This paper presents a study of family reactions to African American adult daughters’ conversions from Christianity to Islam. Examining qualitative data from interviews with Christian mothers and Muslim daughters in 17 family units, we explored reactions to a family member's religious conversion initially and over time. We also identified the specific challenges facing African American families when a daughter converts to Islam. We found a wide range of initial emotional responses to an adult daughter's conversion. Over time, the families showed marked changes, predominantly in the direction of increased respect and acceptance. Reactions to the change and the challenges facing the families are discussed in relation to several theories, including ambiguous loss, and implications for practice are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlstromS. E. (1972). A religious history of the American people.New Haven: Yale University Press.
2.
AntonovskyA. (1979). Health, stress and coping.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
AntonovskyA. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion.Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18.
4.
BaerH. A., & SingerM. (2002). African American religion: Varieties of protest and accommodation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
5.
von BertalanffyL. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.
6.
BillingsleyA. (1991). The church, the family, and the school in the African American community.Journal of Negro Education, 60(3), 427–440.
7.
BillingsleyA. (1992). Climbing Jacob's ladder: The enduring legacy of African-American families.New York: Simon & Schuster.
8.
BossP. (1991). Ambiguous loss. In WalshF. & McGoldrickM. (Eds.), Living beyond loss (pp. 164–175). New York: Norton Press.
9.
BossP. (1999). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
10.
BossP. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
BossP. (2004). Ambiguous loss research, theory and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 551–566.
12.
BossP. (2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience: Therapeutic work with ambiguous loss.New York: W. W. Norton.
13.
BossP. (2007). Family relations ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners.Family Relations, 56(2), 105–111.
14.
BowenM. (1976). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
15.
CarrollJ. S., OlsonC. D., & BuckmillerN. (2007). Family boundary ambiguity: A 30-year review of theory, research, and measurement.Family Relations, 56(2), 210–230.
16.
ConradA. P. (1999). Professional tools for religiously and spiritually sensitive social work practice. In GreeneR. R. (Ed.), Human behavior theory and social work pactice (2nd ed., pp. 63–73). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
17.
CurtisE. E. (2002). Islam in Black America. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
18.
DanninR. (2002). Black pilgimage to Islam. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
DonigerW. (Ed.). (1999). Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
20.
EmmonsR. A., & PaloutzianR. F. (2003). The psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 377–402.
21.
HillR. (1949). Families under stress. New York: Harper & Row.
22.
HillR. (1958). Generic features of families under stress.Social Casework, 49, 139–50.
23.
HillR. (1972). The strengths of black families.New York: Emerson Hall.
24.
HinesP. M., & Boyd-FranklinN. (1982). Black families. In McGoldrickM., PearceJ. K., & GiordanoJ. (Eds.), Ethnicity & family therapy (pp. 84–107). New York: Guilford Press.
25.
KosminB. A., & MayerE. (2001). American religious identification survey (ARIS). Retrieved October 17, 2006, from the Graduate Center, City University of New York Web site: http://www.gc.cuny.edu/faculty/research_briefs/aris.pdf.
26.
KoxW., MeeusW., & HartH. (1991). Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark model of religious conversion.Sociological Analysis, 52(3), 227–240.
27.
Kübler-RossE. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Macmillan.
28.
LawtonL. E., & BuresR. (2001). Parental divorce and the switching of religious identity.Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(1), 99–110.
29.
LazarusR. S., & FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
30.
LindemannE. (1944). The symptomatology and management of acute grief.American Journal of Psychiatry, 101, 141–148.
31.
Littlejohn-BlakeS. M., & DarlingC. A. (1993). Understanding the strengths of African American families.Journal of Black Studies, 23(4), 460–471.
32.
MamiyaL. (2001). The Black Muslims. In GlazierS. D. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of African and African-American religions (pp. 55–59). New York: Routledge.
33.
MarksL., NesterukO., SwansonM., GarrisonB., & DavisT. (2005). Religion and health among African Americans: A qualitative examination.Research on Aging, 27(4), 447–474.
34.
MattisJ. S. (2001). Religion and African American political life.Political Psychology, 22(2), 263–278.
35.
McCloudA. B. (1995). African American Islam. New York: Routledge.
36.
McCubbinH. I., & PattersonJ. M. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of family adjustment and adaptation. In McCubbinH. I., SussmanM. B., & PattersonJ. M. (Eds.), Social stress and the family: Advances and developments in family stress theory and research (pp. 7–37). New York: Haworth.
37.
McGoldrickM., Garcia-PretoN., HinesP., & LeeE. E. (1992). Ethnicity and family therapy. In GurmanA. & KniskernD. (Eds.), The handbook of family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
38.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.
39.
MinuchinS., LeeW. Y., & SimonM. (1996). Mastering family therapy: Journeys of growth and transformation.New Jersey: Wiley and Sons.
40.
MockM. (2006). The religious intensification and family relations: The Netherlands case. Doctoral disssertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
41.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
PaloutzianR. F., RichardsonJ. T., & RamboL. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change.Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1047–1079.
43.
PattersonJ. M. (2002). Understanding family resilience.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 214–233.
44.
Princeton Religion Research Center. (2000). Americans remain very religious, but not necessarily in conventional ways.Emerging Trends, 22(1), 2–3.
45.
RandoT. (1993). Treatment of complicated mourning.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
46.
Roer-StrierD., & SandsR. G. (2001). The impact of religious intensification on family relations: A South African example.Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 868–880.
47.
RoofW. C. (1993). A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
48.
SandsR. G., & Roer-StrierD. (2004). Divided families: Impact of religious difference and geographic distance on intergenerational family continuity.Family Relations, 53(1), 102–110.
49.
SherkatD. E. (2002). African American religious affiliation in the late 20th century: Cohort variations and patterns of switching, 1973-1998.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 485–493.
50.
SmithJ. I. (1999). Islam in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
51.
UllmanC. (1989). The transformed self: The psychology of religious conversion. New York: Plenum Press.
52.
VaughnS. (1997). Making Jesus black: The historiographical debate on the roots of African-American Christianity.The Journal of Negro History, 82(1), 25–41.
53.
WhiteJ. M., & KleinD. M. (2002). Family theories (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
