foster care.Washington, DC: Author.
27.
National Resource Center on Family-Based Services. (1994). Annotated directory of selected family-based services programs (8th ed.). Iowa City, IA: Author.
28.
PecoraP. J. (1994). Are intensive family preservation services effective? Yes. In GambrilE., & SteinT. J. (Eds.), Controversial issues in child welfare (pp. 290–303). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
29.
PinderhughesE. E. (1991). The delivery of child welfare services to African American clients. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 599–605.
30.
RossiP. H., FreemanH. E., & WrightS. R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
RzepnickiT. L. (1994). Are intensive family preservation services effective? No. In GambrilE., & SteinT. J. (Eds.), Controversial issues in child welfare (pp. 303–309). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
32.
SchuermanJ. R., RzepnickiT. L., & LittellJ. H. (1994). Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
33.
ShyneA. (1969). The need for foster care.New York: Child Welfare League of America.
34.
SPSSX user's guide. (1986, 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35.
StehnoS. (1990). The elusive continuum of child welfare services: Implications for minority children and youths. Child Welfare, 69, 551–562.
36.
StevensJ. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. (1980). Legislative History, P.L. 96-272, Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, 96th Congress, 2nd Session. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
38.
U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News. (1993). Subpart 2—Family Preservation Support Services. U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, 103rd Congress, 1st Session, 107 Stat. 649–58.St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994, January). Highlights from the family preservation and support services program instruction.Washington, DC: Author.
40.
WaltonE., & DenbyR. W. (1997). Targeting families to receive intensive family preservation services: Assessing the use of imminent risk of placement as a service criterion. Journal of Family Preservation, 2(2), 53–70.
