The Latino population is growing rapidly in the United States. In keeping with the devout spirituality that animates Latino culture, one program that appeals to many Latino families with school-age children is release time, a little-known program that allows children to be released from class to receive spiritual instruction. The increasing use of high-stakes standardized testing has placed pressure on schools to eliminate spiritual release time programs due to concerns that excusing students from class may hinder their academic achievement. This study sought to test the assumption that releasing Latino students from class to receive spiritual instruction results in lower test scores relative to their nonparticipating peers. The results suggest that release time enhances rather than inhibits academic achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltshulerS. J., & SchmautzT. (2006). No Hispanic student left behind: The consequences of “high stakes” testing. Children & Schools, 28(1), 5–14.
2.
BaerR. A., & CarperJ. C. (1998). Spirituality and the public schools: An evangelical perspective. Educational Leadership, 56(4), 33–37.
DehijiaR. H., & WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
10.
EpleyB. G. (2007). The Establishment Clause and public schools in the 21st century. NASSP Bulletin, 91(3), 181–200.
11.
FarleyJ. E. (2005). Majority-minority relations (5th ed.). New Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
FaulF., ErdfelderE., LangA. G., & BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
13.
FryR., & GonzalesF (2008). One-in-five and growing fast: A profile of Hispanic public school students. Retrieved from the Pew Hispanic Center website: http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/92.pdf
14.
GardinerM. E., Canfield-DavisK., & AndersonK. L. (2009). Urban school principals and the “No Child Left Behind” Act. Urban Review, 41, 141–160.
15.
GiessM. E., & MooreD. L. (2009). Released time for religious instruction. In CarperJ. C. & HuntT. C. (Eds.), Religion and education in the United States (Vol. 2; pp. 361–363). Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
GlanvilleJ. L., SikkinkD., & HernandezE. I. (2008). Religious involvement and educational outcomes: The role of social capital and extracurricular participation. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 105–137.
17.
HamH. M. (1966). Evaluating release time: A study of the release time program of religious education in Rochester, New York. International Journal of Religious Education, 43, 3–14.
18.
HirschD. (2006, June 1). S.C. clears way for high school religion courses. Charlotte Observer, p. A1.
19.
HodgeD. R., & CuddebackG. S. (2010). Release time and academic outcomes: Does releasing students for religious or moral education negatively affect test scores?Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(1), 56–65.
20.
HodgeD. R., MarsigliaF. F., & NieriT. (2011). Religion and substance use among youth of Mexican heritage: A social capital perspective. Social Work Research, 35(3), 137-146.
21.
JohnsonB. R. (2002). Objective hope. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
22.
KarkJ. D., ShemiG., FriedlanderY., MartinO., ManorO., & BlondheimS. H. (1996). Does religious observance promote health? Mortality in secular vs. religious kibbutzim in Israel. American Journal of Public Health, 86(3), 341–346.
23.
KoenigH. G., McCulloughM. E., & LarsonD. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
KrashenS. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
25.
LayJ. C., & Stokes-BrownA. K. (2009). Put to the test: Understanding differences in support for high-stakes testing. American Politics Research, 37(3), 429–448.
26.
LeonnigC. D. (1991, January 29). Board rejects religious training idea—Release time would send students to churches during school day. Charlotte Observer, p. B1.
27.
LuellenJ. K., ShadishW. R., & ClarkM. H. (2005). Propensity scores: An introduction and experimental test. Evaluation Review, 29(6), 530–558.
28.
McNeilL. M., CoppolaE., RadiganJ., & HeiligJ. V. (2008). Avoidable losses: High-stakes accountability and the dropout crisis. Educational Policy Analysis Achieves, 16(3), 1–48.
29.
MorrisM. W., KrisbergB., & DhanoaS. (2003). Released time Bible education.Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
30.
National Association of Social Workers [NAS W]. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp
31.
PargamentK. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
ParkH.-S. (2001). Religiousness as a predictor of academic performance. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 10(2), 361–378.
33.
PeikesD. N., MorenoL., & OrzolS. M. (2008). Propensity score matching: A note of caution for evaluators and social programs. The American Statistician, 62(2), 222–231.
34.
Pew Research Center. (2007). Changing faiths: Latinos and the transformation of American religion. Washington, DC: Pew
QuintanaS. M., AboudF. E., ChaoR. K., Contreras-GrauJ., CrossW. E., HudleyC., … VietzeD. L. (2006). Race, ethnicity, and culture in child development: Contemporary research and future directions. Child Development, 77(5), 1129–1141.
37.
RavitchD., & ChubbJ. E. (2009). The future of No Child Left Behind: End it or mend it?Education Next, 9(3), 48–56.
38.
RegnerusM. D., & ElderG. H. (2003). Staying on track in school: Religious influences in high- and low-risk settings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(4), 633–649.
39.
RegnerusM., SmithC., & FritschM. (2003). Religion in the lives of American adolescents: A review of the literature (Technical Report No. 3). Chapel Hill, NC: National Study of Youth and Religion, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
40.
ReyhnerJ., & HurtadoD. S. (2008). Reading first, literacy, and American Indian/Alaska Native students. Journal of American Indian Education, 47(1), 82–95.
41.
RianR. (1990, November 4). Religion classes face study—School district fears learning time lost. Daily News of Los Angeles, p. N3.
42.
RosenbaumP. R., & RubinD. B. (1983). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
43.
RussoC. J. (2009). Zorach v. Clauson. In CarperJ. C. & HuntT. C. (Eds.), Religion and education in the United States (Vol. 2; pp. 474–475). Westport, CT: Praeger.
44.
SandersM. G., & HertingJ. R. (2000). Gender and the effects of school, family, and church support on the academic achievement of African-American urban adolescents. In SandersM. G. (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 141–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
ShrinerM., MullisR., & ShrinerB. (2010). Variation in family structure and school-age children's academic achievement: A social and resource capital perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 46(6/7), 445–467.
47.
StiefelL., SchwartzA. E., & EllenI. G. (2007). Disentangling the racial test score gap: Probing the evidence in a large urban school district. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 7–30.
48.
StonesE. E. (2006). Release-time for religious instruction: Public high school administrators’ attitudes and perceptions. Doctoral dissertation, College of Education, Washington State University. Retrieved from https://research.wsulibs.wsu.edu:8443/jspui/handle/2376/469
49.
ThomasO. S. (1999). Legal leeway on church-state in school. School Administrator, 56(1), 12–16.
50.
TrotterA. (1995). On board the Bible bus. The Executive Educator, 12(12), 14–16.
VaughnM. G., BeaverK. M., WexlerJ., DeLisiM., & RobertsG. J. (2011). The effect of school dropout on verbal ability in adulthood: A propensity score matching approach. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 40, 197–206.
55.
WalkerK. L., & DixonV. (2002). Spirituality and academic performance among African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 28(2), 107–121.
56.
ZimmermanJ. (2002). Whose America?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
