Justice Implications of the Proposed Federal Family and Work Tax Credits: Applying Justice Theories to Policy Advocacy

Abstract

A 2005 Presidential Advisory Panel on Tax Reform proposed a family credit and a work credit to replace some current tax credits, deductions, and exemptions. Taxes are overlooked by many social workers as a policy instrument for increasing the disposable income of low- and moderate-income families. This paper analyzes the proposed new credits through a justice framework. Social justice often is defined as the equitable distribution of societal resources. This definition reflects one type of justice–-Rawls's egalitarian philosophy. A more nuanced understanding of justice may enable coalition building in policy making, leading to the enactment of tax policy that helps families pay for their basic needs–-a goal of both direct service and policy practice social work practitioners.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramovitz

(2001). Everyone is still on welfare: The role of redistribution in social policy. Social Work, 46(4), 297–308.

Abramovitz

, & Morgen

(2006). Taxes are a woman's issue: Reframing the debate. New York: Feminist Press at the City University of New York.

Ackley

(1978). Macroeconomics: Theory and policy. New York: Macmillan.

Amidei

(1991). Tax policy and the public welfare: Becoming tax literate is more than reading lips. Public Welfare, 49(2), 13–20.

Aron-Dine

, & Friedmann

(2006). Effects of the tax reform panel's proposals on low- and moderate-income households. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved April 22, 2006, from http://www.cbpp.org/2-3-06tax.pdf.

Americans for Tax Reform. (2005, January 7). ATR applauds creation of tax reform panel. Retrieved April 22, 2006, from http://www.atr.org/content/html/2005/jan/pr_taxpanel_1-7-05.htm.

Beverly

S. G.

(2002). What social workers need to know about the earned income tax credit. Social Work, 47(3), 259–266.

Bisman

(2004). Social work values: The moral core of the profession. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 109–123.

Braybrooke

(1987). Meeting needs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10.

Brownlee

W. L.

(1996). Federal taxation in America: A short history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Burman

L. E.

, & Gale

W. G.

(2005, December 5). A preliminary evaluation of the tax reform panel's report. Tax Notes, 1349-1368.

12.

Chernick

, & Reschovsky

(1990). The taxation of the poor. The Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 712–735.

13.

Council on Social Work Education Commission on Accreditation. (2008). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures (5th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

14.

Dinerman

(2003). How much inequality can democracy manage? Affilia, 18(4), 373-377.

15.

Duncan

, & Machan

T. R.

(2005). Libertarianism: For and against. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

16.

Economic Growth and Tax Reconciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-16, Stat. 38 (2001).

17.

Exec. Order No. 13,369. (2005, January 7). President's Advisory Panel on Tax Reform. Retrieved April 22, 2006, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/01/20050107-1.html.

18.

Foster

J. D.

(2008). The tax relief program worked: Make the tax cuts permanent. Backgrounder, No. 2145. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.

19.

Furman

(2005). The tax reform panel's costly proposal. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Web site: http://www.cbpp.org/2-3-06tax.pdf.

20.

Gallston

W. A.

(1980). Justice and the human good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Gates

W. H.

Sr. , & Collins

(2003). Wealth and our commonwealth: Why America should tax accumulated fortunes. Boston: Beacon Press.

22.

Gil

D. G.

(1992). Unravelling social policy: Theory, analysis and political action towards social equality. Rochester, VT: Schenkman Books.

23.

Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP). (2005). The ITEP guide to state and local taxes: A primer on fair tax and adequate taxation—And how to achieve it in your state. Washington, DC: Author.

24.

Irons

J. S.

(2005, October 19). President's tax panel proposes broad reforms: Panelists warn against cherry-picking. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

25.

Irons

J. S.

(2006, March 20). Tax reform is dead…Long live tax reform! Tax Notes, 1350-1352.

26.

Larkin

(2004). Justice implications of a proposed Medicare prescription drug policy. Social Work, 49(3), 406–414.

27.

Levitis

J. A.

(2007). The impact of state income taxes on low-income families in 2006. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

28.

Mankiw

N. G.

(2004). Principles of microeconomics (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson-South Western.

29.

McClellan

(2003). The case for higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 18(4), 11–53.

30.

Mehrotra

A. K.

(2005). Rethinking redistribution: Tax policy in an era of rising inequality. 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1793.

31.

Miller

(1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

32.

Mitchell

(2005). Grading the tax reform panel's recommendations. (WebMemo No. 903). Retrieved March 20, 2006, from the Heritage Foundation Web site: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm903.cfm.

33.

National Association of Social Workers. (2006a). Economic policy. In Social work speaks (pp. 399–415). Washington, DC: Author.

34.

National Association of Social Workers. (2006b). Code of ethics. In Social work speaks (pp. 103–110). Washington, DC: Author.

35.

Office of Management and Budget. (2005). Budget of the U.S. government FY 2006, historical tables, Table 2.2. Retrieved October 17, 2008, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/pdf/hist.pdf.

36.

OMB Watch. (2006). Federal budget: Tax panel offers “tough love” tax reform recommendations. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/3175.

37.

Phillips

(2002). Wealth and democracy: A political history of the American rich. New York: Broadway Books.

38.

President's Advisory Panel on Tax Reform. (2005). Simple, fair, and pro-growth: Proposals to fix America's tax system. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.

39.

Price

(2005). The boom that wasn't. Retrieved April 24, 2006, from the Economic Policy Institute Web site: http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/bp168.

40.

Rawls

(1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

41.

Reamer

F. G.

(1993). The philosophical foundations of social work. New York: Columbia University Press.

42.

Rosenberg

(2007, March 26). State individual income tax progressivity. Tax Notes, 1259.

43.

Samuelson

P. A.

, & Nordhaus

W. D.

(1995). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

44.

Seipel

M. M. O.

(2000). Tax reform for low-wage workers. Social Work, 45(1), 65–72.

45.

Solomon

R. C.

, & Murphy

M. C.

(2000). What is justice? Classic and contemporary readings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

46.

Sterba

J. P.

(1999). Justice: Alternative political perspectives (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

47.

Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (1986).

48.

Van Soest

(1994). Strange bedfellows: A call for reordering national priorities from three social justice perspectives. Social Work, 39(6), 710–717.

49.

Varian

H. R.

(2005, May 5). What should a reconfigured tax system look like? The New York Times. Retrieved May 6, 2005, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/05/business/05scene.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=What%20should%20a%20reconfigured%20tax%20system%20look%20&st=cse&oref=slogin.

50.

Wheelan

(2002). Naked economics: Undressing the dismal science. New York: W. W. Norton.