“We Had not Dared to do that Earlier,but now we See that it Works”: Creating a culturally responsive mathematics exam

Abstract

This paper describes two Sámi mathematics teachers’ development of an innovative instructional practice. Having recognized that Norway's national written exam disadvantaged their students, the teachers developed and established a culturally responsive local oral mathematics exam as part of a five-year research project that took place between 2010 and 2015 in Guovdageaidnu, Norway. The aim of the paper is to illuminate the role of teachers’ autonomy in the process towards Indigenous educational self-determination. We analyse the teachers’ development from a state of recovery to a state of self-determination with respect to a framework consisting of (a) the four states in Smith's (2012) Indigenous research agenda: survival, recovery, development and self-determination; and (b) Deci and Ryan's (2012) distinction between supporting autonomy and controlling behaviour. The teachers’ development of a culturally responsive mathematics exam reflects their development towards self-determination. We draw on data consisting of audio recordings and handwritten notes from meetings between the teachers and researchers.

Keywords

ethnomathematics self-determination autonomy teachers exam Sámi

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balto

(2005). Traditional Sámi child-rearing in transition: Shaping a new pedagogical platform. AlterNative, 1(1), 90–113.

Battiste

(Ed.). (2000). Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.

Bedford

(2009). Promoting educational equity through teacher empowerment: Web-assisted transformative action research as a counter-heteronormative praxis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu, Finland). Retrieved from http://jultika.oulu.f/files/isbn9789514290572.pdf

Bergstr⊘m

G. G.

(2001). Tradisjonell kunnskap og samisk modernitet: En studie av vilkår for tileg-nelse av tradisjonell kunnskap i en moderne samisk samfunnskontekst [Traditional knowledge and Sámi modernity: A study of conditions for acquisition of traditional knowledge in a modern Sámi society context] (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Troms⊘, Norway.

Bishop

A. J.

, & Forgasz

H. J.

(2007). Issues in access and equity in mathematics education. In Lester

(Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1145–1167). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Bojlén

(2001). Fokusgruppe: Hvad, hvor-for, hvordan? [Focus group: What, why and how?]. Månedsskrift for praktisk lægegerning [Monthly journal for medical practitioners], 79(8), 909–917.

Cai

, & Wang

(2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 265–287. http://doi.org/ftcwkj

Darnell

, & Hoëm

(1996). Taken to extremes: Education in the Far North. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.

Deci

E. L.

, & Ryan

R. M.

(2012). Motivation, personality and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In Ryan

R. M.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–108). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/f28kkz

10.

Doolittle

(2006). Mathematics as medicine. In Liljedahl

(Ed.), Proceedings from the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group 2006 Annual Meeting, University of Calgary (pp. 17–25). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary. Retrieved from http://fles.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529562.pdf

11.

Fyhn

A. B.

, Jannok Nutti

, Eira

E. J. S.

, B⊘rresen

, Sandvik

S. O.

, & Hætta

O. E.

(2015). Ruvden as a basis for the teaching of mathematics: A Sámi mathematics teacher's experiences. In Huaman

E. S.

, & Sriraman

(Eds.), Indigenous innovation: Universalities and peculiarities (pp. 169–186). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers. http://doi.org/brxj

12.

Fyhn

A. B.

, & Nystad

I. K. M.

(2014). Sami culture and values: A study of the National Mathematics Exam for the Compulsory School in Norway. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 44(3), 349–367. http://doi.org/brxk

13.

Gay

(2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. http://doi.org/bpjq8c

14.

Guttorm

(2011). Árbediehtu (Sami traditional knowledge) as a concept and in practice. Diedut, 1, 59–76. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/id/165652/Diedut-1-2011_GunvorGuttorm.pdf

15.

Hirvonen

(2004). Sámi culture and the school: Reflections by Sámi teachers and the realization of the Sámi School: An evaluation study of Reform 97. Karasjok, Norway: Cálliid Lágádus.

16.

Jannok Nutti

(2010). Ripsteg mot samisk spet-skunskap i matematik-Lārares perspektiv på transformeringsaktiviteter i samisk fōrskola och sameskola [Grouse steps towards frontline knowledge in Sámi mathematics: Teachers’ perspectives on transformation activities in Sámi preschool and school] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.

17.

Jannok Nutti

(2013). Indigenous teachers’ experiences of the implementation of culture-based mathematics activities in Sámi School. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 57–72. http://doi.org/brxm

18.

Jávo

A. C.

(2003). Child-rearing and child behavior problems in a Sámi population (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Troms⊘, Norway.

19.

Jernsletten

(1997). Sami traditional terminology: Professional terms concerning salmon, reindeer and snow. In Gaski

(Ed.), Sami culture in a new era: The Norwegian Sami experience (pp. 86–108). Karasjok, Norway: Davvi Girji OS.

20.

Keskitalo

J. H.

(2009). Sámi máhttu ja sámi sku-vlamáhttu: Teorehtalaš geahčastat [Sámi knowledge and Sámi school knowledge: A theoretical perspective]. Sámi dieđalaš áigecála, 9(1-2), 62–75. Retrieved from http://site.uit.no/aigecala/sda-1-2-2009_keskitalo

21.

Keskitalo

, Māātāā

, & Uusiautti

(2011). How to develop Indigenous peoples’ education? Issues and solutions of Sámi education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 34–50. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/articles/2014/457-1406611925.pdf

22.

Klafki

(1999). School quality, school program, and teacher self-evaluation. European Education, 31(4), 73–90. http://doi.org/cn5gmq

23.

Klausen

A. M.

(1992). Kultur, m⊘nster og kaos [Culture, pattern and chaos]. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam Gyldendal A/S.

24.

KUF [Ministry of Education, Research and Church Affairs] (1997). Det samiske læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen [The Sámi curriculum for the ten-year compulsory school]. Guovdageaidnu, Norway: Sámi oahpahusráÐÐi.

25.

Kuokkanen

(2006). Indigenous peoples on two continents: Self-determination processes in Sámi and First Nation societies. Native American Studies, 20(2), 1–6.

26.

Kuokkanen

(2008). Boaris dego eana: Eamiálbmogiid diehtu, flosofjat ja dutkan [As old as the earth: Indigenous knowledge, philosophies and research]. Karasjok, Norway: Cálliid Lágádus.

27.

Lipka

, & Adams

(2004). Culturally based math education as a way to improve Alaska Native students’ math performance (Working Paper No. 20). Appalachian Collaborative Centre for Learning, Assessment and Instruction in Mathematics. Athens, OH: Ohio University.

28.

Meaney

(2002). Symbiosis or cultural clash? Indigenous students learning mathematics. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 167–187. http://doi.org/c5x37d

29.

Planas

, & Civil

(2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 391–409. http://doi.org/bdqwjx

30.

Porsanger

, & Guttorm

(2011). Building up the field of study and research on Sami traditional knowledge (árbediehtu). In Porsanger

, & Guttorm

(Eds.), Diedut: Working with traditional knowledge: Communities, institutions, information systems, law and ethics (pp. 13–57). Guovdageaidnu, Norway: Sámi University College.

31.

Ryan

R. M.

, & Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. http://doi.org/bq5pm6

32.

Sara

M. N.

(2004). Samisk kunnskap i undervisning og læremidler [Sámi knowledge in teaching and teaching aids]. In Hirvonen

(Ed.), Samisk skole i plan og praksis. Hvordan m⊘te utfordrin-gene i L97S? Evaluering av Reform 97 [Sámi School plan and practice: How to meet the challenges in the curriculum? Evaluation of the 1997 reform]. Kárášjohka, Norway: CálliidLágádus.

33.

Simpson

L. B.

(2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1–25. Retrieved from http://decolonization.org

34.

Smith

L. T.

(2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.) Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.

35.

Udir [Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training]. (2016). Regler for muntlig eksamen [Rules for the oral exam]. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/eksamen-og-prover/eksamen/muntlig-eksamen

36.

Walkington

, Petrosino

, & Sherman

(2013). Supporting algebraic reasoning through personalized story scenarios: How situational understanding mediates performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 89–120. http://doi.org/brxn