Using Kingdon's (1995) multiple streams framework, this article analyzes the processes of problem definition, policy proposal, and political decision-making in the passage of civil union legislation in Illinois in 2009–2011. Prominent problem definitions emphasized family vulnerability in the health care system, eclipsing the concerns of religious organizations that the existence of civil unions violated their religious liberty. Political factors which permitted both civil unions and same-sex adoption protection included disorganized and detached opponents; a state attorney general who served as a policy entrepreneur for family rights; and postelection, strategic bipartisan negotiation which opened a narrow window for policy change. Implications for family policy issues are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachrachP., & BaratzM. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
2.
ByersD. S. (2013). “Do they see nothing wrong with this?”: Bullying, bystander complicity, and the role of homophobic bias in the Tyler Clementi case. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(4), 251–258. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4325
CochranG., MontgomeryK. L., & BellH. (2012). Translating evidence-based practices into policy: A case study in Texas. Social Work in Health Care, 51(5), 383–401. doi:10.1080/00981 389.2012.660568
DahlR. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
EdwardsH. R., BryantD. U., & Bent-GoodleyT. (2011). Participation and influence in federal child welfare policymaking. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5(2–3), 145–166. doi:10.1080/15548732.2011.566750
10.
EllisR. A. (2008). Policy practice. In SowersK. M. & DulmusC. N. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare (pp. 129–143). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
HoeferR. (2013). Social workers affecting social policy in the United States. In GalJ. & Weiss-GalI. (Eds.), Social workers affecting social policy: An international perspective on policy practice (pp. 161–182). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
PressmanJ. L., & WildavskyA. B. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland: Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Oakland Project Series (3rd ed). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Weiss-GalI. (2013). Policy practice in practice: The inputs of social workers in legislative committees. Social Work, 58(4), 304–313. doi:10.1093/sw/swt034
