Background. Older adults, family members, and professionals may benefit from a safe driving behaviour self-/proxy-report. Purpose. During development of the Safe Driving Behavior Measure (SDBM), we conducted focus groups to (1) generate items based on respondents' driving experiences, and (2) obtain SDBM item-refinement feedback. Methods. Twenty-three older drivers (mean age 70.5, SD = 4.5) and eight family members (mean age 50, SD =20) from Ontario and Florida described safe driving behaviour (Focus Groups 1 and 2) and critiqued the SDBM (Focus Group 3). We coded responses using content and thematic analyses. Findings. Findings from Focus Groups 1 and 2 generated 23 themes (e.g., others' erratic driving) leading to 16 new items (e.g., avoiding collisions). Focus Group 3 findings generated 13 item revisions (e.g., indicating number of highway lanes). Implications. Using focus group findings, we created a version of the SDBM for future testing of construct validity with older drivers.
American Automobile Association. (2004). Roadwise review. Heathrow, FL: AAA Public Affairs
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2005). Statements: Driving and community mobility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 666–670
3.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625–683. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2009). CAOT position statement: Occupational therapy and driver rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://www.caot.ca/default.asp?pageid=1353
5.
ClassenS.WinterS. M.VelozoC. A.BédardM.LanfordD.BrumbackB.LutzB. J. (2010). Item development and validity testing for a Safe Driving Behavior Measure. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 296–305. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.296
6.
DickersonA. E.MolnarL. J.EbyD. W.AdlerG.BedardM.Berg-WegerM.TrujilloL. (2007). Transportation and aging: A research agenda for advancing safe mobility. Gerontologist, 47, 578–590
7.
EbyD. W.MolnarL. J.ShopeJ. T.VivodaJ. M.FordyceT. A. (2003). Improving older driver knowledge and self-awareness through self-assessment: The driving decisions workbook. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.006
8.
GreenL. W.GeorgeM. A.DanielM.FrankishC. J.HerbertC. J.BowieW. R.O'NeillM. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Royal Society of Canada
9.
GreenL. W.KreuterM. W. (2005). Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
10.
HaddonW. J. (1972). A logical framework for categorizing highway safety phenomena and activity. The Journal of Trauma, 12, 193–207
11.
IsraelB. A.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A.BeckerA. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
12.
MichonJ. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: What we know, what should we do? In EvansE. L.SchwingR. (Eds.), Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485–520). New York: Plenum
13.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
14.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.). (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2008). Older driver self-screening based on health concerns (No. DOT HS 811 046A). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
17.
RyanG. W.BernardH. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. doi: 10.1177/1525822x02239569
18.
StaplinL.Dinh-ZarrT. B. (2006). Promoting rehabilitation of safe driving abilities through computer-based clinical and personal screening techniques. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 22 (2), 129–138
19.
StoneM. H. (1997). Steps in item construction. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 11, 559
20.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (2003). Devising the items. In StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (Eds.), Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (pp. 15–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press
21.
VogtD. S.KingD. W.KingL. A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16, 231–243. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.231
