This study provides a phenomenological description of pre- and postretirement perceptions of family and their impact on adjustment to retirement. The study is qualitative and employs interviews as a means of collecting life stories and life scenarios of men on the eve of their retirement transition. The findings corroborate that retirement is a family transition. The most important results shed light on retirees’ loneliness and need for support. Supportive preretirement interventions are recommended. In addition, the results showed family perceptions’ contribution to postretirement adjustment. Thus, in order to help the retirees to accept their retirement transition, it suggests that the preretirement intervention should focus on the family as a whole, especially when retirees plan their future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtchleyR. C. (1976). The sociology of retirement.Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
2.
AtchleyR. C. (1992). Retirement and marital satisfaction. In SzinovaczM., EkertdD. J., & VinikB. H. (Eds.), Families and retirement (pp. 145–159). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontology: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of development theory.American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.
4.
BarnesH., & ParryJ (2004). Renegotiating identity and relationships: Men and women's adjustment to retirement,Aging and Society, 24, 213–233.
5.
Bar-TurL. (1991). Separation individuation in aging and retirement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
6.
CarpF. M. (1972). Retirement.New York: Human Science Press.
7.
CohlerB. (1998). Psychoanalysis, the life story, and aging: Creating new meaning within narratives of lived experience. In LomeranzJ. (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health (pp. 255–280). New York: Plenum.
8.
ColarussoC. A., & NemiroffR. A. (1981). Adult development: A new dimension in psychodynamic theories.New York: Plenum.
9.
ColemanP. G. (1986). Aging and reminiscence process: Social and clinical implications.New York: Wiley.
10.
CorradiC. (1991). Text, context and individual meaning: Rethinking life stories in hermeneutic framework.Discourse and Society, 2, 105–118.
11.
ElderG. H. (1995). The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. In MoenP., ElderG. H.Jr., & LuscherK. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 101–139). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
GallT. L., EvansD. R., & HowardJ. (1997). The retirement process: Changes in the well-being of male retirees across time. Journal of Gerontology, 52B, 110-117.
13.
GeorgeL. K. (1993). Sociological perspectives on life transitions.Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 353–373.
14.
GouldR. (1978). Transformation: Growth and change in adult life. New-York: Simon & Schuster.
15.
HagbergB. (1995). The individual's life history as a formative experience to age. In HaightB. K. & WebsterJ. D. (Eds.), The art and science of reminiscing: Theory, research, methods and applications (pp. 61–75). London: Taylor & Francis.
16.
HenrettaJ. C., O'RandA. M., & ChanC. G. (1993). Joint role investment and synchronization of retirement: A sequential approach to couples’ retirement timing.Social Forces, 71, 981–1000.
17.
HochschildA. R. (1975). Disengagement theory: A critique and proposal.American Sociological Review, 40, 553–569.
18.
KaufmanS. (1986). The ageless self: Sources of meaning in late life.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19.
KulikL. (2004). Perceived equality in spousal relations, marital quality, and life satisfaction: A comparison of elderly wives and husbands,Families in Society, 85, 243–250.
20.
KulikL. (1999). Continuity and discontinuity in marital life after retirement: Life orientation, gender role, ideology, intimacy, and satisfaction.Families in Society, 80, 286–294.
21.
KulikL., & Zuckerman-BareliH. (1997). Continuity and discontinuity in attitudes toward marital power relations: Pre-retired vs. retired husbands.Aging and Society, 17, 577–595.
22.
LindeC. (1993). Life stories—The creation of coherence.New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
LowenthalM. F., ThurnherM., & ChiribogaD. (1975). Four stages of life: A comparative study of women and men facing transition.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
MaddoxG. L. (Ed.). (1987). The encyclopedia of aging.New York: Springer.
25.
McAdamsD. (1985). Power, intimacy and life story: Personological inquiries into identity. Homewood, IL: Dorsey
26.
McCraeR., & CostaP (1990). Personality in adulthood.New York: Guilford.
27.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
PeresY., & KatzR (1990). The family in Israel: Change and continuity. In ShamgarL.-Handelmann & Bar-YosefR. (Eds.), Families in Israel[in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Academon.
29.
QuickH. E., & MoenP. (1998). Gender, employment, and retirement quality: A life course approach to the differential experiences of men and women.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 44–64.
30.
RyffC. D. (1984). Personality development from the inside: The subjective experience of change in adulthood and aging. In BaltesP. & BrimO. (Eds.), The life span development and behavior (Vol. 6., pp. 243–279). New York: Academic.
31.
SagyS. (1989). Individual versus familiar sense of coherence characteristics in explaining adaptation to retirement transition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, BenGurion University, Beersheba, Israel.
32.
SagyS., & AntonovskyA (1992). The family sense of coherence and the retirement transition,Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 983–993.
33.
SagyS., & AntonovskyH (1999). Structural recourses contributing to the development of sense of coherence: Analysis of life stories [in Hebrew].Sichot, 14, 51–56.
34.
SavishnskyJ. S. (2000). Breaking the watch: The meaning of retirement in America.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
SmithD. B., & MoenP. (1998). Spousal influence on retirement: His, her and their perceptions.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 734–744.
36.
StrengerC. (1999). Individuality: The impossible project[in Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Am Oved.
37.
SzinovaczM., EkertdD. J., & VinikB. H. (Eds.). (1992). Families and retirement.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
SzinovaczM., & HarpsterP (1993). Employment status, gender role attitudes, and marital dependence in later life.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 927–940.
39.
TheriaultJ. (1994). Retirement as a psychosocial transition: Process of adaptation to change.International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 38, 153–170.
40.
UnrauY., & ColemanH (1997). Qualitative data analysis. In GrinnellM. (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (pp. 512–514). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
41.
VineyL. L. (1993). Life stories: Personal construct therapy with the elderly.London: Wiley.
42.
WhitbourneS. K. (1985). The psychological construction of the life span. In BirrenJ. E. & SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of aging (2nd ed., pp. 594–618). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
