The construct of resilience describes situations in which people overcome negative consequences typically associated with high levels of risk. This study applied the construct of resilience to family systems looking at ways families are able to maintain high functioning despite facing difficult experiences. A mixed methods study was conducted to test relationships between the variables of risk, family strengths, and family functioning. Quantitative findings suggest that families do experience resilience. The variable of family strengths predicted higher levels of family functioning despite the level of risk. The results lend empirical support to the use of strength-building in family practice. Qualitative results and relevance of the entire study are presented in an upcoming second article (Part 2).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen-MearesP. (1995). Social Work with Children and Adolescents.New York: Longman.
2.
BarnardC. P. (1994). Resiliency: A shift in our perception?The American Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 135–144.
3.
BordenW. (1992). Narrative perspective in psychosocial intervention following adverse life events.Social Work, 37, 135–141.
4.
BlundoR. (2001). Learning strengths-based practice: Challenging our personal and professional frames.Families in Society, 82, 296–304.
5.
CohenO., SlonimI., FinziR., & LeichtentrittR. D. (2002). Family resilience: Israeli mothers’ perspectives.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 173–187.
6.
CreswellJ., Plano ClarkV., GutmannM., & HansonW. (2003). Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs. In CreswellJ. (Ed.), The handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DalyK. J. (1999). Crisis of genealogy: facing the challenges of infertility. In McCubbinH., ThompsonE., ThompsonA., & FutrellJ. (Eds.), The dynamics of resilient families, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
De HaanL., HawleyD., & DealJ. (2002). Operationalizing family resilience: A methodological strategy.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 275–291.
9.
EarlyT. J., & GlenMayeL. F. (2000). Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective.Social Work, 45, 118–130.
10.
EngelS. (1995). The stories children tell: Making sense of the narratives of childhood.New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
11.
FontanaA., & FreyJ. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In DenzinN. & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
FraserM. W., RichmanJ. M., & GalinskyM. J. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice.Social Work, 23(3), 131–143.
13.
FranzosiR. (1998). Narrative analysis—Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative.Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517–554.
14.
FristadM. (1989). A comparison of the McMaster and circumplex family assessment instruments.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 259–260.
15.
GarmezyN. (1994). Reflections and commentary on risk, resilience, and development. In HaggertyR., SherrodL., GarmezyN., & RutterM. (Eds.), Stress, risk, and resilience in children and adolescents: Process, mechanisms, and interventions.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HawleyD. (2000). Clinical implication of family resilience.American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 101–117.
17.
LietzC. A. (in press). Uncovering stories of family resilience: A mixed methods study of resilient families, part 2. Families in Society.
18.
McCubbinH., McCubbinM., & ThompsonA. (1993). Resiliency in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to crises. In BrubakerT. H. (Ed.), Family relations: Challenges for the future.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
McCubbinH., PattersonJ. & WilsonL. (1983). Family inventory of life events and change. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Family Social Sciences.
20.
McMillenJ. C. (1999). Better for it: How people benefit from adversity.Social Work, 44, 455–466.
21.
MedererH. J. (1999). Surviving the demise of a way of life: Stress and resilience in northeastern commercial fishing families. In H. McCubbin, E. A. Thompson, A. Thompson, & J. Futrell, The dynamics of resilient families, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MillerI., BishopD., EpsteinN., & KeitnerG. (1985). The McMaster family assessment device: Reliability and validity.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 354–356.
23.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
NeimeyerR. A., & StewartA. E. (1996). Trauma, healing, and the narrative employment of loss.Families in Society, 77, 360–375.
25.
NicholsM. P. (2004). Family therapy: Concepts and methods.New York: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
26.
NicholsM. P., & SchwartzR. C. (2001). Family therapy: Concepts and methods.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
NobleD., PerkinsK., & KatoutM. (2000). On being a strengths coach: Child welfare and the strengths model.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17, 141–153.
28.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
PattersonJ. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory.Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.
30.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
RutterM. (1990). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In RolfJ. & GarmezyN. (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology.New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SaleebeyD. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice.New York: Longman.
33.
SaleebeyD. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions.Social Work, 41, 296–305.
34.
SaleebeyD. (Ed.). (2002). The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin in research.Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 371–375.
36.
SmithC., & CarlsonB (1997). Stress, coping, and resilience in children and youth.Social Service Review, 71, 231–256.
37.
SmokowskiP. (1998). Prevention and intervention strategies for promoting resilience in disadvantaged children.Social Service Review, 72, 337–364.
38.
SullivanW. P., & RappC. A. (1994). Breaking away: The potential and promise of a strengths-based approach to social work practice. In MeinertR., PardukJ., & SullivanW. (Eds.), Issues in social work: A critical analysis.Westport, CT: Auburn House.
39.
TurnerS. G. (2001). Resilience and social work practice: Three case studies.Families in Society, 82, 441–448.
40.
TuttyL. (1995). Theoretical and practical issues in selecting a measure of family functioning.Research on Social Work Practice, 5, 80–106.
41.
WallerM., & Yellow BirdM. (2002). Strengths of first nations peoples. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
WalshF. (1998). Strengthening family resilience.New York: Guilford.
43.
WalshF. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications.Family Relations, 51, 130–137.
44.
WeickA. (1992). Building a strengths perspective for social work. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice.New York: Longman.
45.
WernerE., & SmithR (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood.New York: Cornell University Press.
46.
WernerE., & SmithR (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth.New York: Adams, Bannister and Cox.
47.
WolinS., & WolinS (1993). The resilient self: How survivors of troubled families rise above adversity.New York: Villard.
48.
WorthamS. (2001). Narrative in action.New York: Teacher's College Press.
