Child welfare-involved parents use court-ordered services to resolve their problems and reunify with children removed from their care. Often this requires the use of multiple service types, service providers, and service locations. Very little research takes this diversity into account: Most studies of service use examine only a single service area. As a result, the field lacks information to guide the development of interventions to increase reunification service use. This descriptive study examines service use across the array of services ordered for a sample of 223 parents attempting to reunify with their children. Most parents had a mixed pattern of service use, with different patterns emerging by parent age, ethnicity, gender, and custodial status. These findings suggest that targeted interventions or service adjustments may be needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpertL. T. (2005). Research review: Parents’ service experience—A missing element in research on foster care case outcomes. Child and Family Social Work, 10, 361–366. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00387.x
2.
AltmanJ. C. (2008). A study of engagement in neighborhood-based child welfare services. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(6), 555–564. doi:10.1177/1049731507309825
3.
AmatoP. R., & GilbrethJ. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children's well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 557–573. doi:10.2307/353560
4.
BarthR. P. (2009). Preventing child abuse and neglect with parent training: Evidence and opportunities. Future of Children, 19(2), 95–118.
5.
BrookJ., & McDonaldT. P. (2007). Evaluating the effects of comprehensive substance abuse intervention on successful reunification. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 664–673. doi:10.1177/1049731507300148.
6.
BrookJ., McDonaldT. P., & YanY. (2012). An analysis of the impact of the Strengthening Families Program on family reunification in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 691–695. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.018
7.
BungerA. C., ChuangE., & McBeathB. (2012). Facilitating mental health service use for caregivers: Referral strategies among child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 696–703. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.014
8.
ChoiS., HuangH., & RyanJ. P. (2012). Substance abuse treatment completion in child welfare: Does substance abuse treatment completion matter in the decision to reunify families? Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 1639–1645. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.022
9.
ChoiS., & RyanJ. P. (2006). Completing substance abuse treatment in child welfare: The role of co-occurring problems and primary drug of choice. Child Maltreatment, 11(4), 313–325. doi:10.1177/1077559506292607
10.
ColeM. A., & CaronS. L. (2010). Exploring factors which lead to successful reunification in domestic violence cases: Interviews with caseworkers. Journal of Family Violence, 25(3), 297–310. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9292-x
11.
CourtneyM. E., McMurtryS. L., & ZinnA. (2004). Housing problems experienced by recipients of child welfare services. Child Welfare, 83(5), 393–422.
12.
D'AndradeA., & ChambersR. (2012). Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(10), 2131–2138. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.008
13.
D'AndradeA., & NguyenH. (2013). The relationship between use of specific services, parental problems, and reunification with children placed in foster care. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(5), 51–69. doi:10.1080/15548732.2013.824399
14.
DaroD., McCurdyK., FalconnierL., WinjeC., AnisfeldE., KatzevA., … NelsonC. (2007). The role of community in facilitating service utilization. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 34(1), 181–204. doi:10.1300/J005v34n01_09.
15.
FamularoR., KinscherffR., BunshaftD., SpivakG., & FentonT. (1989). Parental compliance to court ordered treatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 13, 507–514. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(89)90054-9
16.
GladstoneJ., DumbrillG., LeslieB., KosterA., YoungM., & IsmailaA. (2012). Looking at engagement and outcome from the perspectives of child protection workers and parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 112–118. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.003
17.
GreenB. L., RockhillA., & FurrerC. (2006). Understanding patterns of substance abuse treatment for women involved with child welfare: The influence of the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 149–176. doi:10.1080/00952990500479282
18.
GreenB. L., RockhillA., & FurrerC. (2007). Does substance abuse treatment make a difference for child welfare case outcomes? A statewide longitudinal analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(4), 460–473. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.08.006
19.
GrellaC. E., NeedellB., ShiY., & HserY. (2009). Do drug treatment services predict reunification outcomes of mothers and their children in child welfare? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(3), 278–293. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.010
LibbyA. M., OrtonH. D., BarthR. P., WebbM. B., BurnsB. J., WoodP. A., & SpicerP. (2007). Mental health and substance abuse services to parents of children involved with child welfare: A study of racial and ethnic differences for American Indian parents. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(2), 150–159. doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0099-2
22.
LittellJ. (2001). Client participation and outcomes of intensive family preservation services. Social Work Research, 25(2), 103–1130. doi:10.1093/swr/25.2.103
23.
MacartneyS., BishawA., & FontenotK. (2013). Poverty rates for selected detailed race and Hispanic groups by state and place: 2007–2011. American Community Survey Briefs. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr11-17.pdf.
24.
MarcenkoM. O., LyonsS. J., & CourtneyM. (2011). Mothers’ experiences, resources and needs: The context for reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(3), 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.020
25.
MarshJ. C., RyanJ. P., ChoiS., & TestaM. F. (2006). Integrated services for families with multiple problems: Obstacles to family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 1074–1087. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.012
26.
MirickR. G. (2012). Reactance and the child welfare client: Interpreting parents’ resistance to services through the lens of reactance theory. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 93(3), 165–122. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4224
27.
MirickR. G. (2013). An unsuccessful partnership: Behavioral compliance and strengths-based child welfare practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(4), 227–234. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4323
28.
MirickR. G. (2014). Engagement in child protective services: The role of substance abuse, intimate partner violence and race. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 31, 267–279. doi:10.1007/s10560-013-0320-6
29.
NeedellB., WebsterD., ArmijoM., LeeS., DawsonW., MagruderJ., … LawsonJ. (2013). CCWIP reports. University of California at Berkeley California Child Welfare Indicators Project website. Retrieved from http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare.
RooneyR. H. (2009). Strategies for work with involuntary clients (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
32.
RyanJ. P., MarshJ. C., TestaM. F., & LoudermanR. (2006). Integrating substance abuse treatment and child welfare services: Findings from the Illinois Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Waiver Demonstration. Social Work Research, 30(2), 95–107. doi:10.1093/swr/30.2.95
33.
SmithB. D. (2003). How parental drug use and drug treatment compliance relate to family reunification. Child Welfare, 82(3), 335–365. doi:0009-4021/2003/030335-31.
StaudtM. (2000). Correlates of recommended aftercare service use after intensive family preservation services. Social Work Research, 24(1), 40–50. doi:10.1093/swr/24.1.40
36.
StaudtM., & CherryD (2009). Mental health and substance use problems of parents involved with child welfare: Are services offered and provided? Psychiatric Services, 60(1), 56–60. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.1.56
37.
StromwallL. K., LarsonN. C., NieriT., HolleyL. C., ToppingD., CastilloJ., & AshfordJ. B. (2008). Parents with co-occurring mental health and substance abuse conditions involved with child protection services: Clinical profile and treatment needs. Child Welfare, 87(3), 95–113.
38.
TestaM. F., & SmithB. (2009). Prevention and drug treatment. Future of Children, 19(2), 147–168.
39.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration for Children and Families, Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011). Family reunification: What the evidence shows. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/issue_briefs/family_reunification.
40.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration for Children and Families, Children's Bureau. (2013). Child welfare outcomes 2008–2011: Report to Congress. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cwo08_11.pdf.
41.
YatchmenoffD. K. (2005). Measuring client engagement from the client's perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 84–96. doi:10.1177/1049731504271605
